The United States has been dealing with what people call “The war on drugs” for over three decades. Over the years, drug experimentation has become very popular amongst young, middle class Americans. At first, Marijuana was a very common drug to use but as time went on hardcore drug experimentation became the new “thing”. Although the government did crackdown on major drug dealers, they paid little to no attention to the issue. It wasn 't until Nixon called on The War On Drugs. The war on drugs has always been a very controversial topic especially amongst politicians, and columnists. In the article “Rethinking the War on Drugs” Mark Kleiman, Jonathan Caulkins and Angela Hawken argue that although legalization of drugs sounds like an ideal …show more content…
Kleiman, Mr.Caulkins and Mrs. Hawken, the legalization of drugs would be an ideal solution to eliminate the black market but would result in an increase in drug abuse; an increase in drug abuse would lead to many negative societal effects. The authors claim that although the legalization may not be the most effective way to address the drug war they believe that decriminalization would be a probable solution under strict circumstances. They expand they idea of decriminalization by proposing several programs including 24/7, the “carding” program and HOPE. All three programs focus on diminishing drug addiction amongst the jail population. First, the program 24/7 helps people who are in jail for alcohol related crimes. Those who are enrolled in the program are released from jail under the impression that they will stay sober; they are breathalyzed every day, if their results show any signs of alcohol they are immediately sent back to jail. HOPE is a very similar program, it is focused on drugs, probationers would have to call in everyday to make sure they are not getting tested for drugs. The authors claim that programs similar to those would result in less drug use, less violence and a lower incarceration