Review Of John Alan Cohan's Essay 'Is Hunting A' Sport?

In his article "Is Hunting a 'Sport?'" John Alan Cohan delves into the contentious debate surrounding the classification of hunting as a sport. Cohan navigates through various definitions and perspectives to offer a nuanced exploration of the subject matter. This essay provides a summary of Cohan's arguments and critically engages with his analysis. Cohan initiates the discussion by dissecting the fundamental components of a sport, emphasizing characteristics such as competition, skill, physical exertion, and adherence to rules. He scrutinizes how these traits align with hunting practices and whether they suffice to categorize hunting as a sport. The author acknowledges the diversity of opinions regarding hunting's status, with proponents highlighting

He suggests that while hunting may not fit the conventional mold of competitive sports, it still involves elements of skill, strategy, and physical exertion that parallel athletic pursuits. Furthermore, Cohan delves into the ethical considerations inherent in hunting and its potential implications for conservation and wildlife management. He grapples with the moral complexities surrounding the killing of animals for sport and the responsibilities of hunters towards wildlife. While some argue that hunting can contribute to population control and habitat conservation, others question the ethical justification of killing animals for recreational purposes. Cohan carefully navigates through these ethical dilemmas, highlighting the need for thoughtful reflection and consideration of the broader ecological impact of hunting practices. Moreover, Cohan explores the cultural and societal dimensions of hunting, acknowledging how cultural attitudes and traditions shape perceptions of hunting as a sport. He recognizes that hunting holds significant cultural significance for many communities, serving as a means of sustenance, tradition, and