ipl-logo

Rhetorical Analysis Of Julian Castro

976 Words4 Pages

How determinative and essential is opportunity in order to create a society that is accompanied by appropriate prosperity? At Barack Obama’s convention in 2012, Julian Castro gives an endorsing speech in which a series of convenient traits are included. Based on the previous question, an analysis of Castro’s way of addressing and rhetorical level will be composed in the following content. Castro’s interesting and appealing way of addressing his audiences will be taken into account as well. What is his intention and how does he attain it? Lastly, the usage of his family and central arguments of the text will be taken into consideration and discussion. On a general level, Castro gives a speech on a professionally qualified rhetorical level. …show more content…

In a well deliberated epiphora, he describes a number of various things as being “American” which has great impact and repercussion on this exact audience. – (p.1, l. 22) This could also very likely be comprehended as an assonance since identical vowels are repeated. Americans are heavily characterized by their patriotism and love for their country so appealing to that will beneficially induce a feeling of cohesiveness. With a constructive output, the similar way of using small linguistic features, that each contribute to a good rhythm, sustains throughout the speech and those details are all a considerable part of him trying to persuade …show more content…

It is employed as an allegory that symbolises and represents the American dream and Castro’s point about how opportunity induces prosperity. With consistent hard work, you can achieve great things and provide opportunity for the generation ahead of you – identical with what Castro’s grandmother did. This particular idea of how a society ought to function is a very un-American way of thinking. Fundamentally, the people of USA are very preoccupied by their love for the constitution which is based on classic liberty and freedom from state. Obviously, this does not suggest that you are supposed to create opportunity for one another. USA have evolved to an imperious and powerful country so perchance it might be risky to adjust anything radically. Nevertheless, the concept of a society, in which you support each other, might not be that dreadful either. In plenty of other western countries, ensuring pre-K and educational grant have shown to be a great solution in order to achieve a well-functioning and not least a prosperous society. If the people of USA were willing to take the chance of associating and economically supporting the youth of America, they would, with great probability, have an America of even greater prosperity than they have

Show More
Related

Compare Zinn's Contribution To Society

1222 Words | 5 Pages

Source Analysis Assignment In source one, Howard Zinn discusses how there is no necessity for incentives in order for individuals to work collectively to contribute to society. Zinn suggests that generally, since, everyone has similar basic needs, it is unnecessary to have wide income gaps. His beliefs are from a collectivist standpoint because he proposes that there should be a more balanced distribution of wealth for everyone. He would oppose the belief of elitism and would support ideas such as a Universal Basic Income which ensures that every individual in a country receives a sum of money from the government which allows them to have basic necessities met.

Read More

A Rhetorical Analysis Of Speech By Cesar Chavez

412 Words | 2 Pages

Cesar Chavez wrote a piece in the magazine of religious organization on the ten year anniversary of Martin Luther King. He starts off saying that Dr. King was a very powerful man with nonviolent means. Throughout his writing he gives many example of why nonviolence will ultimately succeed over violent means, and give of many appeals of emotional, logical, creditable justification. Dr. King may have dies, but with his death only more power has come to the peaceful citizens of the world.

Read More

Rhetorical Analysis Of The Power Of Violence By Cesar Chavez

786 Words | 4 Pages

When the world is engulfed in injustice, it calls for brave men and women to fight back, but the question is how should one fight? Most would resort to violence to kill off injustice, but this leads to even more violence and chaos in most cases than intended. If someone is going to be shot the first reaction is to fight off the killer. However, Cesar Chavez implies in his powerful essay the weakness of violence in a unjust situation and instead the power of nonviolence.

Read More

Rhetorical Analysis Of Osama Bin Lama

1092 Words | 5 Pages

Austin King Ms. Den Otter A.P. English Language and Composition President Obama Speech Analysis     On the morning of September 11th, terrorists hijacked 4 planes, 2 of which were crashed into the World Trade Center Buildings, another hit the Pentagon, and one was crashed in a field in Pennsylvania. This tragic morning in American history caused the death of almost 3000 people, and the leader of Al-Qaeda, Osama bin Laden, was behind it. After planning a mission for around 4 years to execute Osama bin Laden, on May 2, 2011, he was killed by US special forces. President Obama follows this event with a speech, its goal being to inform the American people of the death of the man who had caused the death of so many loved ones, and achieves this by using rhetorical devices such as parallel structure and appeals to emotion.     In the beginning of President Obama’s speech announcing the death of Al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden, he reminds the American people of the tragic events that took place on the morning of 9/11, when “nearly 3,000 citizens were taken from us.”

Read More

Cesar Chavez Rhetorical Devices

566 Words | 3 Pages

Cesar Chavez During the 1960’s Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. was a civil rights movement activist. He used nonviolence to fight for what he believed until he was assassinated in 1968. In the article Cesar Chavez pleads to the audience that the only way to achieve meaningful change is not by killing or violence, but by nonviolent actions.

Read More

Rhetorical Analysis Of John F. Kennedy's Cuban Missile Crisis

955 Words | 4 Pages

John F. Kennedy, a former president of the United States, delivered his “Cuban Missile Crisis” speech on October 22, 1962, to the United States citizens and captives in Cuba. Those people were terrified of a nuclear missile attack during the Cold War time period. Due to the primary use of logos in Kennedy’s “Cuban Missile Crisis” speech, he informs his audience about the type of missiles in Cuba and the steps to be taken to respond to the Soviet Union’s placement of missiles in Cuba. This would hopefully alleviate some of the fear of the citizens of the United States. He shows pathos by continuing to ease the citizens’ fear of a missile attack by showing compassion towards the people.

Read More

Jfk Inaugural Speech Analysis

489 Words | 2 Pages

Compare how the speakers (JFK and Tim Collins) shape their language to create a sense of voice The inaugural speech, presented by John F. Kennedy, and the ‘Eve of battle’ speech, presented by Tim Collins, can both be analysed for the similarities and also differences, comparing how the speakers shape their language specifically to create a sense of voice. The instantly recognisable difference between the two texts is the genre. The speech by John F. Kennedy (JFK) is his inaugural address.

Read More

Barack Obama Rhetorical Analysis Essay

478 Words | 2 Pages

Furthermore, President Obama’s first inaugural speech contained patriotism, allusions, and anaphoras to appeal to the effect of pathos. His diction helps to persuade his audience that he is understanding and emotionally connected to the situation that America has been in and the importance of sticking to the ideas that our founding fathers have implemented thus far in America’s

Read More

Rhetorical Analysis Of Obama Speech

873 Words | 4 Pages

Introduction Hook: I never knew that one day, one idea could have such a big impact. That one thing could change the history, set up the rest of the country to follow suit with this specific topic, and things that need a change in general. Background: Over 50 years ago, on March 7, 1965, now known as bloody Sunday, segregation was still prevalent. At the time it was not allowed for blacks to vote at the time.

Read More

Impracticality Of The American Dream In 'The Great Gatsby'

767 Words | 4 Pages

Through imagery, symbolism, and diction, the two passages collectively offer a pessimistic critique on opportunity in America: although the American dream can certainly reinvent one’s future, the dream cannot alter one’s past,

Read More

Rhetorical Analysis Of Cesar Chavez Speech

845 Words | 4 Pages

In the text his main purpose was to persuade farm workers not to use violence to get their (farm workers) demands met, and boycott grape farms. In doing so the farmers would have to give in to demands of labor leaders. However, due to the struggles of others Throughout his speech there is a determined and insistent tone.

Read More

Rhetorical Analysis Of Nonviolence In Cesar Chavez's Article

409 Words | 2 Pages

In a magazine article by Cesar Chavez on the 10th anniversary of the assassination of Dr. Martin Luther King Junior, Chavez discusses the advantages of nonviolent resistance versus violent resistance, arguing that “nonviolence is more powerful than violence.” Chavez successfully develops his argument for nonviolent resistance by utilizing the rhetorical strategies of repetition and allusion. Chavez utilizes the rhetorical strategy of repetition throughout the article, repeating words like “nonviolent” and “we” to develop his and others’ stance on nonviolent resistance. Whenever Chavez states the word “nonviolent”, it is usually followed by its positive effects. For example, in the quote “nonviolence supports you if you have a just moral cause,” the word nonviolence is stated and is followed by its positive effect of supporting those with a righteous reasoning,

Read More

1984 Rhetorical Analysis

912 Words | 4 Pages

Award winning writer, George Orwell, in his dystopian novel, 1984, Winston and O’Brien debate the nature of reality. Winston and O’Brien’s purpose is to persuade each other to believe their own beliefs of truth and reality. They adopt an aggressive tone in order to convey their beliefs about what is real is true. In George Orwell’s 1984, Winston and O’Brien use a variety of different rhetorical strategies and appeals such as parallel structure, pathos, and logos in order to persuade each other about the validity of memories and doublethink; however, each character’s argument contains flaw in logic. Winston debates with O’Brien that truth and reality are individual and connected to our memories.

Read More

Rhetorical Analysis Of Ray Lewis Speech

603 Words | 3 Pages

In the speech he has used several rhetorical devices to make the delivery so insightful. He used anaphora when he began three sentences with forget in the beginning to make the team think about each player. Then he used epanalepsis in a section where he pointed at the players and stated that the only one who can control effort is you and you. When he did this he is putting major emphasizes by stating the word you twice with a pause between them. Lastly he used hypophora by asking all the questions as the introduction.

Read More

Rhetorical Analysis Of The Gettysburg Address

502 Words | 3 Pages

Rhetorically analyzing the speech, Lincoln uses many literary tactics to engage the audience in taking action in restoring America's unity. He utilizes shifts, comparisons, and repetition to create a speech that connects with the

Read More

More about Rhetorical Analysis Of Julian Castro

Related Topics

Open Document