Violence is said to never be the answer in any situation, as determined by America's constitution. If the basis of America is non-violence, the question comes up, why did America fight in Vietnam? Civil Rights leader Martin Luther King Junior sets out to solve this tragedy by giving a speech. In the article "Beyond Vietnam", Martin Luther argues that war in Vietnam has far reaching affects that not only rapaciously take away America's resources, but make an immediate impact on African Americans perspective on the civil rights movement. Luther starts off by explaining that Vietnam heavily takes away valuable money of the US. Because of this, he argues,"America would never invest the necessary funds or energies in rehabilitation of its poor". More specifically, using …show more content…
Later he goes on to explain that along with funds, Americans are mindlessly losing there lives when such epidemics are unneeded.The article mentions,"ending their sons and their brothers and their husbands to fight and to die". This text primarily serves to illustrate the dark side of the never ending war by describing the extraneous lives lost. Being consciously aware of these atrocious outcomes forces the reader to switch to Luther's side, while giving the war at Vietnam a negative connotation. The final point Luther points out is about young African American's perspective if this war goes along. The leader talks about how America's government is setting up the way their children think, and showing violence as the answer for the country's problem is projecting a bad example. The article says,"if our own nation wasn't using