A Rhetorical Analysis Of David Masci's Article On Animal Rights

Fighting Over Animal Rights:
A Rhetorical Analysis of David Masci’s Article on the Animal Rights Movement
The Animal Rights Movement has been striving for public attention for the past 20 years. Recently, the animal equality epidemic has been on a massive incline and is transforming into an immediate concern. Throughout the 1990s, people questioned whether or not animals should be viewed in the same light as human beings. The controversy within animal testing has continued to grow splitting the activists from the scientists. Louis W. Sullivan, Secretary of Health and Human Services referred to these supporters as not activists but “terrorists” for hindering their research opportunities (13) Freelance writer, David Masci, attempts to address

Masci’s credibility is solidified with his 14 plus years in experience as a writer. He writes to inform the people who are not familiar with these issues to let them form their own opinions on the topic. Throughout his article, he neglects to choose a stance on the matter. His main goal is not to persuade his readers to support or reject the movement rather Masci wants to inform his audience so they can form their own opinions. He questions whether the movement has come to a holt and is curious to see if there are still people out there that are willing to support the cause. To do this, he offers information to back up the pros and cons of the animal rights movement to place himself in an unbiased position. From there on out it is up to the reader to determine whether they want to support the cause or not after at least hearing both sides of the debate. If Masci persuades his audience to pick a stance and have a voice in the matter, then he accomplished his goal. Masci uses undeniable evidence and logic to prove to his audience that he is presenting credible material and is

Although, masci does not directly chose to support the movement or not, he accurately provides evidence and examples throughout his article to allow his audience to make their own decision. Masci clearly is interested in animal testing otherwise he would not dedicate an article to it. Whether he supports the movment or not, his intentions were to teach his readers about the cause and share his knowledge. He is aware that the animal rights movement is lacking in exigence. He states, “ Still, animal rights is not likely to become a major source of public interest litigation any time soon” (14). The point of Masci’s article is to get the word out and spread awareness on the movement because Masci feels there is a lack of people who know about this ongoing debate. Although Masci neglects to choose a side in the debate, he accomplished the task of making his readers think and form their own decisions with the information he has to offer. His overall goal was to figure out if the momentum of support for the cause was coming to a halt. While the answer to that question remains unclear, Masci is still able to use logic and reasoning to sway the opinions of his readers and make them care about the cause.. By writing this article, Masci shares his knowledge and research with the world to determine whether there are still people who care about this movement and are willing to fight