Rhetorical Analysis Of Is Junk Food Really Cheaper

724 Words3 Pages

Many Americans base their daily meal on hyper-processed calories that have or serve little to no nutritional value. Today, in the 21st century, obesity is constantly on the rise and is an issue that is constantly swept under the rug. “For every one supermarket, there are five fast food restaurants in the United States”, with supermarkets being outnumbered five to one, it isn’t a surprise that eating unhealthy is so common. Well-known essayist and writer, Mark Bittman, in his article, “Is Junk Food Really Cheaper”, published in the New York times, argues that junk food is not cheaper and junk food is held on a pedestal as a go-to simply because making a meal at home can not be produced in a snap of a finger, and society is more so lazy then cheap or indigent. Bittman uses ethos, by stating credible sources and logos by using statistics, and …show more content…

Bittman's purpose is to educate people on the misconception that it is too expensive to eat healthy in order to change how people view fast food. The audience seems to be parent based becasue he quotes, “raising our children in homes that don’t program them for fast-processed, low-nutrition junk” underlie this article and make it parent oriented. Bittman successfully addresses his audience of parents through his article in the New York Times through analytical facts.
Bittman begins his argument by listing how society automatically assumes and suggests that junk food is cheaper than real, healthier options. Bittman successfully appeals to the dedicated junk food eaters of the audience by comparing the cost the typical order for a family of four, “Two Big Macs, a cheeseburger, six chicken McNuggets, two medium and two small fries, and two medium and two small sodas--