ipl-logo

Rhetorical Analysis Of Keep American Wild

911 Words4 Pages

What is Richard’s Point of View? In the article “Keep America Wild,” Richard Powers talks about the changes that the Trump Administration is trying to do to the Mount Katahdin. At first, he gives us the oppositions against the president Donald Trump, since he is considering “delisting” monuments on Katahdin, and as he does this, he uses pathos in an adequate way to persuade his audience. Secondly, Powers indicates the further authorization that Donald Trump is taking throughout his presidency, no other president had ever taken, and as he does this, he brings credible evidence to support his argument and make it credible. Even though Powers have a lot of credibility throughout his article, he lets his argument weaken since he sounds uncertain …show more content…

The use of his words “might arguably” are the reason why it makes his statement confusing, and I think that it would be more credible if he would have used better wording, or more evidence. Even though he does he provides a little evidence to think about his point of view, he does not fully explains …show more content…

Powers argues that “no president has ever rescinded a national monument created his predecessor,” in order to make people think that the president is taking this way too far. And unlike the other argument, he supports perfectly his argument in a convincing way by stating that “a recent article in the Virginia Law Review contends that only Congress, not the president, has the legal authority to do so.” By this, he appeals once more to logic, and lets his audience wondering, why is the president making such changes? After that, Powers says that “law is being challenged every week,” where he leaves people concerned again. Also, he probably means that Donald Trump could make even more changes during his presidency. As Powers sees the visions that Donald Trump has for Mount Katahdin, he opposes them since he says that “it still rocks countless American visitors who each year make the journey to experience it.” With this, Powers appeals to emotions, since he made the audience realize that there is a lot of beauty on the nature of Katahdin. And then, his statement of “let’s make America rich again” is used as an opposition to Donald Trump. So with the use of this statement, Powers makes a quick, and clear connection, since Donald Trump uses the phrase: “Let’s make America great

Show More
Related
559 Words | 3 Pages

Oh, The Irony Benjamin Franklin takes on an ironic tone in his essay, Remarks Concerning Savages of North America. He has a way of stating his thoughts using a rhetorical manner. He uses the word “savages” in a way that could apply not only to natives but settlers too. He compares natives and white settlers throughout his writing to show that natives aren’t savages, but their way of living is different from what settlers are normally accustomed.

Read More
750 Words | 3 Pages

Jimmy Carter - Persuasive Techniques Usually, when people have to give a speech or write an essay they have to convey a message or convince the audience of a specific idea or argument. In this instance it is very important for the speaker to use the correct techniques so they can connect to the audience and convince them of their point of view. For politicians especially they must be able to have the audience intrigued and convinced of their ideas. In his speech to prevent those who wanted to industrialize and drill oil in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge in Alaska, President Jimmy Carter can be seen using many of the common argumentative techniques, such as logos, pathos, and ethos, to convince his audience against the industrialization of the Refuge. To build his argument, the reader can see Carter use his personal experiences, historical evidence, and alternative options to support his claim.

Read More
64 Words | 1 Pages

Finally, the film “The Patriot” by Robert Rodat uses the archetypes of the quest for revenge and the fall to reveal how we as humans are willing to go to war for freedom, and for family, and unite people together under one cause. People are willing to go to war for family, freedom, revenge and to bring together a country or group of people.

Read More
326 Words | 2 Pages

Into the Wild “‘ He was unheeded, happy and near to wild heart of life. ’”Christopher McCandless, pseudonym Alexander Supertramp makes the daunting decision to go off grid and live a nomadic lifestyle. Author Jon Krakauer uses fervent diction and descriptive imagery to depict McCandless’s turning point in his life and beyond to his final days in the Alaskan wilderness. Krakauer choses a specific tone to narrate the story, not far from a hypercritical sense.

Read More
920 Words | 4 Pages

Rhetorical Analysis of Jon Krakauer’s “Into the Wild ” Jon Krakauer ’s purpose in writing Into the Wild is to recount Chris McCandless’ journey, physical and metaphysical, from college in Georgia to his death in Alaska, through the use of factual, and anecdotal evidence. Krakauer uses factual evidence to establish that he is a trustworthy narrator capable of giving the reader a realistic scope on the events in the story. Jon uses anecdotal evidence to see into Chris’ psyche from the various perspectives found in the book’s excerpts, including how Jon understands the events.

Read More
113 Words | 1 Pages

In the speech “Kill the Indian, and Save the Man”, Captain Richard Pratt claims that the savagery of the Indians poses a problem to the advancement of the American society. He argues that their surroundings including language, superstition, and lifestyle cause this problem. TO support his claim, he provides the example of an Indian and White infant. He states that raising them in opposite environments will result in the acquisition of their respective qualities. Pratt proposes the solution of sending Indians to boarding schools, so they can gradually become civilized.

Read More
438 Words | 2 Pages

President, Jimmy Carter, in his speech, Foreword to Arctic National Wildlife Refuge: Seasons of Life and Land, argues that Arctic National Wildlife Refuge should be kept safe. Carter's purpose is to prevent the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to be developed for industry. He adopts a sympathetic tone in order to get Americans to protect the wildlife. Carter begins his speech by describing the beauty of the Arctic Refuge.

Read More
668 Words | 3 Pages

In the wake of the prevalence of industrialize among the United States, the former U.S president Jimmy Carter proposed that the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge is not supposed to be developed for industry in his foreword to Arctic National Wildlife Refuge: Seasons of Life and land, A photographic Journey by Subhankar Banerjee. Jimmy Carter effectively builds his argument by logically utilizing pathos, logos, and ethos to plead with the audiences to take his side. Jimmy Carter employs pathos to appeal to the audience’s emotion for supporting his argument. In paragraph seven, Jimmy Carter takes a stand on the position of American citizens to consider the issue of industry developing, and he suggests that “instead of tearing open the heart of our greatest refuge, we should use our resource more wisely.” To offer a proposal, Jimmy Carter as a citizen

Read More
184 Words | 1 Pages

The 8th grade class took a 4 day trip to Washington. We did many things to explore Washington D.C. including visiting monuments. Some people think differently of how a monument should be made. Good monuments to some people could be to make people remember about the person or thing being remembered or to just reflect the person’s life or importance. In “The Follower Problem” by David Brooks, David thinks a good monument should show power and authority.

Read More
598 Words | 3 Pages

If you go to Washington D.C. you can see all these different memorials that all stand for something different. You have the Lincoln memorial, Washington memorial, and so on. Then if you head to the west some you will find Mount Rushmore, which have the heads, of what people believed, the best presidents carved into the mountainside. When you look at all these great memorials that we have built to honor the people of the past you can’t help but feel some sense of awe. The thought that these great people once lived in the same country as you and that the past really did happen.

Read More
792 Words | 4 Pages

In the news today, a continual debate can be found about the significance of Confederate monuments and if they should remain or be removed. Confederate monuments that have been erected throughout the U.S. should be kept because of the preservation of America’s history. For instance, in the article, The Unbearable Lightness of Confederate-Statue Removal, the author lists how slaveholder monuments aren’t the only statues being vandalized, but the Lincoln Memorial and Mount Rushmore are other symbols of U.S. history that some believe need to “blow up” (Murdock). Every historical symbol can have both people who appreciate it and who oppose it. That doesn’t mean that we should tear down all symbols, but

Read More
945 Words | 4 Pages

In Animal Farm, George Orwell warns how power will often lead to corruption. Napoleon was placed in a position of power after Major died, and he slowly starts to lavish in his power and become addicted to the lush life of a dictator. When Napoleon first becomes a leader, he expresses how everyone will work equally, but as his reign goes on, he shortens the work hours. At the very end of the novel, the observing animals even start to see that pig and man had become the same. The irony present in the above example, illuminates how regardless of how much a ruler promises to maintain equality and fairness, the position of power that they hold, will corrupt them.

Read More
629 Words | 3 Pages

Jon Krakauer’s Into the Wild investigates the life and adventures of Chris McCandless. The author provides information about Chris’ life to illuminate his journey. Krakauer also uses rhetorical appeals to defend Chris’ rationale for his journey. Through Krakauer’s use of pathos, ethos, and logos, he persuades the audience that Chris is not foolish; however, Krakauer’s intimacy with Chris and his adventures inhibits his objectivity.

Read More
1487 Words | 6 Pages

Living Like Weasels Rhetorical Analysis In her essay “Living Like Weasels”, Annie Dillard explores the idea of following a single calling in life, and attaching one’s self it this calling as the weasel on Ernest Thompson Seton’s eagle had. Dillard presents her argument using the analogy of a weasel and how the; “weasel lives as he’s meant to, yielding at every moment to the perfect freedom of single necessity” (Dillard). In constructing her argument, however, she often contradicts herself undermining the effectiveness of her argument and leaving the reader confused. Dillard primarily uses ethos and pathos to support her argument and concerning both, the reader discovers; inconsistencies in her character, and conflicts between her perceptions

Read More
748 Words | 3 Pages

Bill Clinton is known as one of the most powerful speakers in the United States, and he impresses his audience by his speeches and the rhetorical devices that he includes in his speeches and addresses. For example, he effectively delivers his inaugural address with a convincing tone and some of the rhetorical devices such as allusions and strong diction. In his 1993 inaugural address, Clinton discussed the issues that America faced in the 20th century such as health care costs and low wages. He mentioned that these issues are not solved because America has not “made changes” and made progress to solve the conflicts and restore the economy. Because of this, Clinton knew it was important to ensure that all of the nation was behind him, and if

Read More

More about Rhetorical Analysis Of Keep American Wild

Related Topics

Open Document