ipl-logo

Rhetorical Analysis Of Keepin It Real With Hillary Clinton

944 Words4 Pages

Keepin’ It Real With Hillary The Presidential Election being only fourteen months away, presidential candidates, especially the republican candidates, are lined up as far as the eye can see. Some would say that this election is one for the year books, since the most favored candidates are not of the stereotypical politicians. The most noticeable nontraditional presidential candidate is Donald Trump, a high powered billionaire. Donald Trump has gained his traction by not being of the traditional political mold i.e., experience in politics, political correctness, etc. etc. The favored appeal of Donald Trump is that he comes off as genuine, that he says whatever comes to mind. If this is how Donald Trump is gaining and maintaining traction, then …show more content…

Ragland uses to propagate the idea of politicians speaking their mind is genre element. The editorial mimics the layout of a magazine interview. By mimicking the setup of an interview it gives it a sense of authenticity, as if this is a real interview that Hillary Clinton had. By using the setup of a magazine she is given the ability to let her guard down and answer questions without worry of being judged by the interviewer, as if she is speaking with a friend instead of an analyzer. Also, using the layout of a magazine shows a different side of Hillary Clinton. Meaning that the majority Hillary Clinton’s interviews are on major political outlets such as CNN, MSN, and Fox News, which makes her have her guard up at all times, since they are huge news networks. Using the setup of a magazine shows Hillary Clinton as being just another individual that enjoys magazines. She seems like an everyday person and not a politician. Adding a picture of Hillary Clinton, that is not like all of her other staged pictures, shows her as approachable, silly, and non-intimidating. Seeing Hillary Clinton in a silly photo shows her as genuine, not afraid to step away from her role as a powerful leader, but an everyday …show more content…

Ragland uses tone to amplify the appeal of politicians not being politically correct or thinking before they speak. Throughout the interview Hillary Clinton has the tone of arrogance. Answering all of the questions as if she is entitled to the Presidency and not asking for the Presidency. The answers that Hillary Clinton gives throughout the interview, shows that she does not weigh the effects of her words. For example, when asked about how she is ahead in the democratic polls, she answers by first laughing then saying that she is not surprised that she is ahead, that she knows how to get people to vote for her. This kind of response can leave voters feeling as if she does not deserve the presidency. That they are being tricked into voting for her. As if it is not of their own volition. Which would cause people to not vote for her and take away her lead in the polls. Since she does not have the tone of a person that is a professional in the interview she is given the ability to personally attack someone instead of their policies of ideals, such as her personal attack on Bernie Sanders’s hair, instead of answering the question of Bernie Sanders gaining

Show More
Related

How Does Clinton Use Pathos In Rwanda Persuasive Speech

621 Words | 3 Pages

In his speech to Rwandans in 1998 , Billa; Clinton claims many people are responsible for for the genocide and they all need to come together to fix it, using pathos and repetition to back up his point of view. First and foremost, Clinton uses pathos to convince the audience that many are guilty for the rwandan genocide and that many will have to make up for it. Clinton uses pathos to convince the audience that many are guilty for the Rwandan genocide and that many will have to make up for it. “And when they were found, the old and the sick, women and children alike, they were killed (...) because they had a Tusi parent, or because someone thought they looked like a tutsi,” (Clinton 1998). This quote emphasizes that women and children as

Read More

Rhetorical Analysis Of Stephanie Ericcson

134 Words | 1 Pages

Stephanie Ericcson appeals to readers emotions, because everybody does what she says in her writing. Being around people, and telling them things don’t always come out like they should, When talking to people it’s ok to tell the truth sometimes. People don’t always need to know the truth. Being in a bad situation and trying to get out of it, and telling a lies ok, some may not agree, but I think its ok.

Read More

Pros And Cons Of Bill Clinton Re-Election Of 1996

381 Words | 2 Pages

Based on his campaign visits, it is no surprise that Bill Clinton won the Election of 1996. Despite the events of Whitewater, Bill Clinton succeeded in his re-election campaign for the Presidency of the United States. In terms of campaigning, it appears that Bill Clinton was born to campaign. Overall, audience members of his campaigns visits responded positively right after the visit of the President on his re-election campaign. In one event early on in the campaign in 1995, Clinton visited the University of Texas at Austin were observers described Clinton as “to be in his element occupying the limelight and looking presidential”.

Read More

Rhetorical Analysis Of Margaret Chase Smith

1646 Words | 7 Pages

She begins, “Mr. President, I speak as a Republican. I speak as a woman. I speak as a United States senator. I speak as an American” (Smith 621). She exudes pride in her gender to both address and dismiss common prejudice regarding the issue.

Read More

Barbara Ehrenreich Rhetorical Analysis

1009 Words | 5 Pages

Reality checks are very powerful when trying to make strong points. Since the target audience is middle-class citizens, satire is used to get a reaction out of those individuals. Through phrases involving verbal irony through a sarcastic tone, Barbara is able to discuss a controversial topic while addressing a particular group. Barbara is complaining about how hard “scrubbing in Maine” has been and how much of a toll it has taken on her, “God knows. People on the street aren’t going to hail us as heroines of proletarian labor” (Ehrenreich 117).

Read More

Analysis Of White House Red Scare By Maureen Dowd

421 Words | 2 Pages

Her choice to persuade with primarily pathos is clever, as this year has been fueled tremendously by provocative fervor. Now that I have veered away from sole pathos from my impulsive viewpoint, I would more likely trust unbiased reports, or at least a columnist who can somehow find the "middle-ground," as Jay Heinrichs, author of Thank You For Arguing, puts it. From Heinrichs, I also detected some fallacies within Maureen's argument; the fact that it appeals to the [left-winged] popularity, and the instance of the "fallacy of antecedent," where Dowd uses her past interview with Trump, one conducted back in 1987, to label the president as "gullible" and "malleable," quickly assuming that Donald Trump will behave about the exact same thirty years later (141). However, I can clearly see how persuasive and effective her tactics can be on her target audience; Liberals tend to trust pathos much more than logos, which is vice versa for the opposing party. These short, permissive sentences could temporarily fire me up albeit my position: "The capital has never been more anxious about its own government . .

Read More

Clare Boothe Luce's Speech At Womens National Press Club

733 Words | 3 Pages

The speech given at Womens National Press Club in 1960 by Clare Boothe Luce was a strong argument by the statements made. She shows ethos and logical appeal to her audience by condemning her argument to her audience. Luce slows starts by setting up her audience where she goes on to criticize the tendency of the American press to give up journalist integrity. She also engages the fact to her audience that she is there to give her speech because the journalist invited her to speak. Luce is first very aware that by delivering her speech she is most likely to be criticized by her audience.

Read More

2004 Eulogy For Ronald Reagan Essay

303 Words | 2 Pages

In Margaret Thatcher's 2004 eulogy for Ronald Reagan, she uses many rhetorical strategies to convey her message that Ronald Reagan was a strong president who remained positive throughout the problems he faced with in office. The first rhetorical strategy Thatcher uses is the incorporation of loaded words with strong positive connotations. She uses words like “cheerful” (line 3), “invigorating” (4), “optimism” (13), and “grace” (22) to describe Reagan’s attitude and actions during his presidency. She also uses phrases like “lightness of spirit” (10) and “renewed faith” (31) to characterize and describe the positivity he approached everything with. Clearly, Ronald Reagan stayed positive, as Margaret Thatcher said he did.

Read More

Michelle Obama Ethos Pathos Logos

1083 Words | 5 Pages

She presents her own opinion but backs it up with facts, using logos with merit. Mrs. Obama has seen Mrs. Clinton’s life-long devotion to the nation’s children--advocating for kids with disabilities, and fighting for children’s health care and for quality child care. Mrs. Obama speaks of Hillary Clinton’s character. She tells the audience about Mrs. Clinton’s grit and perseverance and makes an effort to back this up with the fact that she lost the election eight years ago and didn’t get discouraged because she genuinely cares about the country. She doesn’t only mentions what she has done for the children, she mentions the roles she’s taken in the government: First Lady, Senator, and Secretary of State.

Read More

Rhetorical Analysis Of Bill Clinton's Speech During The Vietnam War

1333 Words | 6 Pages

It has always been known that in order to gain trust from voters and also sound credible political candidates need to assert both their personal and moral convictions. For example, John F. Kennedy confronted a religious issue in his Campaign Speech to the Houston Ministerial Association. On the other hand, Bill Clinton talked about his absence of experience on the military area and also stated his opposition towards the Vietnam War during his speech Address to the American Legion Convention. During the delivery of their speeches both candidates confronted a rhetorical obstacle; this obstacle was inertia, and structure and tone were the two strategies that served as key for the candidates to get through the obstacle.

Read More

Rhetorical Analysis Of 1976 Democratic National Convention Keynote Address

1112 Words | 5 Pages

She makes sure that the audience is aware that the Democratic Party isn’t perfect, they “have made mistakes” before but they are willing to “admit [their] mistakes” (Jordan). The willingness of the Party to accept their mistakes creates a sense of trust between them and their followers. She also evokes emotion through addressing the mistakes of the Party as being “of the heart” and with good intentions for their followers (Jordan). With this, she gains the sympathy of the audience because she is reassuring them that the Party always has the best intentions.

Read More

Pros And Cons Of Donald Trump Winning The Elections

281 Words | 2 Pages

The possibilities of Donald Trump winning the election are low because his votes can be drastically affected by his previous negative comments. This implies that Trump has been targeting people with racial negative comments that affect the whole United States. “The American people are not going to elect a president who insults Mexicans, Muslims, women, veterans, insulting virtually everybody who is not like Donald Trump.” (Bernie Sanders) This statement supports my opinion in which Donald Trump’s election can come to an end with his discriminating comments.

Read More

Rhetorical Analysis Of Women's Rights Are Human Rights

1054 Words | 5 Pages

She does a great job of explaining her point to her audience by repeating her main point over and over again. However, this speech was given twenty years ago, nothing was changed. At the time when Clinton gave her speech, it may not have been appreciated that much by the society. However, she mentioned this speech again in 2008, and this time, many more people came to know the reality of how women are being treated in other countries. Her speech was also considered influential in women’s rights movement.

Read More

Rhetorical Analysis Of Oprah's Speech

794 Words | 4 Pages

Oprah’s display as an orator should not go unnoticed. Throughout the entirety of her delivery, Oprah projects herself with a clear, calm, and strong yet soft emphasis. Oprah maintains stern eye-contact with the audience, and presents herself in a strong, iron-body demeaner. These oratorical techniques coincide to further captivate the audience and continue to ease the audience into the persuasion of the viewpoint presented in her speech. Given controversies of sexual assault in recent times, as well as ideas of feminism and female

Read More

A Rhetoric Analysis Of 'Dear Mr. President' By Pink

1005 Words | 5 Pages

The song “Dear Mr President” was composed by an American artist with an international fan base, Pink. In this song Pink speaks on behalf of America for the issues that have been left aside because they didn’t seem important to the former president, George W. Bush. George W. Bush was the 43rd president of the United States from 2001 to 2009. The purpose of this song was to confront the president and question the president’s morals and who he is as a person to see if he is proud of who he is and how he is running the country. In the song there are many issues that Pink is protesting within this song and example is the inadequacy of empathy towards the poor and the middle-class citizens.

Read More

More about Rhetorical Analysis Of Keepin It Real With Hillary Clinton

Open Document