Journal #1 Prompt: What negotiation or collaboration did you have with the writer of the novel you are reading? Write about your first meeting with the writer of the novel. What did you discover? Were your expectations met?
Through the 1790's and prior, The United States developed a systematic racism through slavery. Benjamin Banneker, an educated man, son of a freed slave, drafted a letter to Thomas Jefferson, writer of the Declaration of Independence. Banneker composed this letter to prompt Jefferson to take a strong stance against slavery so that slavery may eventually end. His letter courteously questions Jefferson's validity of the statement “all men are created equal” within the Declaration of Independence by calling to question the institution of slavery. Banneker uses repetition to reinforce a formal and respectful tone, utilizes strong and emotional diction, and concludes with a biblical allusion.
In a letter to sixth-grader Phyllis Wright, Albert Einstein employs rhetorical appeals to credibility and logic in order to effectively offer Wright different viewpoints about scientists and religion but ultimately responds to her question insufficiently. Einstein takes advantage of his reputation as a renowned scientist to create broad, encompassing statements that few others could. An amateur scientist could only reliably offer himself as evidence, but Einstein portrays the scientific community by using the first person pronouns “our” and “we” and making statements about “everyone who is involved in science.” Speaking on behalf of fellow scientists allows him to present a stronger explanation because his facts given are representative of
The second paragraph starts off with a historical allusion to Einstein, And
Nevertheless, using another source of evidence, Barry was able to again persuade the audience from a different point of view. As seen in the text, “And just as Einstein refused to accept his own theory until his predictions were tested, one must seek out such findings” (Barry). This showed that the author is credible and persuasive by using a well known scientist to aid him in explaining uncertainty. Coincidentally, Einstein went through the struggle of uncertainty himself, he is better able to understand the importance of it. However, using all scientist’s as a source for understanding the importance of uncertainty, gives Barry the advantage of multiple sources.
Most people say life is extremely valuable and every day is a gift. Personally, I did not believe life was very valuable until I was medicated. With my mental illnesses every day of my life is a struggle, and I have to take medications to have normal brain functions like most people. Before I started taking Zoloft I thought it would be a magic pill that would immediately cure me and make me happy. The first few weeks I honestly thought I was dying, but I believed my doctors when they said the benefits would outweigh the side effects.
Einstein In Einstein’s letter to, Franklin D. Roosevelt, he discusses the importance of uranium. Einstein informs Roosevelt on what the element, uranium could do. He has communicated with Fermi and Szilard, about how uranium can be “turned into a new and important source of energy”. Einstein tries to convince Roosevelt that this could very well work.
The ethos of Einstein’s letter comes from the positive reputation he created among the scientific community by establishing the theory of relativity and winning the Nobel Peace Prize in Physics in 1921. These accomplishments allow Einstein to have a positive ethos, which makes his writing appear trustworthy to many people. Additionally, Einstein’s writing style contributes to his ethos, something that can be observed in the line, “However, it must be admitted that our actual knowledge of these laws is only imperfect and fragmentary, so that, actually, the belief in the existence of basic all-embracing laws in Nature also rests on a sort of faith” (Einstein 10). Within this sentence, Einstein demonstrates a scholarly understanding of both the English language and his subject, a factor that plays an important role in his reputation when one considers that Einstein would likely not be given so much respect if he often wrote poorly or spread false information. He uses pathos by writing to Wright in an incredibly polite manner, which is apparent in his send-off of, “I hope this answers your question.
There was a soldier named Albert. He was someone reported lost in action. His family cried his dead and said goodbye in 1942. Although Albert wasn’t lost and his life will have changed unexpectedly forever. October 6th, 2017.
In the autobiography Mein Kampf by Adolf Hitler, he expresses his political ideologies and strategies in ruling over millions of people. He mostly reveals his perspectives on racial matters, asserting that the Aryan race is dominant over any other ethnic groups. Although Adolf Hitler’s statements successfully convinced and appealed to almost all the people in the Germanic nation, his arguments, however, are undoubtedly loaded with logical fallacies. In Chapter 11 of the autobiography, Hitler mainly focuses on his notions regarding racial superiority.
The work of these two men, of two different times and of different cultural backgrounds, shared similar views of the hypocrisy of the white society towards Native Americans and the discrimination of Native Americans by white society. Both very much agree that the Natives are being mistreated. Franklin takes a front on the hypocritical culture of the white society, while Apes uses several rhetorical questions and biblical references to question their religion. Franklin’s main concern was that the Natives were anything but savages. Franklin looks at the culture of both societies and notices that the Natives are politer and the English were more of savages.
Rhetorical Analysis of “Peace in the Atomic Era” The military gives people a sense of protection, which is important, but how much is too much? On February 19, 1950, Albert Einstein gave a speech at Princeton University titled “Peace in the Atomic Era”. In the speech he was discussing his opinion on what he stated was the “most important political question”. He constructed a well argument which persuaded his audience that security through ordnance isn’t a way to achieve peace throughout the nations, but collaboration is. In his speech Einstein used multiple persuasive techniques to support his argument, such as logos, pathos, and rhetorical questions.
Everyone has heard of Adolf Hitler and how he tried to conquer Europe. He attempted doing it at the right time when everyone thought that Germany was going to lose everything, because, the national debt and inflation was so high. Germany was so desperate for anyone to help them that Adolf Hitler saw a chance to step up and be in charge of everything. Hitler was very good at acting like he really cared about his people. He claimed to the German people that he would help with unemployment, help businesses, success to the failed businesses, and to expand their army to make them more powerful.
The rays of light were bent as they passed close to the sun” (Ireland 42). This shows that Albert Einstein is intelligent because he had figured out a flaw in an incredible scientist’s law about science. This is important because it shows how he was intelligent enough to disregard that everyone thought something was right, and still be able to prove them wrong. This shows how intelligent Albert Einstein was and how it lead him to be incredibly
This model added to the advancement of quantum mechanics. c. Reason for listening: This topic is important because people often only think about Einstein’s theory of general relativity, but he offered so much more. d. Credibility: For my informative speech, I have conducted extensive research on the scientific contributions of Albert Einstein. e. Thesis Statement: People view Einstein work as just if he has only contributed a few things to sciences and physics, but he did a greater amount then the majority of people know. Preview of major points: In this speech, I will show you
