ipl-logo

Rhetorical Analysis Of Letter To Lord Orwin By Gandhi

641 Words3 Pages

Rebellions are often thought of as a tumultuous military style event. Gandhi shows that this is not always the case through his letter to Lord Orwin. Gandhi used non-violence to rebel against the British successfully, starting with his letter to Lord Orwin. Gandhi uses the rhetorical strategies of personal appeal, repetition, tone and comparison to peacefully explain why he must peacefully remove British colonialism in India. Gandhi uses word repetition to emphasize the evils of British imperialism and his intent of peace. Gandu repeated evils (lines 29, 36, and 47) to emphasize his point about the truth about the nature of British colonialism and its effect on India.. First, “evils” (line 29) was used to describe the British actions of “greed” …show more content…

Through Gandhi’s “desire” (line 63) to avoid “unnecessary embarrassment” (line 63), he demonstrates his compassion for the English which is best exemplified by his “equal love” (line 21) for the British and Indians. Beyond compassion, Gandi desires friendships between the two nations with “independence” (line 35) for India and “friendly negotiations” (line 32) once independence is reached. However, his tone also shows clear disgust for the “cruel monopoly” (line 56) from the British. Gandhi’s message of independence for India through non-violence was prevalent through both his tone of compassion and …show more content…

Gandhi compares his morals to seeing, which were “blindly” (line 16) following the British until his morals “were opened” (line 17). When his morals were blinded, he could not see the harms of British imperialism. However, with the opening of his morals, he began to notice the harms of British Imperialism and fight for change He also draws the comparison between non-violence and a “weapon” (line 19). Weapons are associated with a rebellion and viewed as dangerous but capable of making change, and with the analogy. He then showed that like weapons non-violence can be used for change as well.Through analogies, Gandhi argues for a non-violence, moral, freeing or India.Lastly, Gandhi makes a personal appeal to Lord Orwin inorder to see change. Gandhi wanted to “appeal to” (line 48) Lord Orwin’s heart inorder to make sure that Lord Orwin didn’t “frustrate [Gandhi’s]... design by arresting” (line 57) Gandhi. Gandhi is acknowledging the authority of Lord Orwin, and showing his hope that Lord Orwin will do what is right, and not arrest Gandhi. Another reason was so that Lord Orwin may be able “to deal with these evils” (line 47) and Gandhi’s protest would not be necessary. Lastly, Gandhi shows his compassion as a personal appeal by wishing no “unnecessary embarrassment” (line 63 and 64) upon Lord Orwin. Through this Gandhi attempts to build an emotional attachment of compassion and reason so that Lord Orwin might listen to him.

Show More
Related
701 Words | 3 Pages

Gandhi’s use of ethos, pathos, and logos in his speech, “Defending Nonviolent Resistance”, contributes to his intended purpose to incite change in the government. In the beginning of his speech, Gandhi uses an ethical approach, or ethos, to gain the trust of his audience, which was made up of the British government, his fellow Indians, and the judges. Gandhi wanted to let the court know that he “would like to state that [he] entirely endorse[s] the learned advocate

Read More
480 Words | 2 Pages

Gandhi people manage their anger and have peace against the British. He did this by creating a philosophy and encouraging people to follow that philosophy. Gandhi also used peace instead of violence against the British. Gandhi did this because he believed that he can achieve peace among everybody. Gandhi’s philosophy didn't work on everyone.

Read More
1532 Words | 7 Pages

The truth Gandhi was searching for was justice and by mentioning the word God, Gandhi is saying that justice is his end goal and what sets his parameters for right and wrong. This strengthened Gandhi and his followers because their goal would be to bring justice to the British through non-violence. Justice would be the reason why the protesters

Read More
477 Words | 2 Pages

When the British began taxing salt and not allowing Indians to manufacture and collect their own salt, Gandhi stepped in and wrote a letter to the British governor of India. He was determined to show the British what wrongs they have done to India and to convert them through nonviolence (Doc 1.) Even when Gandhi was in jail, he inspired his followers to march without the use violence. None of his followers fought back even when they were beaten (Doc 4.) Being in jail for a total of 2,338 days, he “never felt the slightest hesitation in entering the prisoner’s box.”

Read More
950 Words | 4 Pages

Racial prejudice against Indians through government law is corrupt and unjust. “Defending Nonviolent Resistance” was a speech written and given by Mohandas K. Gandhi before he was sentenced to six years in prison for stirring up rebellion. Gandhi was a leader of the Indian nationalist movement who had a law degree. He spent much of his life volunteering to help the people of India under a government that he did not agree with. While working with Montagu-Chelmsford to make a change in his home country, Gandhi became a known advocate for non-violence.

Read More
1665 Words | 7 Pages

Gandhi once said, “An eye-for-an-eye makes the whole world blind.” What he meant is that fighting violence with violence helped no one. During his lifetime, Gandhi fought against oppressive British rule in India, and his journey was known throughout the world. Martin Luther King Jr. and Nelson Mandela both shared Gandhi’s thirst for freedom, basing their respective movements for peace on Gandhi’s. All three men fought peacefully for equality, whether it was for India’s freedom from the British empire, emancipation from apartheid laws that prohibited black Africans from being truly free, or liberation from Jim Crow laws to keep black Americans inferior to whites.

Read More
1059 Words | 5 Pages

This is what allowed the movement to work because their dramatic act of non-violence and self composure showed the rest of the world how awful the British government was and how the Indians were doing nothing wrong. The loyalty and faithfulness to Gandhi was incredible and a key factor to the success of the movement, because even after Gandhi's protesters had been “Sentenced to three months imprisonment with hard labor and and had been fined heavy amounts,”(Document C) most continued to protest and fight for what they thought was unfair. The protesters had a quality that helped them in the non-violent movement which was

Read More
693 Words | 3 Pages

Gandhi was an Indian in a society where British rule was accepted as the norm. Both Gandhi and Antigone also recognized and spoke out against the injustices of their respective societies. In Antigone’s case, it was the oppression of women and the corruption of the leadership. In Gandhi’s case, it was the oppression of Indians under British rule and the discrimination faced by lower castes in Indian society.

Read More
782 Words | 4 Pages

Although, violently fighting the British may have eventually won India its independence, Gandhi choosing to be nonviolent caused India to learn how to do things on its own while still reaching its goal of actually being independent from the British significantly faster. Gandhi’s use of nonviolence was because he didn't want to hurt anyone, he just wanted India to be independent. Going to jail gained Gandhi attention, followers and respect, and lastly, Gandhi not seeing the British as his enemy contributed to a more peaceful way on how to gain India’s freedom. Gandhi doing this caused India to eventually gain it’s independence in

Read More
702 Words | 3 Pages

Ghandi used many methods to achieve this, including leading nonviolent protests, civil disobedience and negotiation with British authorities. This article provides evidence of the strong relationship between Randolph’s quote and Gandhi's actions Body Gandhi believed that he would not be granted freedom by the British authorities, instead, freedom would have to be won through collective efforts of the

Read More
344 Words | 2 Pages

Gandhi was an incredibly influential political and spiritual leader. Despite this he was not flawless and the author George Orwell disagrees with Gandhi's morals in his sainthood. Through various rhetorical strategies and a strong tone, Orwell forms a solid argument against the ideas portrayed by Gandhi. Diction is important to note when understanding how Orwell develops his own position and criticizes Gandhi’s.

Read More
468 Words | 2 Pages

If one uses this method because he is afraid or merely because he lacks the instruments of violence, he is not truly nonviolent. This is why Gandhi often said that if cowardice is the only alternative to violence, it is better to fight. "He also states “any law that degrades human personality is unjustifiable” By using these examples, King shows that nonviolent resistance is a legitimate and effective means of achieving change.

Read More
1304 Words | 6 Pages

Due to the race inequality along with the economic regulations among the Indian people, Gandhi’s ambition from the beginning of simply just wanting equality between the Indian and British transition to wanting India to become Independence. He wanted to give the Indian citizen a voice in the government and a chance to define their own nation. The Indian people lose their political power in terms of how the British authorities were exercising their power over them, implementing policies according to their own rules and administrating over the Indian’s resources. Gandhi throughout the film had the desire to help gain back India’s political power and it revolves around his method of passive resistance and self-sacrifice. He belief in “an eye for an eye only makes people blind” is what helped him achieve freedom for India without any violence involve.

Read More
459 Words | 2 Pages

For example, when he uses the words “curse” and “unnecessary” this can easily cause him to think this letter is just Gandhi’s way of insulting him. Going back to paragraph 2, Gandhi mentioned he, “holds the British rule to be a curse”. Because of this, he is now portraying the feeling that he is not in the position to make agreeable gestures, or respect the manner of the Lord. Which in that case, could be a reason why the viceroy did not respond to Gandhi’s letter. Due to all the things Gandhi had said about the viceroys rule, when he says “this is not intended to be a threat” it really gives the Lord no other way to feel about Gandhi’s

Read More
610 Words | 3 Pages

Gandhi always made sure that they kept the movement nonviolent. They had meetings on how they were going to approach the movement, they were organized and had a plan. Gandhi got many of his ideas and principles through reading the bible, reading the Bhagavad Gita, and writers like Henry David Thoreau. Gandhi and the Indian people created some dilemmas to throw the British government off balance. Gandhi told the Indian people to boycott all British goods and only buy Indian goods.

Read More

More about Rhetorical Analysis Of Letter To Lord Orwin By Gandhi

Related Topics

Open Document