Rhetorical Analysis Of Sojourner Truth's Ain T I A Woman

538 Words3 Pages

Amid the rise of women’s rights activism in 1851, Sojourner Truth rose to address a speech so powerful, it resonated throughout history and culture, sparking others to help in the quest for equality and justice. Speaking to a crowd at the Women’s Rights convention in Akron, Ohio, Truth, an African American woman and former slave, condemned the injustices that African Americans faced with logic cut through pretenses and prejudices. “Ain’t I a woman?” Is a persuasive argument that seeks to dismantle society’s views that oppress these groups through the tactical use of rhetorical devices. Using methods such as rhetorical questions, repetition, and the combination of ethos, pathos, and logos, Truth argues for the equality of women and emphasizes …show more content…

This rhetorical question has brought out the contradiction of societal attitudes towards black women based on race and gender, and how unfounded that is with every use of the question. It works as a perfect strategy to lay bare the perceived logic that underlines inequality, and makes it seem ridiculous compared to existing norms. In her speech, Truth also uses repetition to great effect, giving the full weight of both pathos and rhetorical devices to her demand for equal treatment and to be considered equal. She shows her strong physical and emotional character time and again, most powerfully through lines like, “I have ploughed and planted, and no man could head me!”, strongly disproving the stereotype of woman weakness. All these examples of repetition confirm not just the fact that she could do the tasks of a man, but highlight the underlying strength that any woman, regardless of their race or position in life, has. Finally, Truth brings out the best, braiding ethos, pathos, and logos together to make a strong argument for women’s and African Americans’