ipl-logo

Rhetorical Analysis Of Tell Me Everything

1476 Words6 Pages

Tell Me Everything: The Story of a Private Investigation is the intense story of Erika Krouse’s experience as working as a private investigator, despite being unqualified and unlicensed. After her many hardships and thoughts of quitting, an unignorable sexual assault assignment came along that completely changed her views on her job. She worked tirelessly to get justice for the victim no matter what it takes, as she knows personally what it is like to go through such an occurrence. The excerpt covers the reason why she becomes an investigator: being a comforting face for people to confide in. This passage details the confusion, shame, and anger Krouse endures as she begins her first few months as a private investigator, and how she struggles to succeed in the field. …show more content…

She begins with a sense of confusion by saying, “I knew my methods were wrong, but I didn't know what the right ones were.” Then it leads into a feeling of awareness of what could be going wrong, then anger for not having to be qualified. Through her lengthy list, she shows her distress and attempts to prove herself. Finally, it ends with a tone of disappointment as she feels like she failed herself and her boss, “I had never exactly been a wunderkind, but I had never failed at anything so spectacularly before. I wondered which would disappoint Grayson more—if I quit, or rode this job until the wheels fell off and the poor guy was forced to fire me.” These switches in tone and emotion behind her words clearly show her panic towards the situation, and the reader can feel as though they are going through the panic with her. It also provides a relatable feel to the passage since everyone knows the array of emotions that are felt when going through a stressful situation, and the reader can feel empathy to Krouse’s

Open Document