Rhetorical Analysis Of The Fight For Civil Rights By Cesar Chavez

531 Words3 Pages

A decade later after Martin Luther King Jr’s assassination, Cesar Chavez published an article to help those people fight for civil rights and those in need of help. This disaster affected many people’s heart that were fighting during the Civil Rights Movement and those that were also helping the people in need of help. Chavez uses emotional appeal,diction,and repetition supports his article in helping those involved in civil rights. Chavez appeals to pathos to express the torment that the lower class is dealing with like the farmers and the workers that do not earn much money. He describes that violence is making the large percentage of people feeling “ frustration,impatience,and anger which seethe inside every farm worker.” The most people that are supporting the people fighting for the civil rights are the farm workers and resulting to violence will make things even worse for them because they are already in a hardship. Chavez also describes the that the people working in the fields of America are put in “ the burdens of generations of poverty and powerlessness.” This means that the decisions are depended on the workers that are in the lower class and they are the only people that can make an impact because of the large …show more content…

He states” We are also convinced that nonviolence is powerful than violence” shows his readers that they should follow the nonviolence decision because if they do go to violence then they would be considered bad people. He switches from “Freedom” to “ no honor” to describe what violence will take away from the people and make lives take more agony than ever before. He also describes winning with violence is a “ victory with strings attached” meaning that violence will lead to injuries and death of many innocent lives. It will make the people rethink that if it was possible to go to a different result rather than this bloodthirsty