Rhetorical Analysis Of Where Sweatshops Are A Dream

In his New York Times essay, “Where Sweatshops are a Dream,” columnist Nicholas Kristoff explores the controversial side of sweatshops. In his essay, he demonstrates to his audience that while he believes sweatshops can be detrimental to workers, they also benefit the people of that country. He breaks his essay into two main parts; the first is the presentation of a new perspective on sweatshops. The second is the explanation of how sweatshops affect the nation and a different way to help that nation in poverty. This purpose is accomplished by his use of pathos and logos, which drives his essay to be compelling and thought provoking.
Kristoff begins his essay by creating an image that plays on the emotions of the audience. He vividly describes

He makes a point by stating that manufacturing has the ability to produce millions of jobs and that it’s one of the few opportunities low income families have to escape poverty. To support this point, he presents an example of a current situation involving imports from poor countries in Africa. If America and Europe began supporting more African imports it would greatly advance the nation’s economy and the welfare of its people. By using logos Kristoff has provided clear reasons on why sweatshops are important to nations in extreme poverty and that importing products is one way to help.
Although he provides sound evidence as to why sweatshops should be supported, Kristoff acknowledges that his audience may, “have a hard time accepting that sweatshops can help people.” Through organization and evidence he is able to educate is audience, however the one flaw in his argument is his ethos. Despite living in a third world country, Kristoff wasn’t born into poverty and can never empathize with those who do live in poverty. In spite of this shaky credibility, Kristoff is able to give a voice to those who rely on sweatshops as a place of employment.
Overall, the argument Kristoff makes is effective because his essay has a clear thesis and is well organized. His use of pathos and logos creates a perfect dynamic that brings his readers in by creating