Richard Criminal Justice Case Study

2791 Words12 Pages

Richard a kid who made a mistake, then having his freedom taken away is the worst thing that can happen to a human. When fairness isn’t administered it is vanished from the person. In Richard’s case he was not given the chance to speak for his liberty. He was shut down completely with no knowledge of what was happening. Richard was a kid that the system took with no fundamental reason. It was all played out well by the justice system, something that usually happens to people who commit a mistake and isn’t even heard before being judge and sentenced.
Justice can be different for so many people like Richard being sentenced could be justice to people who believe that he wanted to murder his own mother. In fact the people who have this mentality …show more content…

The system is like a beast if you don’t watch out for it and you don’t know its scams it will certainly capture you. And when that happens to anyone it’s the worst, that’s what happened to Richard. Lawyers have to be smart and know the system well, that’s the first part of a big puzzle. The reason to be smart is to know the system beck and forth and to know the judges because that will help a lot in any case. And that’s a great thing for the defense side and the prosecution side.
The defense side was completely lazy to what is said by Richard. Nothing was ever explained to him, neither was any effort of his freedom an interest to the defense side. A kid who lost into the system and caught by a plea bargain is the worst to imagine for any person. Richard was brain washed and manipulated to take the plea bargain. People can see what type of person he is now and he is not that criminal that he is said to be. He is much more than that, a person with morals who kept taking classes and working …show more content…

Being heard by a jury is difficult than being heard by a judge, the reason for that is that jury trials are more complicated. As long as Richard was given the correct guidance to what a jury trial is and what the consequences of going through such a trial he would have done great. A little respect in the court room goes a long way. Addressing the judge as “your honor” and not by last name is best. Being polite to the opponent would’ve helped Richard too. Respecting procedures and people in the court room would have shown that he was a smart kid. With a good lawyer Richard would have been told not to interrupt and to sit quietly. Even if the opponent or the judge imply that Richard isn’t saying the truth. The point is to acknowledge was is happening at every moment that Richard was in the court room being accused of his mother’s murder. Catching the opponent’s mistakes would be a key to Richards’s trial. When Richards defense lawyer had the chance to speak for him that’s when it’s time to prove Richards innocence. And to show that Richards mind wasn’t fully there at the moment of his mother’s