ipl-logo

Rick Warren's Argument For The Existence Of God

1390 Words6 Pages

Rick Warren and Sam Harris are undoubtedly leaders in different spheres of thought. Warren, a big-name evangelist and founder of one of the largest churches in the United States, debated Harris, a soft-spoken neuroscientist and key player in the proliferation of New Atheism, under the supervision of Jon Meacham for a Newsweek special. In the conflict of theism versus atheism—God or no God—Warren makes a case for the former, explaining that because of our limited knowledge of the universe and our inherent feeling of spirituality, we must have faith in the traditional Christian God. I agree with Warren in that the human scope of knowledge is extremely limited, but I staunchly disagree that this assumes the existence of God. Not only are Warren’s claims about miracles, atheists and his rationale regarding morality factually unfounded, they are primarily the result of some characteristic psychological fallacies.
One of Warren’s chief arguments for the existence of God is the notion of answered prayer. He tells this story of an intern at his Church who is having an immigration issue. Warren prayed to God, asking for his help. When he went out walking that he night, he met a woman who just so …show more content…

Honestly, I believe that Rick Warren is a real standup guy. He expresses a deep-rooted sense of spirituality and holds firm in his beliefs. However, the fact that he is a moral and sensible explains why he is predisposed to fallacious thoughts. Warren’s conservative views have kept him rooted—rooted to the point that he has never considered the alternative to a Christian God. Warren seeks confirmation that his God exists so anything he sees to be true, he assumes to be true. These false assumptions are dangerous but are also merely human nature. Therefore, I think it’s necessary for everyone—even the most brilliant people—to challenge their own beliefs every once in a while. We might change our beliefs about God and maybe learn something about the fundamental nature

Show More
Related
1347 Words | 6 Pages

In Lara Buchak’s essay, Can It Be Rational to Have Faith? , she asserts that everyday faith statements and religious faith statements share the same attributes. She later states that in order to truly have faith, a person ceases to search for more evidence for their claim, and that having faith can be rational. Although she makes compelling arguments in favor of faith in God, this essay is more hearsay and assumption than actual fact. In this paper, you will see that looking for further evidence would constitute not having faith, but that having faith, at least in the religious sense, is irrational.

Read More
1064 Words | 5 Pages

arizona case of 1961”( Newton 2) which he was the chief justice for. The Supreme Court concluded that defendants must be informed of their rights; their right to remain silent and the fact that statements they made might be used against them, their right to consult an attorney, and their right right to have an attorney appointed if they could not afford one (Rose 301). You are required to state their rights to them, if they are not stated then they are self incriminating themselves. Without these rights being stated the people don't know what could or couldn't get them in even more trouble just by saying a couple words when you're being arrested. Warren was helping the citizens not to incriminate themselves, not get themselves in anymore trouble than they already are

Read More
258 Words | 2 Pages

1953 to 1969, Earl Warren presided as chief justice of the U.S. Supreme Court. Under Warren 's leadership, the Court actively used Judicial Review to strictly scrutinize and over-turn state and federal statutes, to apply many provisions of the Bill of Rights to the states, and to provide opportunities for those groups in society that had been excluded from the political process. During Warren 's tenure, the Court became increasingly liberal and activist, drawing the fire of political and judicial conservatives who believed that the Warren Court had over-stepped its constitutional role and had become a legislative body. The Warren Court itself became a catalyst for change, initiating reforms rather than responding to pressures applied by

Read More
751 Words | 4 Pages

Mercy Otis Warren was a female writer who had an influence on certain issues during the later half of the Eighteenth Century. From the era of the Revolution to the formation of the Constitution, Warren spread her political viewpoints and beliefs through the writing of plays, booklets, etc. Her political involvement can be credited to the familial influence of her father and brother. If not for this, Warren would not have, in the end, gained the respect of several Revolutionary figures, including Samuel Adams and George Washington (Kort). As her written works began to grow in popularity, Mercy Otis Warren was able to spread her anti-federalist ideas.

Read More
784 Words | 4 Pages

Mary Warren liked the amount of power she held in the court. She even argues with Elizabeth and says she had a reason to not show up to work since she considered herself a vital judge of the court. On one hand, Mary Warren knows it was the right action to do; help Elizabeth because she contributed to Elizabeth’s arrest. On the other hand, she knows she will lose Abigail's alliance if she testifies against her, and she does not want to lose the power that she was given through being associated with Abigail. Abigail was by far Mary Warren’s most significant influence.

Read More
825 Words | 4 Pages

Warren feels she has the people sided with her, saying this, “…yet the voice of the people appears present strong against the adoption of the Constitution…” (76) She is saying that even though other conventions and states have ratified, the peoples’ voices matter and there is still some that reject this Constitution and won’t give in. Warren tries to get people to not ratify it by explaining her conspiracies in this pamphlet, read by the

Read More
838 Words | 4 Pages

Mercy Otis Warren also opposed the Constitution saying that, “...There is no provision for a rotation nor anything else to prevent a political office from remaining in the same hands for life.” (Doc #2) Warren worried that one person ruling up to death would give him too much power and leading him to believe he is superior and eventually

Read More
983 Words | 4 Pages

Perhaps, the most frightening aspect of this book is the ever-darkening depravity of American culture. Honestly, if a reader traces the opponents of fundamentalism through the work, they find a disturbing trend that explains why America is facing the problems she’s facing today. Slowly but surely, those who hold to fundamentalism are becoming fewer in number. Now, most well-educated people would not know what fundamentalism is or (more importantly) what it stands for. Small wonder America is going to Hell in a handbasket (pardon my

Read More
1023 Words | 5 Pages

Throughout the course of America's History, there have been decisions in law that have defined the America as a country, that have reinvented laws for better or for worse, and have affected the lives of millions. Some of these impactful decisions fell under the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court like Marbury v. Madison, Dred Scott v. Sandford, and Plessy v. Ferguson. Of course without the judgment of the Supreme Court Justices, none of the decisions could have been made. Earl Warren was a Supreme Court Justice who served from 1953 to 1969. During this period Earl Warren was truly able to leave a lasting impression on America’s history by helping decide court cases that were extremely important to the lives of millions in America then and now.

Read More
589 Words | 3 Pages

He only wished to save the lives of his friends and show us the extremity taken to unrealistic events. Instead, for his courage he is said to be overthrowing the court. Mary Warren’s word, the word of a young girl who sided herself with satan is taken higher than that of a grown man’s? The court has no clear evidence that anyone here has sided with the devil! Yet, with all the evidence pointing towards these girls being liars, we take advantage of the situation.

Read More
404 Words | 2 Pages

There is a myth that deciding to attend a for-profit college represents a lack of cultural/social capital resources, rather than a rational, considered choice. I have found that the decision to attend one of these types of colleges is usually a well-planned process. A person might lack cultural and social capital resources, but that does not mean that they have not considered the pros and cons to this type of college and career starting path. For-profit colleges were specifically designed for people who need job security. There are specific market career paths that these schools offer that lead to the specific job the student wants, and that is why people choose to attend.

Read More
717 Words | 3 Pages

The use of God as a shield works on believers, but not on nonbelievers. The question “why bad things happening to good people” still cannot be answered for the nonbelievers, a common critique of religion itself. Regardless of the problem of theodicy, however, religion has worked really well to create and maintain the reality. Berger explains that it is because religion legitimates effectively. “Religion has been the historically most widespread and effective instrumentality of legitimation….

Read More
1161 Words | 5 Pages

Dayton, Tennessee July 1925, The State of Tennessee vs. John Thomas Scopes. One of the most publicized trials in American history that held a great impact on the argument between fundamentalists and modernists. The Scopes Trial is still one of the most significant trials in American history. It was actually a case that had a broader importance, rather than a case about evolution in schools and the case has left a lasting impression on America. The State of Tennessee vs. John Thomas Scopes took place in the hot summer of 1925 Dayton, Tennessee and featured the likes of John Scopes, Clarence Darrow, and William Jennings Bryan.

Read More
295 Words | 2 Pages

JL Mackie was persuasive in his argument by showing that belief in an almighty God is not rational. He proves this by posing the problem of evil. According to JL Mackie, if God exists and is omniscient, omnipotent, and good then evil would not exist. However, evil exists in this world, sometimes in the form of undeserved suffering (diseases that affect humans, earthquakes, famines ...) and others perpetrated by man (murders, wars ...). If God exists and has the capability to be powerful, good, omniscient and omnipotent, why would he let evil be perpetrated?

Read More
561 Words | 3 Pages

Upon arriving in the court Mary Warren says, “I cannot lie no more. I am with God, I

Read More

More about Rick Warren's Argument For The Existence Of God

Related Topics

Open Document