Roman Democracy Vs Athenian Democracy Essay

486 Words2 Pages

The societies of antiquity have been significant in shaping modern societies. Whilst exhibiting notions of fairness and equality, they were neither truly fair, equal nor representative (Green S, 2016). They have, however, contributed to our own ideas of a democratic society. For this essay I will focus on two societies that have helped shaped modern forms of government: the early Roman republic and Athenian democracy
The Roman Republic (c. 509–27 B.C.E) came into existence when a group of wealthy families succeeded (Crawford, M, 1992, p. 24) after the overthrow of the Etruscan kings. Magistrates took the place of the kings and made only moderate steps towards being fair and representative as they “spread power more widely among the rich and powerful.” (Boatwright M.T, 2004, p. 49) In a show …show more content…

507-338 B.C.E) operated as a direct democracy that ruled Athens and the adjacent region of Attica. This form of democracy allowed true citizens -free adult males of Athenian origin- (Bulliet et al, 2011, p.101) to attend assembly meetings to vote, listen to and discuss laws that affected important matters. All who attended the meetings were paid, which was an incentive to include the poorer citizens, however, equality was a political concept that never extended to social spheres (Hansen, M. H, 1999, p81.) Women, slaves, and migrants made up the majority of the population, but did not enjoy the privileges of citizenship, (Wood, E.M, p.60) leaving the male population of 30,000 - 40,000 out of a approximate population of 300,000 to vote. (Bulliet, 2011, p.101) With Athenian Democracy, the political process silenced women’s voices, and they found themselves confined to the role of housekeeper. In contrast to this, during the former Mycenaean Greece period (1600-1200 B.C.E), women played a pivotal role in society as they were held in high regard for their insight and wisdom into political and military affairs. (Cole, J, & Syme, C, 2014,