The stability of the Roman Republic and the Athenian Democracy is similar because they both had internal problems based on low income, yet the systems are different because participation in Rome was related to wealth, while participation in Athens wasn’t. To start, the stability of the Roman Republic and the Athenian Democracy was similar because they both had internal fights and reforms due to wealth.Specifically, the Gracchi brothers were a large part of the populares political group in Rome because of their efforts to redistribute land, set limits to the amount of land one can own, and make the state pay for military equipment, instead of the soldiers themselves.This represents how the Roman Republic had several problems regarding an unbalance in wealth. These were recognized by the Gracchi brothers, which led to such reforms.To continue, when many people of the lower classes were faced with debts, Solon proposed to cancel these charges, setting the people free from their burdens. This shows how those in Athens also had economic hardships, just like people in the Roman Republic. These troubles lead to the political …show more content…
In addition to the internal fights Rome and Athens faced, the civilization of Classical India also had problems such as these, including the lower castes’ dissatisfaction in Hinduism, resulting in the appreciation of Jainism and Buddhism. This is significant because people wanted rewards for their good actions in they life they were already in, not just when they are reincarnated. Therefore, this proves a common feeling among people in lower social classes of being treated fairer and having basic rights, which often results in such revisions and changes that have been a significant part of