ipl-logo

Roman Republic Essay

719 Words3 Pages

Introduction
Rome was run under a monarchy for the first two centuries of its founding, having lasted through a total of seven kings. During this time, Rome grew into a successful metropolis with the adoption of Etruscan technology and culture which may be attributed to its many Etruscan kings. This monarchy would come to an end after the overthrowing of their last king, bringing about the birth of the Roman Republic.

What circumstances led to the establishment of the Roman Republic?
Rome was founded in 753 BCE and operated as a monarchy up until its last king, Lucius Tarquinius Superbus was overthrown.

Throughout the Roman monarchy, its nobles have been gaining power and were growingly displeased at Tarquinius's attempt to diminish their …show more content…

The final straw was when his son Sextus Tarquinius raped a daughter of powerful Roman nobles, Lucretia (The Establishment of the Roman Republic, n.d).

Which elements of the Republic made it democratic?
According to Longley (2022), the main difference between a democracy and a republic is how much control the people have over making laws. In a Republic, the laws are made by the elected representatives of the people, while in a democracy, the laws are made by the majority.

Rome's Republic combined three types of governing elements to form its Republic, democracy, aristocracy and monarchy (Structure of the Republic, …show more content…

Other assemblies had specific purposes and were limited to certain groups of citizens (Structure of the Republic, n.d).

The tribunes, which was made up of plebeians - free Roman citizens who were part of the lower class of society. They preside over the assembly and have the power to keep the consuls in check (Structure of the Republic, n.d).

The Consuls, two of the highest offices in the Republic must be elected each year to serve a one-year term of office. The consuls had the power to veto each other's decisions and did not make laws or judgements but can only act on laws created by the assembly (Structure of the Republic, n.d).

Which elements made you question the Republic’s democratic nature?
As the republic wasn't fully democratic, elements of undemocratic processes were also present:

Limited suffrage, although Rome had in place a voting system, voting rights were only given to adult male citizens of Rome, this means that women, slaves and non-Roman residents were left out of its democratic voting

Show More
Related
327 Words | 2 Pages

Rome’s constitution had three different elements which held independent powers and shared their ideas to prove the constitution was democratic. The consuls and magistrates were the supreme masters of government and called together the People’s Assemblies to carry out whatever the majority of what the Assemblies decided (Doc A). Polybius also greatly admired how the Romans structured their

Read More
690 Words | 3 Pages

The Roman Republic was often known for its lasting influence for the development of Western political governance and ideals and is often hailed as a beacon of democracy in ancient history. But an in depth look reveals it to be more complex. While the Roman Republic held democratic elements that allowed citizen participation and representation, its political structure was ultimately characterized by a significant concentration of power among the elite and few for the average person. This essay will explore the extent of democracy within the Roman Republic, analyzing key aspects such as the electoral system, legislative bodies, and social hierarchy and the democratic nature and the implications it had on the overall governance of the state.

Read More
515 Words | 3 Pages

Despite its name, the Roman Republic was actually quite a mix of both a republic and a democracy. This is said because they used a bottom-up system, allowing even the people with little roles to vote, such as The Assembly. They would vote for their leaders and laws, among other things, as well. One of the main factors in having a republic government is to not have the people involved in selecting leaders, but the Roman Republic did just that. A person cannot say that a republic is a republic if they allow the people to vote because having the people vote is a major part of democracy.

Read More
440 Words | 2 Pages

Imperial Rome had a democratic government, where the people voted for everything. They had two classes, the patricians and the plebeians. The Plebeians had all the control over the Senate and the Consuls for a while. Eventually, the plebeians were given control over the Tribunes to give them a voice. The patricians were the wealthy, land owners, and the upper class citizens.

Read More
736 Words | 3 Pages

The Roman Republic lasted from 509 B.C.E to 27 B.C.E. The Roman Republic was democratic, but not always. Such as when the wealthy took over, it was more difficult to become a Roman citizen, and there was a lot of division in the society. However it was still democratic because they let the majority of legal men vote, even the free slaves later on, the people had a voice, and everyone mainly had a job to do in order to help the community. The Roman Republic tried to be democratic, but then it led to it just being an aristocracy.

Read More
616 Words | 3 Pages

Rome started as a republic and ended as a dictatorship. The empires in Rome were the world's greatest empire. These empires started around 750 BCE. Around 200 BCE the Greek empire was weakening and Rome was getting stronger.

Read More
421 Words | 2 Pages

The Roman Republic greatly influence the many forms of government that came after it, its many contributions to government significantly impacted modern day governments of today. Yet to understand it we must first find knowledge to how the Roman Republic came to be. The answer is fairly simple, due to the harsh rule of the Etruscan they were kicked out of Rome and the Romans formed the Rome Republic. Yet, the Rome Republic developed over time, it when through refinements as time passed. Such things as the Senate, magistrates, tripartite, checks and balances are some of the examples that the Roman Republic influenced on modern U.S. government.

Read More
908 Words | 4 Pages

This shift was not in the form of a sudden revolution, and rather grew as a gradual switch from a monarchy previously under the Etruscans. The republic stood for liberty and extended citizenship of the people. In the Roman republic, the people chose officials to represent their interests. Dominating the government was a senate that was primarily made up of the wealthy, landholding class, known as patricians. This outraged the lower class plebeians, who later gained power and elected their own officials.

Read More
1162 Words | 5 Pages

During the rule of the Roman Republic, most governmental power was given to the Senate, however, the people often needed one true leader. “In times of military emergency, when unity of command was sometimes necessary, Rome appointed a dictator” Since the people of the Roman Republic wanted a sole leader to completely unify them in times of hardship, it would only make sense to have a single ruler at all times to keep the Roman people from dividing. The government of Rome already knew how to shift from the power being in the hands of a sole leader because the government was made so it could be controlled by one person, so even though this was a major change, the government was already built to be able to handle it. The empire continued to have key features of the republic that increased stability. For example, the Senate continued from the government of the Roman Republic to the

Read More
431 Words | 2 Pages

Democracy is what we call a formation of government where citizens and group of people can vote on laws. The Roman Republic did not have a well developed formation of their government but it did have the qualifications of democracy. There were pros and cons of voting in the Roman times such as anybody can vote. According to Professor Millar, he says, “Every adult male citizen, unless specifically disqualified, had a vote, and there was no formal exclusion of the poor. Free slaves could also vote.”

Read More
271 Words | 2 Pages

Romes Democratic society The Roman republic was a very democratic society because the citizens elected representatives to rule on their behalf, every citizen was expected to play an active role in governing the state, and because it was ruled by many. The Roman republic was a very democratic society because the citizens elected representatives to rule on their behalf. At first the Romans were ruled by the Etruscans until they overthrew their conquerors.

Read More
445 Words | 2 Pages

The Roman government developed as it did because of the patricians, being put into a position of power due to their wealth, while the plebians and noncitizens could give close to no input on what could and could not happen in their republic. The patricians forced the idea upon the government that only their ideas and opinions mattered, which is how they were able to become so powerful in the Roman government. An example of this can be found in a speech from a Roman senator, in which he states, “let not the wary opinions of the common people deter you in what is best for Rome. It is we (the patricians) that have the power… we are the only ones truly qualified,” (Maganamus 1).

Read More
534 Words | 3 Pages

Democracy in Ancient Rome Ancient Rome is often portrayed as a highly democratic society for the ancient world. After all, the United States’ government is modeled after some parts of the Roman’s structure of government. But,was Rome as democratic as is is commonly thought to be? Contrary to what people may think Rome’s democracy wasn't exactly so democratic for all of its citizens. One example of Rome’s confusing concept of democracy can be found in The Histories, which was written by the Greek historian Polybius in 119 BCE.

Read More
128 Words | 1 Pages

There were many different interconnected political offices available in the Roman Republic. There were three major branches: an executive branch consisting of two consuls, the senate, and multiple popular assemblies. The consuls served for one year, and they “ acted as head of the Republic, commanded the army, presided over the Senate and assemblies, executed decrees, and represented the Republic in foreign affairs.”. In the case of emergency, one consul member could become dictator for six months to solve an immediate crisis. Then there was the senate, which held the majority of the decision making power.

Read More
693 Words | 3 Pages

The Roman Republic was an ancient Roman civilization that was created after the overthrow of the Roman Kingdom in 509 BC, and ending in 27 BC with the creation of the Roman Republic. The Roman Republic was created in order for the rich men named aristocrats to gain even more power by removing kings from the Roman government. Soon after, the Roman upper class turned politics into a violent competition in their strive for power. Gaius Marius’ creation of “client armies” led soldiers to become more loyal towards their commander than the republic. This resulted in a commander named Lucius Cornelius Sulla overtaking Rome with his client army and establishing himself as a dictator.

Read More

More about Roman Republic Essay

Related Topics

Open Document