ipl-logo

Roth Case Summary

750 Words3 Pages

Samuel Roth, a literary business owner, was convicted in a District Court on charges of violating the federal obscenity statute by advertising an erotic novella. Roth’s first conviction was affirmed by the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. On a similar note, David Alberts, who ran a mail-order business in Los Angeles and, was charged for violating the California Penal Code after a complaint that he was selling obscene books. His conviction was also affirmed by an Appellate Department of the Superior Court of the State of California. Roth appealed to the Supreme Court on grounds that his obscene material was protected under the free speech provision of the First Amendment. Both cases were combined and argued that the laws by which they were convicted violated the First Amendment. The Court’s decision was six to three in Roth, and seven to two in Alberts. Legal questions: 1. Is obscenity protected under the First Amendment of the constitution? Holdings: No, obscenity is not protected under the free speech provision of the First Amendment of the Constitution. According to the Court’s decision, both trial courts followed the proper standard and …show more content…

United States, because the question is being whether the federal obscenity statute violates the First Amendment of the constitution, is different from one dealing with state legislation under the Fourteenth Amendment. The federal government should not be allowed to suppress an individual only because the state has also done it. Justice Harlan states that since the government may protect itself from any revolution, the federal government then has the power to deprive speeches that threaten that security. Nevertheless, given that these cases deal with obscenity, they deal directly with the States, and not the federal government mainly because Congress has no power over sexual moralities. Justice Harlan does not support this conviction being

Show More
Related
545 Words | 3 Pages

Supreme Court Case in a Bag Snyder v. Phelps On his way to his son 's funeral, Albert Snyder could see the tops of picketers’ signs, but never knew what had been written on them until watching a news broadcast later that night. Fred Phelps and some of his followers from the Westboro Baptist church were picketing on public land a few hundred feet from the funeral of Marine Lance Corporal Matthew Snyder. The picketers displayed signs stating things that could be found offensive and personally targeting the Snyder family.

Read More
781 Words | 4 Pages

That is what caused this whole argument between the court and Justice Harlan on whether

Read More
669 Words | 3 Pages

From two different court decision showed us how Individual liberty may be limited by the state power. The district court was decided in favor of the Fourteenth Amendment, which addresses the equal protection of the laws. The liberal view on one’s Liberty. On the other hand, the federal district court result was in favoring of the conservative view on liberty. From the leading opinion of Justice White, he believes that although the incident occurred privately in Hardwick’s home, but it does not change the fact that the act of sodomy still violates the law, therefore the right of privacy should affect the result of this

Read More
533 Words | 3 Pages

The South Carolina vs. Katzenbach case was established based off the U.S. Supreme Court on the Voting Rights Act of 1965. On March 1965, the Voting Rights Act offered the federal government new powers to fight the alienation of African Americans prolonged by the southern government. Many Southerners didn’t approve Congress’ decision to pass this legislation. The people of the south argued and believed that the U.S congress had violated their states’ rights.

Read More
276 Words | 2 Pages

I. Issue: Morse vs. Frederick, 2002; Frederick, a high school senior, hung a banner saying: “Bong Hits 4 Jesus” at a school supervised activity. Morse, the principal, suspended him for 10 days saying the banner promoted illegal drug use to those attending the school supervised activity. Frederick sued Morse saying his First Amendment rights were violated. Issue: Does the First Amendment allow public school to prohibit students from displaying banners with messages promoting use of illegal drugs at school supervised activities? II.

Read More
157 Words | 1 Pages

Prior to this case, a New York ruling permitted the banning of motion pictures if they were deemed sacrilegious. Burstyn was part of a distribution company and owned the exclusive rights to distribute the Italian film “The Miracle” throughout the United States. After about eight weeks of exhibition, the NYS Board of Regents received hundreds of messages against the shoeing of the film. After reviewing the film, the board deemed it sacrilegious and it’s license was rescinded. Burstyn brought the action to the New York courts, claiming that it was a violation of the Fourteenth Amendment and that the term sacrilegious was too vague and indefinite.

Read More
249 Words | 1 Pages

Prior Restraint in the early 20th century was certainly different than it is today. In today’s publications legal action against free speech is of the post facto type, which means a message can be sent or delivered before the government can initiate an action against it. Prior restraint illustrates the principle of gatekeeping “like a gate on a channel, the intermediary gatekeeper allows some messages to get through and bar others” (238). In 1925 Minnesota legislature made an approval of a prior restraint law and it stated “obscene, lewd and lascivious or malicious, scandalous and defamatory publication was guilty of a nuisance and could be stopped by court order from further publication or distribution” (238). By doing this the law was tested

Read More
435 Words | 2 Pages

Facts: The Congress enacted the Child Pornography Prevention Act (CPPA) in 1996 to prohibit “any visual depiction, including any photographs, film, video, picture, or computer –generated images that visually seem to have a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct.” New York v. Ferber distinguished child pornography from other explicit speech due to the State’s interest in keeping children protected from exploitation during any visual production process. Pornography can only be banned if considered obscene, which was determined during the Ferber Case. In the case of Miller v. California,) Ferber did not want to reflect on what the state considered obscene. Ferber was more interested in prosecuting those who promote the

Read More
503 Words | 3 Pages

COMM 3310 – LEGAL CASE BRIEF CASE NAME: Federal Communications Commission v. Fox Television Stations, Inc. CITATION/DATE: 10-1293 U.S. (2012) LEVEL OF COURT: Supreme Court FACTS: Between 2002 and 2003 Fox Television Stations aired its golden globe award show where actress Cher used the F-word and Nichole Richie used the S-word. ABC also as respondents violated FCC rule on nudity where in its show NYPD blue adult nudity was portrayed. The Federal Communications Commission had in 2004 changed its policy on fleeting expletives at the same duration and deemed Fox television liable for the utterances.

Read More
1653 Words | 7 Pages

In 1972, one of the most iconic court cases about capital punishment was decided on: Furman v. Georgia. It considered both the constitutionality of the death penalty and its adverse effects on minority groups. The controversy of this decision was backed up by more than 200 pages of concurrences and dissents, culminating in a one page decision. In this decision, the Court nullified all existing capital punishment laws and pardoned everybody on death row. To reinstate the death penalty, states had to satisfy the Eighth Amendment by removing all “discriminatory” and “arbitrary” effects.

Read More
251 Words | 2 Pages

I believe that the author’s thesis is about the issue of censorship and how it impacts our First Amendment. The author presents us a two different perspective of the issue. Such as, our practice of our First Amendment can lead us to a place where someone can create materials that we may find offensive. But are protected by the First Amendment at the same time could have people who want to limit offensive material and therefore, through censorship are limiting the First Amendment rights of others. To demonstrate her point, Susan Jacoby, interviewed a small sample of women to gather their perspective about an image from a Playboy magazine.

Read More
894 Words | 4 Pages

AID required that parties interested in receiving funding to combat HIV and AIDS adopt stances opposing prostitution across the globe. The justice system ruled against this requirement: ruling that an organization cannot require others to adopt a certain belief or policy to gain benefit (Supreme Court). Both of these cases are similar in the fact that they have required our Supreme Court to read between the lines, interpreting the First Amendment to make accurate decisions relating to the people’s freedom of expression. Although our justice system ruled in favor of the people’s rights in both of these examples, a worrying precedent may be set as a result of these contemporary court cases. Can the freedoms given to the people in the First Amendment be interpreted to apply to a variety of disputes, disputes that might be deemed illegal if not applied to the freedom of

Read More
1919 Words | 8 Pages

In 1982 three books written by three very different women; Maya Angelou, Anne Frank, and Doris Day were placed in cages at the American Booksellers Association's annual convention (Zalusky np). The display called attention to the practice of book banning. In his book Banned Books: Challenging Our Freedom to Read, Robert Doyle wrote: Up until that day when they witnessed the display of books behind bars, the members of the professional association - the authors, publishers, booksellers, librarians, and journalists attending the convention - were all unaware that so many books and such familiar titles were removed from bookstore and library shelves because an individual or group thought the printed matter unfit for others to read. To the spectators the implication was clear - it was readers who were being caged, not just books. (qtd.

Read More
467 Words | 2 Pages

In 1998, a minor in Livermore, California downloaded a pornographic image from their library computer. The parents attempted to sue the library claiming that they needed to install a filter. The case was dismissed by the state superior court, but internet censorship was beginning to become a major social issue. In November of the same year, a federal judge in Virginia removed a law from effect that enforced a public library to install filtering software on both adult’s and children’s computers. The policy was withdrawn due to its violation of the first amendment.

Read More
799 Words | 4 Pages

Obscenity, in terms, refers to, “any utterance or act that strongly 0ffends the prevalent morality of the time.” Derived from the Latin obscaena (offstage) a cognate of the Ancient Greek root skene, because some potentially offensive content, such as murder or sex, was depicted offstage in classical drama, the word can be used to indicate a strong moral repugnance. In other words, the word can also be said to mean “the character or quality of being obscene or any act, utterance, or item tending to corrupt the public morals by its indecency or lewdness.” Talking in legal terms, obscenity applies to anything 0ffensive to morals and is often equated with the term Pornography. But it is important to note that there is a line of difference between obscenity and pornography.

Read More

More about Roth Case Summary

Open Document