Recommended: Royal Dutch Shell case study answers
Michael Terceiro, 'ACCC v Ticketek - a non-event?' (2012) 64(3) Keeping Good Companies 158-161
In the case Lindner Fund v. Abney there was a corporation located in Phoenix, Arizona called Texscan Corporation. This company was audited by Coopers & Lybrand (Cooper) in which reviewed financial records. One of the investors of Texscan was Lindner Funds and after receiving and reviewing the audited financial material from Texscan, Lindner Funds made the decision to invest in Texscan. But there was an unknown reason Texsca, suffered financial difficulties and Lindner suffered as well.
The Corporate Social Responsibility of the company is responsible for the welfare of society. The company did not think about the community. Thus, the company had to face the title of being unethical resulting in losing its
COMES NOW R. Mark Armstrong, pro se (“Plaintiff”), and hereby files a Complaint and Demand for Jury Trial. The causes of action include but are not limited to: 1) Qua Tam (Claims A, B and C) Federal Water Pollution Control Act (FWPCA) (1972) [33 U.S.C. § 1367] : Solid Waste Disposal Act (SWDA) (1976) [42 U.S.C. § 6971] : FCA, 31 U.S.C. 3730(b)-(g) 2)Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”) 18 U.S.C. §1961 et seq., 3) Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 (Claim A) First Amendment as controlled by Garcetti_v._Ceballos Violations, (Claim B) Fourteenth Amendment Violations, 4) Retaliation under 31 U.S.C. § 3730(h), 5) Intentional infliction of emotional distress, for prima facie tort Tortuous Breach of Implied Covenant
Bill McKibben and Derrick Jensen were born in 1960 in the U.S.A., and both have accomplished successful academic backgrounds. McKibben graduated from Harvard University in 1982, and Derrick Jensen graduated from the Colorado School of Mines with a degree in Mineral engineering in 1983. Both are environmental activists and have written many articles and books. Two of their articles “Waste Not, Want Not” by Bill McKibben and “Forget Shorter Showers” by Jensen are published in the Bedford Reader book (557-567). When we analyze these articles both authors agree on consumers contribution to environmental pollution, but they have different points of views concerning whether individuals or industrialists cause more environmental pollution.
n 2013 Dow Company lost a lawsuit case where they were federally ordered to pay $1.2 billion. The case originally started in 2005; a class action lawsuit was brought against the company alleging that they were price-fixing, an illegal act where companies agree to keep the price level of an item the same. Dow Company has consistently denied all allegations of fixing the price of chemicals. Originally the company was only ordered to pay $400 million, but Dow submitted a request to overturn the judgment, which in turned, caused damages to rise to $1.2 billion due to the antitrust laws, laws ensuring fairness and good faith competition among businesses. Dow is trying to appeal the verdict.
The plaintiff, claimed that it was defendant’s duty to have a system of work and inspection sufficient to prevent snails getting in to ginger beer
Legitimacy theory is a “positive theory” that asserts that businesses are bound by the implicit “social contract” that the corporation agrees to perform that are specifically relating to social and environmental issues (Rankin, et al. 2012, 142). To remain congruent with societal values in which it operates, a corporation can address attributes that relate to this theory through voluntary social and environmental disclosures made on platforms like its annual report (Coebergh 2011, 65). Virgin Australia has various groups of important stakeholders who can affect or is affected by both the actions and activities of the corporation (Laasch and Conaway 2014, 97). They are namely, guests, employees, investor groups and shareholders, unions, non-government
They have two types of business – downstream and upstream. Downstream business encloses British gas which is a leader in residential energy and services provider in Britain and Direct Energy, which is one of North
Because of this violation Shell Chemical LP will install a $10 million pollution monitoring and control system at its Norco, Louisiana, chemical plant as part of a settlement over allegations it violated the Clean Air Act. The Settlement involves the reduction of air pollution from four industrial flares at the Norco facility. Shell's Norco facility is approximately 20 miles northeast of New Orleans. The facility manufactures ethylene, propylene, and butadiene to sell to other manufacturers for use in the production of antifreeze, tires, plastic food containers, trash bags, laundry detergent, cosmetics, adhesives, coatings, and hundreds of other consumer and industrial materials and products. The facility operates 24 hours a day, every day of the
I. Background and Company Analysis ________________________________________ Patagonia, founded by Yvon Chouinard in 1971, is an outdoor apparel company that has successfully integrated green elements into almost every business activity, from R&D to human resources management, to reduce harm to the environment. These elements firmly align with the corporate objectives of enhancing product and service quality, reducing environmental impacts and having constant innovation. These practices not only enable Patagonia to create values to its customers, but also help the company differentiate itself as innovative leader in the green segment of the industry. A. Orsato’s Framework - Competitive Environmental Strategies Patagonia should be considered
Since BP was the main operator of the Macondo project, BP will be the starting point for my research. In the first part of this study, I will describe BP as a company. I will discuss his business, the services they offer, and the industries in which they compete. By analyzing the business environment of BP, I can identify companies that may be affected indirectly by the oil spill, such as: For example, their competitors, suppliers and oilfield service providers. To understand changes in returns for the shareholders of the affected companies, we must first understand the scale of the economic consequences of the oil spill.
Introduction This case study explores the acquisition of the Body Shop, which is one of the largest franchise cosmetics companies in the world, by L’Oreal. The main concentration of the case study aims at investigating the impact on business ethics and corporate social responsibility by the concentricity of the Body Shop and L’Oreal and how the general attitude and buying behaviour is distorted in the course of this acquisition. L‘Oreal being the big conglomerate in the cosmetics industry acquired the Body Shop International which is comparably small but having iconic brand of environmental and socially responsible concerns, on 17 March 2006, through a covenant of $1.2 billion. The combination of two brands in a newly formed conglomerate implies a combination of values, principles and associations that might affect a company’s appeal. The verity that L 'Oreal 's acquisition of the Body Shop provides plenty of potential growth opportunities is undeniable; nevertheless the question of how well the acquisition sits in the group of the world 's largest cosmetics company is another matter.
Here you look on the difference between benefits and harms for the society and if the benefits are greater than the decision or an action is considered as ethical, if lower – unethical. Here it is important to identify the stakeholders and an effects on them from actions or decisions of a company. “You can think of a stakeholder as a person or organization that can affect or be affected by your organization. Stakeholders can come from inside or outside of the organization. Examples of stakeholders of a business include customers, employees, stockholders, suppliers, non-profit community organizations, government, and the local community among many others.”
In the Oil & Gas Industry the competition is significantly intensive, with the market being ruled by big giants such as Exxon Mobil, Total, ConocoPhillips, British Petroleum, Chevron and the Royal Dutch Shell etc. Appendix A shows the market values of these super majors. The market is over ruled by three different types of players. 1.
