ipl-logo

Rule Deontological Ethical Theory Essay

899 Words4 Pages

4.1 Act Deontological Ethical Theory This is a theory that accords logical priority to particular moral judgements, rather than to rules or principles, according to a handout from the University of Washington (n.d.). It can be summarized as “Do the right thing!”. 4.2 Rule Deontological Ethical Theory According to a handout from the University of Washington (n.d.), this is a deontological theory that accords logical priority to rules, rather than to particular judgements or to principle. An example of a rule deontological ethical theory is the ethical theory according to W.D. Ross. Ross or William David Ross is a Scottish philosopher. He was the one who worked on “The Right and the Good”. In a consequentialist view, an action is based …show more content…

An example of this theory is one by John Rawls which is called as the Rawlsian principle. John Rawls was an American political philosopher in the liberal tradition. Rawls conceptualized the idea of justice as fairness which is described as a society of citizens which has equal basic rights or simply, justice at its center. This principle states that one ought to be willing to cooperate on fair terms of social cooperation. This would guarantee a just and morally acceptable society. The theory of justice revolves around the two fundamental principles. The first one guarantees the right of each person to have the most extensive basic liberty compatible with the liberty of others. We should be able to design and evaluate social institutions and practices on the basis of Rawls’ basis of principles justice. All person in a society should be given and should be able to receive equal distribution of rights in terms of political, social and economic goods. This is described as strict egalitarianism. But Rawls does not encourage strict egalitarianism. Rawls stated that the inequalities are inevitable which can be minimized and justified. This can be done through the first one of the two fundamental principles of the original position. The second one states that social and economic positions are to be one to everyone’s …show more content…

The principle requires to give all of the people, access to goods and positions given fair equality and opportunity based on the need and merit. These are some of the natural duties which was identified by Rawls: duties of justice, avoiding harm to others, promise keeping, and helping others in need. These duties suggest and support principles such as no maleficence, fidelity, beneficence, respect for persons and a form of procedural justice. This ethical theory is said to be obviously applicable only to ethical issues in the larger health care system which involves health policy and allocation of resources according to Regis

Show More
Related

John Rawls Philosophy

901 Words | 4 Pages

In his book A Theory of Justice he explained his idea of “Original position”, in which every person must know what features about justice and fairness are relevant and which ones are not in order to have a proper critique to a society. Theory of justice is an essay that begins with the assumption

Read More

Famine Affluence And Morality Analysis

1790 Words | 8 Pages

Rawls was not happy whit the original arguments about what makes a social institution just. The utilitariam argument says that societies should pursue the greatest good for the greatest number. This argument has many problems, excpecially that it seems to be consistant with the belief of majorities over minorities. The institution argument holds that human intuit what is wright or wrong by some innate moral sense. Rawls attempts to provide a good account of social justice through the social contract approach.

Read More

Nasw Code Of Ethical Dilemmas

762 Words | 4 Pages

This theory is based on natural laws, common sense, intuition, and duties. This theory considers the greatest good for the greatest number. It judges morality of action based on adherence to rules. It informs you to follow the rules, because the rules bind you to your duty. In an ethical dilemma, this theory is used to emphasize motive.

Read More

The Life And Legacy Of Robert Gould Shaw

775 Words | 4 Pages

Rawls’ idea of justice as fairness, which he presented in his book, “A Theory of Justice,” emphasizes the importance of equal opportunities and equal distribution of wealth and resources in society. This idea resonates with me because, as someone who values fairness and equality, I believe that everyone should have the same chance to succeed and live a fulfilling life. Rawls’ work has taught me to be more aware of societal inequalities and to work towards creating a fairer and more just

Read More

John Rawls Theory Of Justice Research Paper

758 Words | 4 Pages

A theory however elegant and economical must be rejected or revised if it is untrue” (Rawls Theory of Justice). Justice is an immutable character that cannot be transferred or withheld from certain people, not even for the sake of the “greater good.” Each individual has a right to justice as much as they do to air; it is a basic principle of being alive. If our institutions and laws, though sworn to uphold and protect justice, violate our innate rights, then they must be overturned to service the needs of justice over politics. Our government, specifically our legislative branch, was built to preserve the quality of justice in our country and to protect the rights of the people.

Read More

John Rawlss: The Most Just Theory Of Justice

1036 Words | 5 Pages

The most just Theory of Justice The answers to the question “What is justice?” are various and it is very difficult to agree on one answer. John Rawls, an American liberal philosopher, aimed to find a universal answer to this question that everybody would agree on (Pierik, 2015b). He assumes that it is possible to find a mutual answer by employing his social contract method when everybody would be hypothetically put into an equal position. What is the answer emerging from such a situation and how is it applicable to real-life topics such as the transnational clinical trials?

Read More

John Rawls: A Theory Of Justice

4259 Words | 18 Pages

The shape and content of both political and social philosophy has been significantly revolutionized since the emergence of John Rawls’ ideas. His’ A Theory of Justice’, most significantly, has been a rich source of ideas which continue to impact contemporary discussions about society and politics. Rawls 's Theory of Justice is extensively considered as one of this century 's most important pieces of political philosophy. The renowned philosopher’s ideology takes as its starting point the argument that "the most reasonable principles of justice are those everyone would accept and agree to from a fair position". By using a similar alternative to the social contract, in his Theory of Justice, Rawls addresses the problem of distributive justice.

Read More

John Rawls's View Of Social Justice In Society

1290 Words | 6 Pages

The claim that rational individuals behind a veil of ignorance would choose the greatest possible equality has been challenged as arbitrary and unverifiable. Rational individuals might well choose a social structure with large rewards for the majority of people and small rewards for the minority on the grounds that one is more likely to end up as part of a majority than a minority. Moreover, the veil of ignorance of where one will be in a society also takes away all knowledge of what one will do. Legal justice is generally considered a matter of appropriate responses to actions: In the version offered by Rawls, justice is detached from anything that anyone has done and thus may have nothing to do with any idea of what people

Read More

Ethical System: Utilitarianism And Deontological Ethics

650 Words | 3 Pages

Utilitarianism and Deontological Scientist defined utilitarian ethical system measures the ethics of a specific action based on the consequences of the action, however, deontological ethical system determines the ethics of an action caused from individual’s responsibility or duty (Moreland, 2016). According to utilitarianism, people is considered to be ethical, when there action or decision leads to happiness, however, their action can be easily predicted and it can be judge as well. Researchers believed that deontology involves on people’s immoral actions because their action tends to spread into a general rule of society. It is determined that deontology ethics cannot determine an indivdual action with unconditional belief, however, utilitarianism

Read More

Utilitarianism Vs Deontological Ethics Essay

524 Words | 3 Pages

Deontological ethics is a morals framework that judges whether an action is correct or wrong according to an ethical code. The results of those moves are not being given any thought.. This morals framework is proposed to be exact and by the book. Making the best choice intends to take after legitimate rules of conduct and, thus, advocate fairness and equality. On the other hand, utilitarian moral framework holds that what’s ethical is whatever maximizes total happiness while minimizing total pain.

Read More

Four Theories Of Justice Course Analysis

981 Words | 4 Pages

Throughout this course we have read about many different philosophers and their theories of justice. Utilitarianism, libertarianism, rawlsianism, and Sandal’s virtue of ethics are the main four theories of justice that we examined and compared to everyday life this course. Every single person has their own theory of justice and because of that; each of these theories have their positive aspects and each of them have their negative aspects or problems. After learning about the four different theories I have put some ideas together to create a theory of my own from the theories I learned. The first theory that we learned about in this course was utilitarianism.

Read More

John Rawls Social Justice

667 Words | 3 Pages

John Rawls was a man who assumed a persuasive part in political idea in the late twentieth century, according to Rawls, behind our ignorance, we want to be treated equally and respected, we don’t want to feel persecuted, even If it gives pleasure to the majority, meaning that utilitarianism should not be involved in the concept. Rawls mentions two principals of justice, the first one is that everyone should have indistinguishable rights and his second was that each decision made should benefit everybody, furthermore Rawls contends his beliefs of justice saying that liberty and equality must happen to have a reasonable and fair society.

Read More

John Rawls: The Benefits Of Natural Talents

913 Words | 4 Pages

John Rawls believed that if certain individuals had natural talents, they did not always deserve the benefits that came with having these abilities. Instead, Rawls proposed, these inherent advantages should be used to benefit others. Although Rawls makes an excellent argument on why this should be the case, not all philosophers agreed with his reasoning, especially Robert Nozick. Nozick believed in distributing benefits in a fair manner in accordance with the Entitlement Theory, which has three subsections: Just Acquisition, Just Transfer and Just Rectification.

Read More

John Rawls Theory Of Civil Disobedience

1348 Words | 6 Pages

Rawls’ first principle of justice outlines that social institutions in a just society must aim for maximum equal liberty (Rawls, p. 82). His second principle, the difference principle, justifies inequality, but only when it maximally benefits those who are worse off (Rawls, pp. 65-66). Rawls ‘acknowledges that these principles are an oversimplification of distributive justice, but believes they should be applied to the basic structures of society (Rawls, p. 77). Rawls acknowledges that there needs to be regulations on when civil disobedience is justifiable.

Read More

John Rawls: Justice As Equality

1821 Words | 8 Pages

Distributive justice by definition deals with the distribution of benefits and burdens across members of a society. Over time, philosophers have argued how these benefits and burdens should be distributed as what results from them fundamentally affects people’s lives. John Rawls, an American moral and political philosopher argued as a liberal “Justice as Equality” by means of his three principles of justice: the principle of equal liberty, equal opportunity and difference. Liberals typically believe that government is necessary to protect individuals from harm by others, but also recognize that government itself can pose a threat to liberty (Minogue, Girvetz, Dagger & Ball, 2018). Rawls believed that everyone in society should have had equal political rights, although social and economic inequalities existed, but only under the condition that they were to the maximum advantage of the least advantaged people in society.

Read More

More about Rule Deontological Ethical Theory Essay

Related Topics

Open Document