ipl-logo

Rule Deontological Ethical Theory Essay

899 Words4 Pages

4.1 Act Deontological Ethical Theory This is a theory that accords logical priority to particular moral judgements, rather than to rules or principles, according to a handout from the University of Washington (n.d.). It can be summarized as “Do the right thing!”. 4.2 Rule Deontological Ethical Theory According to a handout from the University of Washington (n.d.), this is a deontological theory that accords logical priority to rules, rather than to particular judgements or to principle. An example of a rule deontological ethical theory is the ethical theory according to W.D. Ross. Ross or William David Ross is a Scottish philosopher. He was the one who worked on “The Right and the Good”. In a consequentialist view, an action is based …show more content…

An example of this theory is one by John Rawls which is called as the Rawlsian principle. John Rawls was an American political philosopher in the liberal tradition. Rawls conceptualized the idea of justice as fairness which is described as a society of citizens which has equal basic rights or simply, justice at its center. This principle states that one ought to be willing to cooperate on fair terms of social cooperation. This would guarantee a just and morally acceptable society. The theory of justice revolves around the two fundamental principles. The first one guarantees the right of each person to have the most extensive basic liberty compatible with the liberty of others. We should be able to design and evaluate social institutions and practices on the basis of Rawls’ basis of principles justice. All person in a society should be given and should be able to receive equal distribution of rights in terms of political, social and economic goods. This is described as strict egalitarianism. But Rawls does not encourage strict egalitarianism. Rawls stated that the inequalities are inevitable which can be minimized and justified. This can be done through the first one of the two fundamental principles of the original position. The second one states that social and economic positions are to be one to everyone’s …show more content…

The principle requires to give all of the people, access to goods and positions given fair equality and opportunity based on the need and merit. These are some of the natural duties which was identified by Rawls: duties of justice, avoiding harm to others, promise keeping, and helping others in need. These duties suggest and support principles such as no maleficence, fidelity, beneficence, respect for persons and a form of procedural justice. This ethical theory is said to be obviously applicable only to ethical issues in the larger health care system which involves health policy and allocation of resources according to Regis

Show More
Related
901 Words | 4 Pages

In his book A Theory of Justice he explained his idea of “Original position”, in which every person must know what features about justice and fairness are relevant and which ones are not in order to have a proper critique to a society. Theory of justice is an essay that begins with the assumption

Read More
1790 Words | 8 Pages

Rawls states in the article “the main idea is that society is rightly ordered, and therefor just, when its major institutions are arranged so as to achieve the greatest net balance of satisfaction summed over all the individuals belonging to

Read More
762 Words | 4 Pages

This theory is based on natural laws, common sense, intuition, and duties. This theory considers the greatest good for the greatest number. It judges morality of action based on adherence to rules. It informs you to follow the rules, because the rules bind you to your duty. In an ethical dilemma, this theory is used to emphasize motive.

Read More
775 Words | 4 Pages

Rawls’ idea of justice as fairness, which he presented in his book, “A Theory of Justice,” emphasizes the importance of equal opportunities and equal distribution of wealth and resources in society. This idea resonates with me because, as someone who values fairness and equality, I believe that everyone should have the same chance to succeed and live a fulfilling life. Rawls’ work has taught me to be more aware of societal inequalities and to work towards creating a fairer and more just

Read More
758 Words | 4 Pages

A theory however elegant and economical must be rejected or revised if it is untrue” (Rawls Theory of Justice). Justice is an immutable character that cannot be transferred or withheld from certain people, not even for the sake of the “greater good.” Each individual has a right to justice as much as they do to air; it is a basic principle of being alive. If our institutions and laws, though sworn to uphold and protect justice, violate our innate rights, then they must be overturned to service the needs of justice over politics. Our government, specifically our legislative branch, was built to preserve the quality of justice in our country and to protect the rights of the people.

Read More
1036 Words | 5 Pages

In this essay, it is argued that to achieve a truly fair conception of justice that could be applied to social and economic structure of society is only possible from the initial position of equality that ensures a complete dissociation from any knowledge about personal position in the society. Such a conception of justice leads to a just society that equally distributes the benefits of every member of such a community (Rawls, 1999: 3-19). This essay first elaborates on Rawls’s understanding of justice. The next part addresses why and how the veil of ignorance is crucial for the original position of equality and the importance of difference-principle emerging from this position.

Read More
4259 Words | 18 Pages

The shape and content of both political and social philosophy has been significantly revolutionized since the emergence of John Rawls’ ideas. His’ A Theory of Justice’, most significantly, has been a rich source of ideas which continue to impact contemporary discussions about society and politics. Rawls 's Theory of Justice is extensively considered as one of this century 's most important pieces of political philosophy. The renowned philosopher’s ideology takes as its starting point the argument that "the most reasonable principles of justice are those everyone would accept and agree to from a fair position". By using a similar alternative to the social contract, in his Theory of Justice, Rawls addresses the problem of distributive justice.

Read More
1290 Words | 6 Pages

The claim that rational individuals behind a veil of ignorance would choose the greatest possible equality has been challenged as arbitrary and unverifiable. Rational individuals might well choose a social structure with large rewards for the majority of people and small rewards for the minority on the grounds that one is more likely to end up as part of a majority than a minority. Moreover, the veil of ignorance of where one will be in a society also takes away all knowledge of what one will do. Legal justice is generally considered a matter of appropriate responses to actions: In the version offered by Rawls, justice is detached from anything that anyone has done and thus may have nothing to do with any idea of what people

Read More
981 Words | 4 Pages

Throughout this course we have read about many different philosophers and their theories of justice. Utilitarianism, libertarianism, rawlsianism, and Sandal’s virtue of ethics are the main four theories of justice that we examined and compared to everyday life this course. Every single person has their own theory of justice and because of that; each of these theories have their positive aspects and each of them have their negative aspects or problems. After learning about the four different theories I have put some ideas together to create a theory of my own from the theories I learned. The first theory that we learned about in this course was utilitarianism.

Read More
913 Words | 4 Pages

John Rawls believed that if certain individuals had natural talents, they did not always deserve the benefits that came with having these abilities. Instead, Rawls proposed, these inherent advantages should be used to benefit others. Although Rawls makes an excellent argument on why this should be the case, not all philosophers agreed with his reasoning, especially Robert Nozick. Nozick believed in distributing benefits in a fair manner in accordance with the Entitlement Theory, which has three subsections: Just Acquisition, Just Transfer and Just Rectification.

Read More
2052 Words | 9 Pages

THIS PROJECT HAS BEEN SUBMITTED BY ANANYA MISHRA 214026 ON THE TOPIC (JURISPRUDENCE) IN THE MONSOON SEMESTER 2016-17 INTRODUCTION: John Rawls developed a conception of justice as fairness in his classic work A Theory of Justice. Using elements of both Kantian and utilitarian philosophy, he has described a method for the moral evaluation of social and political institutions.

Read More
1635 Words | 7 Pages

However, it is argued that there are many flaws to Rawls’ theory of justice, particularly in relation to the “original position” and the basic structure of society as the primary subject of justice. This will be argued in the first half of this essay. Another flaw of Rawls’ arises in relation to his two principles of justice, the second principle in relation to distributive justice and the individual’s right to self-ownership. This will be discussed in the latter half of this essay and reinforced by the works of Robert Nozick. A concise conclusion will then be made in relation to Rawls’ theory of justice and whether it truly revived the social contract

Read More
1348 Words | 6 Pages

Rawls’ first principle of justice outlines that social institutions in a just society must aim for maximum equal liberty (Rawls, p. 82). His second principle, the difference principle, justifies inequality, but only when it maximally benefits those who are worse off (Rawls, pp. 65-66). Rawls ‘acknowledges that these principles are an oversimplification of distributive justice, but believes they should be applied to the basic structures of society (Rawls, p. 77). Rawls acknowledges that there needs to be regulations on when civil disobedience is justifiable.

Read More
962 Words | 4 Pages

Rule utilitarianism is more concerned with fairness and the law. The ultimate goal is to still satisfy and benefit the most people, but only through the most just and fairest means possible. A rule utilitarian seeks to benefit the most people but through the fairest and most just means available. The Deontiological ethical theory is that of duty, coming from the Greek word 'deon '.

Read More
1821 Words | 8 Pages

Distributive justice by definition deals with the distribution of benefits and burdens across members of a society. Over time, philosophers have argued how these benefits and burdens should be distributed as what results from them fundamentally affects people’s lives. John Rawls, an American moral and political philosopher argued as a liberal “Justice as Equality” by means of his three principles of justice: the principle of equal liberty, equal opportunity and difference. Liberals typically believe that government is necessary to protect individuals from harm by others, but also recognize that government itself can pose a threat to liberty (Minogue, Girvetz, Dagger & Ball, 2018). Rawls believed that everyone in society should have had equal political rights, although social and economic inequalities existed, but only under the condition that they were to the maximum advantage of the least advantaged people in society.

Read More

More about Rule Deontological Ethical Theory Essay

Related Topics

Open Document