ipl-logo

Ruth Benedict A Defense Of Ethical Relativism

747 Words3 Pages

R01365382
Ethical Relativism is the belief that what is morally right and wrong varies from culture to culture, or even from person to person. Ruth Benedict writes, “A Defense of Ethical Relativism”, in which she presents data she has collected to defend ethical relativism. In contrast, Louis Pojman writes, “A Critique of Ethical Relativism”, in which he presents various problems with ethical relativism. Ethical relativism is not a good way of deciding between what is morally right and what is morally wrong.
In, “A Defense of Ethical Relativism”, Ruth Benedict presents data that she has collected about different cultures around the world. Benedict goes on to explain that what we believe is morally right or wrong in our culture may be completely …show more content…

“No one civilization can possibly utilize in its mores the whole potential range of human behavior.” (Pg. 41) Benedict makes it clear throughout her writings that she believes that one society is not able to decide what is morally right or wrong for another society. Benedict believes that every society is built upon its own morals and values, so for one society to say what another society is doing is wrong is irrelevant because that society has its own set of values in which it follows. However, Louis Pojman would disagree with this …show more content…

Pojman uses Ted Bundy as an example of how this idea is extremely problematic. If one were to follow subjectivism, then they morally could not tell Ted Bundy what he was doing is wrong because in his own morale code it is morally right to commit the crimes that he committed. Conventionalism is, “the view that there are no objective moral principles but that all valid moral principles are justified (or are made true) by virtue of their cultural acceptance, recognizes the social nature of morality.” (Pg. 46) Pojman explains how this is also problematic because if one were to follow this idea, then reformers such as Martin Luther King Jr and even Jesus were immoral because they did not accept the morals that were set by

Show More
Related
198 Words | 1 Pages

According to benedict morality depends on each culture behavior, and how society mold

Read More
424 Words | 2 Pages

Moral Relativism, should it be abandoned or not? This was the original question that came to my mind when starting off reading this excerpt. Mary Midgley, the author of this story, mentioned that now days we as people deny that we will ever be able to understand a culture that is not our own. That got me thinking and as I was thinking I found what she said to be relatively true. I feel as if society has shaped us as young adults to judge our culture as being the best and all other cultures as coming up second best.

Read More
1377 Words | 6 Pages

This paper will attempt to summarize and explain the essay How to Argue about Disagreement: Evaluative Diversity and Moral Realism by John M. Doris and Alexandra Plakias. They claim that moral realism has a problem with its assertion that all disagreement is superficial, and would not persist under ideal conditions. They cite an experiment by Nisbett and Cohen in 1996 where there seems to be a fundamental disagreement between northern and southern white American men surrounding acceptable violence. Moral realism is the philosophical idea that morality is based in objective fact.

Read More
1103 Words | 5 Pages

According to Ethical Relativism, there are no universal truths, which apply to all human beings at all times, and proposes that moral principles should be viewed as "local, conventional, subjective and self-justified" (Yardley, 2012). While ethical principles should conform to social, cultural norms and moral beliefs and practices are frequently products of cultural upbringing, the basis for Ethical Relativism is fundamentally unsound because it can be used to justify and rationalize practices and behaviors that are inherently immoral, such as racism, discrimination, hate crimes and oppression. Ethical African

Read More
972 Words | 4 Pages

This view holds that there is no objective standard that can be used universally and that there is no way to determine what is right or wrong in a moral sense. Relativists believe that moral claims are dependent on context and that what is considered right or wrong in one culture may be different in another. Moral relativism is philosophical. The moral relativism viewpoint holds that there is no objective, universal standard of morality and that moral truths are relative to individual or cultural perspectives. Proponents of moral relativism argue that morality is a culturally constructed concept that varies from place to place and time to time.

Read More
986 Words | 4 Pages

According to Greek mythology, there are multiple deities with human flaws. In the Hebrew Bible, only God is described as being all-powerful. This contrast reflects a major difference between the two belief systems: in polytheism, power is dispersed among many, whereas in monotheism, one omnipotent God has the ultimate authority. The gods in the Greek creation story exercised their power based on fear, while the God in Genesis exercised his power out of love, thus demonstrating that he is an all-powerful being of authority that does not need to rely on fear.

Read More
102 Words | 1 Pages

Our moral beliefs indicate the kind of environment or culture we grew up in. Therefore, if we were born in Somalia, we would believe that it is morally right to go through female circumcision as a rite of passage. However, if we grew up in the western world, then we would not believe in female circumcision. We can therefore see the relativist 's argument of cultural relativism in this case, because if cultural relativism exists, then naturally, morality will also be relative. Additionally, to support his stance, the relativist will also argue that tolerance comes into play when it comes to cultural relativism.

Read More
709 Words | 3 Pages

This is because of moral relativism’s take on ethical dilemmas, and the view that there are a number of disagreements among people as to the nature of morality. An act can

Read More
1889 Words | 8 Pages

Writers like Alasdair MacIntyre, Bernard Williams and Philippa Foot have abandoned “the project of rationally justifying a single norm of flourishing life for and to all human beings.” They deny that ethics can have trans-cultural norms

Read More
1178 Words | 5 Pages

”(p.19) This shows that in the study of ethics, the study of moral relativism to be more specific, the idea of universal truth does not exist. That is to say what is perceived as “good” or “right” can vary form culture to culture, so there is no way to have one universal truth. Two major examples of cultural differences that are often cited in Support

Read More
1070 Words | 5 Pages

In this prompt the argument that Morality exists is irrelevant, contrary to our thoughts and beliefs. Everyone follows a set of moral rules. Ethical relativists disagree with this belief because, they believe that morals are distinctive from each individual culture. These relativists as described are mixing up moral and cultural distinctions, or are simply not willing to completely understanding the cultures they are standing up for. There are two different types of relativism Ethical, and Cultural, that rely upon the argument of cultural differences, which have flaws that make the argument unsound.

Read More
958 Words | 4 Pages

Normative ethics is crucial in decision-making in the criminal justice system and it is based on the notion that one should act morally using reason to determine the suitable way of conduct of self. Ethical relativism is part of normative ethics and it argues that what is morally right or wrong varies in a great deal from one person to another. The standards of conduct and methods of doing things differ from one society to another and there can never be a single standard of conduct for all societies; we must make ethical decisions therefore based on each situation. Relativism requires that we judge an individual who acted immorally by the standards of his culture and not our own (Cook, 1999). It is effective in just

Read More
1020 Words | 5 Pages

Every society has its own unique cultures in which people will have different ideas of moral codes. The diversity of these cultures cannot be said to be correct or incorrect. Every society has independent standards of ethic within their society and these standards are culture-bound. Cultural Relativism has a perception in which rightness or wrongness of an action depends entirely within the bounds of the culture. This theory opposes the belief in the objectivity of moral truth.

Read More
2321 Words | 10 Pages

In other words, “right” or “wrong” are culture specific, what is considered moral in one society may be considered immoral in another, and, since no universal standard of morality that exist, no one has the right to judge another societies custom (Ess, 2009). Cultural Relativism is closely related to ethical relativism, which views truth as variable and not absolute. What makes up right and wrong is determined solely by individual or the society (Ess, 2009). Since the truth is not object, there can be no standards which applies to all cultures.

Read More
2607 Words | 11 Pages

In general, on a popular argument for ethical relativism would be the untenability of objectivism. It is a persuasive justification for moral relativism because it is the best alternative following the failure of objectivism. The fact that moral objectivists themselves are uncertain, incongruent and unsettled on a standard moral system is the primary catalyst encouraging moral skepticism (IEP, Argument for Moral Relativism). Cultural relativism outlines that “an action is morally right, relative to a culture, just because it is right according to the moral code which is generally accepted in that culture.” Conversely, if “an action is morally wrong, relative to a culture, just because it is wrong according to the moral code which is generally accepted in that culture.”

Read More

More about Ruth Benedict A Defense Of Ethical Relativism

Related Topics

Open Document