Introduction This report is focused towards developing a defence statement for Mr STARMER and Mr MAULE who are charged against Section 8 of the Theft Act 1968. This defence statement would enable them to utilise their evidence and appear on the hearing at St Albans Magistrates’ Court on 02 Feb 2018 under the council of Stephen Seagrave. Defence Statement Mr STARMER and Mr MAULE has been charged in accordance to Section 8 of Theft Act 1968 which states that (1) Any person is found guilty of theft if stolen and immediately before or while doing so, and in order to do so, he uses force against any person, or makes or attempts to make any person afraid of to be like that (2) Persons who are guilty of robbery or physical assault with the intent …show more content…
(B) According to the code operator under Part 2, he has examined the prosecution case against the defendant. (3) In case the information consists of the prosecutor and the defendant. The prosecutor will disclose such information for this purpose - (a) by ensuring that the copy is made available. Or (b) if, in the opinion of the prosecutor, it is unenforceable or undesirable that the accused investigate at the appropriate time and place reasonably or by taking action to ensure that allowed to do so. (4) If the information contains unpublished information, the prosecutor will disclose such information to the prosecutor in the manner in which the prosecutor deems it appropriate and does not need to be in the same format as that recorded. For the purpose of this section, by securing it, record it in the form that it considers appropriate and (a) by maintaining a copy of the information. The opinion of the prosecutor is not practical or desirable by the accused was examined in a reasonable time and in a reasonable location, or by taking steps to maintain the safety of the accused. (5) Where the content does not contain the information disclosed by the prosecutor for the purposes of this section, the accused may examine it at a reasonable time and in a reasonable place or by taking steps to (6) Do not disclose the content under this section in the case where the Court of Appeal considers that in the public interest disclosure. And the order is not in the public