ipl-logo

Samuel Dred Scott Timeline

647 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Emancipation proclamation importance

Annotated Timeline Dred Scott
January 1799 -1832; Dred Scott’s birth and early life
Samuel Dred Scott was born into slavery and was owned by his master at the time Peter Blow and his wife Elizabeth, who all lived in Southampton County, Virginia. His birth date and details are roughly known and estimated. The Blows’ family and all other slaves that he owned including Scott, moved to Alabama where Scott works in a cotton plantation for 12 years. The Blows’ relocated to St. Louis Missouri giving up on farming and Dred Scott is then sold to Dr. John Emerson who was a surgeon in the United States Army.
December 1833- 1843; Dred Scott New Master – Dr. John Emerson
Dr. Emerson and Scott relocated from the Jefferson Barracks in St. Louis Missouri to Fort Armstrong, Illinois. Illinois was a free territory meaning that slavery was forbidden. Scott did not file for freedom nor live as a free man at the time. Dr. Emerson is then given new orders to relocate to Fort Snelling in Wisconsin. While living in Wisconsin, Scott met his wife Harriet Robinson who was also a slave from another army physician who he married in 1837. Dr. Emerson who was currently at the time …show more content…

Scott and his wife file for separate petitions with the court as their petitions are dismissed and their lawyer files for a new trial. Irene then hands over the Scott’s to the St. Louis County Sheriff to be their sole custody as slaves, while the case that Scott had previously filed with the court was being resolved. The court case had a ruling and the Scotts’ were freed from slavery. Mrs. Emerson was not pleased with the court’s ruling and she and her brother appealed the ruling with the Missouri Supreme court and a new trial was started and named – Dred Scott v. Irene Emerson. The Missouri supreme Court decides to reverse their own ruling and Scott and his family are no longer free but slaves again living in a free

Show More
Related

Roger B. Taney's History In The 1857 Dred Scott Case

561 Words | 3 Pages

Roger Brooke Taney made history in the 1857 Dred Scott Case by ruling that black slaves were not citizens of the United States. This controversial historical figure died on October 12, 1864, in Washington, D.C. One of Robert’s most famous quotes was "What Dred Scott's master might lawfully do with Dred Scott, in the free state of Illinois, every other master may lawfully do with any other one, or 1,000 slaves, in Illinois, or in any other free state. "What Robert is saying is that a master of a slave can do whatever he/she wants with that slave. By the time Roger B Taney became Chief Justice, Taney had become a staunch supporter of slavery, even though he had manumitted eleven slaves he inherited as a young man and made anti-slavery statements when serving as defense

Read More

Dred Scott Decision, Kansas-Nebraska Act, And Election Of 1860

1028 Words | 5 Pages

Dred Scott, a slave who frequently moved from the pro-slavery Missouri and antino-slavery Illinois, offered to buy his freedom after his master died. However, the master’s wife refused, which as a result, Scott sued her. Scott’s suit originated from the basis of how because that he had lived in a non-slave state, he was no longer a slave.. Through a long process of 11 years, his case eventually reached the Supreme Court in Scott vs. Sandford. The Chief Justice of this caseourt was Roger B. Taney.

Read More

Dred Scott Vs Sanford Case Study

455 Words | 2 Pages

The two parties in this case are Dred Scott and John Sanford. Scott, a former slave bought by Dr. John Emerson, argued that when him and the Emerson family moved to Illinois, which was a free state, that he became a free man and no longer could be held as a slave to the Emerson family when they moved to the slave state of Missouri. Sanford, Mrs. Emerson’s brother, argued that since he went to Missouri with Mrs. Emerson, and that it was legal in Missouri to hold slaves, that he was still considered to be Mrs. Emerson’s property. Once Dr. Emerson died, Scott and his family sued Mrs. Emerson for false imprisonment, but Mrs. Emerson won the case in a Missouri Circuit court when Scott’s lawyers were unable to prove that Emerson was holding him as a slave. Scott’s lawyers argued for a retrial and it went to the Missouri Supreme Court.

Read More

3rd 1848: The Missouri Supreme Court Case

394 Words | 2 Pages

The Missouri Supreme Court was ready to hear the case on April 3rd 1848, judge William Scott issued a unanimous decision on June 30th 1848 that “no final judgment upon which a writ of error can only lie”. The case was still just a suit for freedom. On March 17th 1848 Mrs. Emerson had the sheriff of St. Louis County take charge of the Scotts. He hired them out and maintained the wages until the trial was over; they were under his custody until March 1857.

Read More

History Of Dred Scott Vs Sanford

747 Words | 3 Pages

They moved in with Mrs. Emerson’s proslavery father. They worked for other people for a while Mrs. Emerson collected the wages. Scott then offered $300 dollars for him and his family’s freedom and when she declined he sued. This is when the Dred Scott case happened. September 17 1858 Dred Scott got tuberculosis and died.

Read More

The Case Of Dred Scott Vs. Ferguson And Brown V. Board Of Education

495 Words | 2 Pages

The Dred Scott case was about a slave who lived in free territory for a short time. When he went to the court system to tried to be freed. This case involves Dred Scott and his wife, and his master. The court ruled that Dred and his wife were to remain as a slave and that he was his masters property.

Read More

Assessing Response Of Northern Opinion To The Dred Scott Decision

1403 Words | 6 Pages

The author’s conviction that ‘northern sectionalism’ and abolitionist sentiment had been ‘rebuked’ and ‘stunned’ is at considerable odds with the substantial abolitionist media retaliation that emerged very rapidly in the North and augmented northern sectionalism. On March 19th 1857, the Chicago Daily Tribune emerged with an impassioned article, which talked of the decision being ‘the first step in a revolution that… threatened to nullify the Revolution of ’76 and make us all slaves again.’ Extract 2 itself, taken from the Northern newspaper, ‘The Albany Evening Journal’ and published just five days after the verdict, makes a similarly impassioned rant denouncing the decision in order to ‘rescue the administration… from Slavery.’ The colossal volume of Northern reactionary material that emerged immediately after the decision indicates that Extract 1‘s claim was inaccurate and calls the value of the Source into question because it demonstrably failed to show an appreciation of true northern opinion towards the Dred Scott decision. Further doubt is cast on the value of Extract 1 because of its inaccurate claim that the decision was ‘made by judges as learned, impartial and unprejudiced as perhaps the world has ever seen.’

Read More

Pros And Cons Of Samuel Scott

885 Words | 4 Pages

this was not a compassionate consideration. Owning several plantations Scott had to have a system of tracking his slave population and by listing them in family units these listings were simple and

Read More

Why Was Dred Scott Considered Free

873 Words | 4 Pages

Dred Scott reported that Mrs. Emerson beat him and treated him terribly. Hence, why he decided to fight for the freedom that he believe he deserved. Two out of the three justices were pro slavery making it a hard battle to fight for Dred

Read More

Dred Scott Argument Essay

731 Words | 3 Pages

The state attracted citizens from both the North and the South, causing the disagreements of the opposing sides to become more evident. By the year 1855, issues emerged when proslavery and antislavery settlers were competing in order to outnumber one another in votes. Two years later, divisions between the North and South grew even stronger when the Supreme Court took on the case of Dred Scott. Scott, who was an African American slave, sued for his freedom after his masters had traveled with him to a free state. The Court, ruled by Chief Justice Roger B. Taney, came to the conclusion that Scott was not a free man because he was property and it would be unconstitutional to take the property of a citizen.

Read More

The Dred Scott Decision And Bleeding Kansas

756 Words | 4 Pages

Dred Scott was born was a slave in the state of Virginia and was owned by Peter Blow, who died in 1832. Scott only had two masters after Blow’s death; one lived in Wisconsin and later Illinois, both of which prohibited slavery, yet, Scott didn’t petition for freedom. Instead he met his wife Harriet. The two met their new master in Louisiana, who did not grant them freedom, so Scott looked for legal action to escape his slavery. Over a period of seven years, he went through trial and retrial until he was denied his final freedom in 1854.

Read More

To What Extent Was The Compromise Of 1850

670 Words | 3 Pages

Dred Scott was a slave, he was owned by 2 different men that both died. When the last owner died the owner’s wife refused to allow Scott to buy his freedom. On March 1857 in the case of Scott vs. Sanford the US Supreme Court ruled the 1820 Missouri Compromise

Read More

Civil War Dbq

593 Words | 3 Pages

Where Scott, a slave black man, argued that he should be free because his owner had taken him and died in a free-state. That he should not have to go back to his owner’s wife as property, because he was in a state where he should be a free man. The decision written by Chief Justice Roger B. Taney in two parts. The first part stated that Scott was not a citizen and that he no legal ground to file a lawsuit, and the second part stated that free states laws were unconstitutional based on the 5th amendment’s right of property. This ruling elevated the tensions between the

Read More

Dred Scott Vs Sandford

1065 Words | 5 Pages

The conflict went on and created a question, which was “is Dred Scott a free man because of the Missouri Compromise?” Dred Scott

Read More

Supreme Court Case Essay

537 Words | 3 Pages

Dred Scott was sued for his freedom on the grounds that he had lived for a time in a "free" territory. The Court ruled against him, saying that under the Constitution, he was his master 's property. The people involved with this court case are the Supreme Court,Dred Scott, and Chief Justice Roger B. The final judgment for this case ended up in Dred Scott 's favor.

Read More

More about Samuel Dred Scott Timeline

Related Topics

Open Document