To What Extent Was The Compromise Of 1850

670 Words3 Pages

The 1820 Missouri Compromise drew an imaginary line dividing the country in two. In the north slavery was not allowed and in the south slavery was allowed. Congress devised a two part compromise. It granted Missouri statehood as a slave state and admitted Maine as a free state, restoring the political balance. It also drew an imaginary line west of the Mississippi and North of the 36 degrees 30 minutes latitude in which slavery would not be allowed after 1820. The Missouri Compromise settled the dispute between North and South and brought peace for nearly three decades. The Compromise of 1820 remained law until the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854. The Compromise of 1850 was one of the major events leading to the American Civil War. In 1850 the …show more content…

The Kansas-Nebraska Act drew new borders for Kansas and Nebraska and allowed its citizens to decide the inclusion or exclusion of slavery by popular sovereignty within their boundaries. As a result of sectional differences a new party was born, the Republican Party. It emerged as an opposition to the Kansas-Nebraska Act. Nebraska was a more progressive territory where differences were resolved within their more mature political institutions. The opinion of the majority of its settlers was to not extend slavery to Nebraska. In Kansas, on the other hand, the conditions were different. Radicals from both sides, antislavery and pro slavery, rushed to the territory in order to vote in the election that would decide to allow slavery or not. The confrontation started a mini civil war in Kansas known as Bleeding Kansas. Dred Scott was a slave, he was owned by 2 different men that both died. When the last owner died the owner’s wife refused to allow Scott to buy his freedom. On March 1857 in the case of Scott vs. Sanford the US Supreme Court ruled the 1820 Missouri Compromise