ipl-logo

Ideologies Of The North And South Throughout The Early 1800s

1222 Words5 Pages

Henny Omar HIST 2050 May 3, 2015 Final The two opposing ideologies of the North and South throughout the early 1800s is what eventually led to one of the most prolific times in American history, the Civil War. The different societies and cultures these people lived in led to conflict amongst the two groups of Americans, ultimately leading to a war to determine what was just in America. Each group of people had very different beliefs especially on the topic of abolition and the rights of African Americans, with the North opposing slavery and the South for it. A very common Northern theory used by antislavery campaigners in the U.S. was the theory of “Slave Power.” It was referred to as the disproportionate political power held by the slave …show more content…

The Missouri Compromise was a federal statute that prohibited slavery in the former Louisiana Territory north of the 36° Parallel, except within the boundaries of Missouri. The federal government passed this law as an attempt to preserve the balance of power in Congress between slave and free states, as many Northerners wanted to limit the expansion of slavery while Southerners thought the opposite. This again was a conflicting idea that politicians of the North and South battled over, further enhancing the rivalry amongst the two. This act was later replaced by the Kansas-Nebraska Act, which opened up the Kansas and Nebraska territory to slavery and future admission of slave states by allowing white male settlers to determine the use of slavery in territories through Popular Sovereignty. This act undermined the prohibition on slavery in territory north of the 36° Parallel that was established by the Missouri Compromise. This change was viewed by many Northern abolitionists as an aggressive, expansionist maneuver by the slave-owning South, and led to the creation of the Republic Party, further enhancing the rivalry amongst the territories. As for Popular Sovereignty, it was seen to be the cause for this territorial issue enraging many Northerners in the broken promise of Kansas being a free state as well as the voting admission of what was …show more content…

Dred Scott was a former slave who was taken to the free state of Illinois by his master, and after staying in Illinois for an extended stay; Scott made a claim for his freedom. Scott’s case ultimately ended up becoming the most infamous Supreme Court Cases of all time, and the court eventually ruled that the federal government did not have the power to prohibit slavery in their territories, deeming Scott as property, and remaining a slave. This enraged millions of abolitionists, as Scott should have earned his right to become a free man after being “Freed” by his master and had been living in the North for an extended time. This decision greatly influenced the nomination of Abraham Lincoln to the Republican Party and his election, which in turn led to the South’s secession from the

Show More
Related

To What Extent Was The Kansas-Nebraska Act Of 1854

1383 Words | 6 Pages

The Kansas-Nebraska Act was a bill that essentially disregarded and relinquished the Missouri Compromise. The Kansas-Nebraska Act stated that any westward expansion of the United States was to have the decision on slavery made via popular sovereignty. Popular sovereignty, in regards to the Kansas-Nebraska Act, was the idea that the decision on slavery in a region should be decided by the people who live there. This seemed fair, but the issue with instating popular sovereignty was that the parameters of the Missouri Compromise stated that slavery could not exist anywhere above the 36°30° line (History.com). Therefore, popular sovereignty would entirely disregard important factors of the Missouri Compromise, which was regarded by many as a strong force in holding the Union

Read More

Changes And Continuities Over Slavery Following The Mexican-American War

914 Words | 4 Pages

Changes and Continuities Over Slavery Following the Mexican-American War The Mexican-American war fought over choice pieces of territory brought greater dissension to an already divided American government. The period before the Mexican-American war was marked by sectionalism amongst the Northern and Southern states over the issue of slavery. The North was primarily for abolition while the South was pro-slavery. This division could be seen in politics as the U.S government was split between the North and South. This division would give way to conflict amongst Americans of different opinions The period before 1848, the end of the Mexican-American war, was hallmarked by conflicts over slave and free states, however the period after the Mexican-American

Read More

Osage Tribe Would Have Never Been In Favor Of The 1854 Kansas-Nebraska Act

532 Words | 3 Pages

The 1854 Kansas-Nebraska Act was an act, which allowed new territories to decide if they were a free or slave state by popular sovereignty (Civilwar.org, Kansas-Nebraska Act). Kansas-Nebraska Act negated the Missouri Compromise. Missouri Compromise was an effort by the congress to diffuse the political rivalries triggered by the request of Missouri in 1819 for admission as a state in which supported slavery (Garraty and Foner). This was done to restore the balance of slave and free states at the time. Kansas-Nebraska Act violated the compromise that was made in the Missouri Compromise, it reignited the disagreement between the anti and pro-slavery factions, which lead to violent events.

Read More

The Similarities And Differences Of Northern And Southern States In 1860-1861

773 Words | 4 Pages

The northern and southern states of America gradually grew to become very different in both ideas but also economically. One of the prevailing ideas that differed between both regions was slavery. In the north, the economy was mostly composed of the manufacturing industry while in the south the economy was mostly based on agriculture. Seeing as how the south was dependent on slaves for their workforce in agriculture it only makes sense that they would highly oppose any conflicting views and laws. Any freedom given to slaves was a threat to the souths livelihood.

Read More

Dred Scott V. Sanford Case

138 Words | 1 Pages

Dred Scott was a slave who sued his owner. He claimed he was free because his previous owner had taken him to Illinois (a free state) where he argued before the court that Congress had banned slavery by the Missouri Compromise of 1820. The state of Missouri ended up finding Scott was going to be a slave, even though the previous decisions by Missouri favored the Emancipation Proclamation because slavery has become very popular within expansion issues and compromise issues. The Dred Scott v. Sanford case is an early example of the Court’s involvement in race relations, new attitudes arise that would be changed by the Civil War, and the civil rights movement. Abolitionists were livid.

Read More

The Role Of Pro-Slavery In Kansas

249 Words | 1 Pages

“Almost 5,000 pro-slavery voters crossed the border from Missouri, voted in Kansas, and returned home” (TB) Due to the amount of people for pro-slavery, the state became in favor for slavery. In addition, slavery and antislavery groups argued in what became “Bleeding” Kansas. A committee formed to discuss the issues between the two

Read More

Missouri Compromise Essay

509 Words | 3 Pages

The Missouri Compromise was an attempt by the United States government to diffuse the issue of slavery. The issue of slavery had arisen in the recent years due to the expansion of the country. The question of slavery in every new territory rocked the nation. The Missouri Compromise was one of the government’s last attempts to fix it diplomatically.

Read More

The Dred Scott Decision And Bleeding Kansas

756 Words | 4 Pages

America’s founders created the constitution in order to create unification and order in the United States. However, there have been controversy surrounding the interpretation of the constitution, this has caused debate over many issues within the country. These issues and the lack of wartime policy within the constitution directly lead to the Civil War, which was one of the worst alterations this nation has faced. The Missouri compromise, the Dred Scott decision, and Bleeding Kansas were controversial issues surrounding the constitution that directly lead to the Civil War.

Read More

How Did Henry Clay Came Up With A Compromise

604 Words | 3 Pages

It forced them to travel all the way to Canada instead of closer free states to find freedom. Even though it was part of a compromise between the North and the South act favored the South. In 1820, the Missouri Compromise was created to help resolve the debate over the border of slave and free state. It only lasted for about thirty years before the South and North started to debate over what was a free state and slave state over the new territory on the West Coast.

Read More

Compromises Between 1820 And 1860

1121 Words | 5 Pages

There were many important Compromises between the years of 1820 and 1860, some that worked completely and some that didn’t. In the early nineteenth century, people were good at compromising and making things work for everyone. How long did perfect compromising actually last? Slavery began to split the nation apart, causing compromising to become hard to do.

Read More

Civil War Dbq

868 Words | 4 Pages

Final Exam The civil war was a devastating event in US history that was driven by the controversial issue of slavery and its expansion into western territories. A sequence of critical events highlights the growing divide over slavery that would eventually lead to the outbreak of the Civil War. The Mexican American War, the Wilmot Proviso, the compromise of 1850, the Kansas Nebraska Act, and the election of Abraham Lincoln were all key moments that soon escalated tensions over slavery. While interpretations of the lost cause argue that it was for the well-being of the South's independence as the main cause, a closer look into these events illustrates that slavery was in fact the central issue.

Read More

Social Changes In The United States From 1825 To 1850

187 Words | 1 Pages

From 1825-1850 America was a nascent nation beginning to experience an increasing demand for social progression and equal rights. Although Americans continued to discriminate against people of different races, genders and ethnicities, change came about through religious movements and improvements in the realm of children’s education. Therefore, although many people were still oppressed during this time, positive change came about by way of religious revival and reform regarding the treatment of children. In the eyes of the South, these 25 years brought on unnecessary change, most of which was spearheaded by people from the North. Growing abolitionist and gender equality movements, along with immigration posed a potential threat to the power

Read More

Mexican American War Dbq Essay

1164 Words | 5 Pages

With a desire to achieve the ideology of manifest destiny, the United States called war on Mexico to acquire their land. However, with the United States’ victory came the inevitable debate about slavery in not only the newly acquired territories, but also in the nation as a whole. The nation began to divide on the issue of slavery due to the Missouri Compromise which legalized slavery below the 36°30’ parallel and the Kansas-Nebraska Act which decided that the issue of slavery should be solved by popular sovereignty. Controversy sparked by political decisions like those aforementioned and events about slavery, disputes over slavery status in the territories, and extremist outlooks on the solution to these issues increased sectionalism and

Read More

Civil War Dbq

1820 Words | 8 Pages

The Dred Scott case would have a profound impact on the weakening bonds of the country, with present day historians identifying it as one of the major causes of the Civil War. The big issue was that of interpreting the Constitution. The Constitution was an old document, even 150 years ago, and it could be read countless ways, each with a different meaning. With no clearly defined meaning to the Constitution, both sides tried to twist the document to their side, causing conflict and increasing tension. This quality of the document aided in splitting the North and South apart, partially leading to the eventual secession of eleven southern

Read More

Missouri Compromise Essay

1563 Words | 7 Pages

The Missouri Compromise of 1820 was an attempt by Congress to ease some of the political rivalries between the North and the South (history.com 2009). The compromise stated the fact that all states up north would not have slavery and all states south would allow and continue the act of slavery (history.com 2009). It went both ways since it split the country up evenly between slave and free. The Missouri Compromise of 1820 was handwritten by Henry Clay in 1820 (ancestralfindings.com 1995). On March 6th of 1820, President James Monroe signed the Missouri Compromise and made it the new law of the land (loc.gov 2017).

Read More

More about Ideologies Of The North And South Throughout The Early 1800s

Related Topics

Open Document