The Actual Compromise
The actual compromise had multiple provisions. The Compromise of 1850 called for the admission of California as a free state; the strengthening of the Fugitive Slave Law; popular sovereignty in Utah and New Mexico concerning the question of slavery; the abolition of the slave trade in D.C.; and the federal assumption of Texas’s debt. The first one we will discuss is how Texas would have to surrender control of land in exchange for ten million dollars. The results of the Mexican war brought Texas into serious conflict with the national government. Texas had been attempting to expand its boundaries by claiming land in Santa Fe County. This now meant Texas had inclusions to the boundaries including most of New Mexico east
…show more content…
He created these resolutions and provisions in hopes that his Union would not reach the verdict of a civil war. As you can see this essay is full of information from providing the adequate general background information of one of our great Kentucky Senators, Henry Clay. Then there was the discussion of the background of the compromise. This provided you with information regarding how we came to be in need of this compromise in the first place. Next discussed was the previous failures to create this just sense of unity between the north and the south. Many tried and even Henry Clay took multiple attempts at the success he achieved. The determination and his motives shows how much he was clearly striving for his Union to reach the place of compromise. Another discussion was the creation of the comprise. This was an essential step in the process because it set the standards with the resolutions that brought together the actual compromise. The actual compromise is what we discussed next. We established the different sections of the compromise that were: admitting California as a free state, strengthening the Fugitive Slave Law, popular sovereignty in Utah and New Mexico concerning the question or slavery, the abolition of the slave trade in DC, and the federal assumption of Texas’s debate. Ultimately this compromise was a temporary solution to an even bigger problem that awaited the nation. This prolonged it for the majority of a century, however the outbreak eventually happened. Many tried and failed to face the debate of compromise in uniting the north and the south. The one behind the Great Compromise was one of Kentucky’s very own senators, Henry Clay. Clay plays a large role in the attempt to resolve this outbreak of debate over slavery and the territories where slavery is prohibited. From the span of thirty odd years, Henry Clay was able to