ipl-logo

How Did The Compromise Of The Nashville Convention-1850

941 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: A essay about harriet tubman book

Nashville Convention - 1850 (Texas) (Political)
The Nashville Convention was held by nine southern states to determine what course of action to take if the Compromise of 1850 was passed in Congress. Despite the passing of the Compromise, the south did not take action. However the session did invigorated talk of secession in the South. the Nashville Convention that invigorated talk of secession in the South.

Compromise of 1850 - 1850
The Compromise of 1850 admitted California as a free state, declared the remaining territory from the Mexican cession to be voted slave or free through popular sovereignty, abolished slave trade in the District of Columbia, and created the Fugitive Slave Act. The south felt cheated by the compromise as the …show more content…

Southerners believed the Act was justified because their belief that slaves were property was cemented through the 5th amendment. However, many citizens of the north were horrified and angered by the passing of the Act as bounty hunters were sent into free states to capture slaves, even those that had claimed their freedom. The Act was one of the most controversial components of the Compromise of 1850 and caused fear among northern citizens of the possibility of slavery spreading north.

Ostend manifesto - 1850
The Ostend Manifesto was a document created in secret by US politicians that stated the US would seize Cuba from Spain and declare the area a slave state. The south believed they had a right to Cuba in order to receive a fairer representation in government, as there were less slave states/territories then there were free. When news of this document leaked in the north, it was viewed as an attempt to increase the spread of slavery behind their back, which further strained relations between them.

Kansas Nebraska Act - …show more content…

Created in order to illustrate the cruelty of slavery, her novel was published and became one of the most successful novels of the 19th century. This popularity caused the book to become an important factor in causing the Civil War. After hearing about Beecher’s claims of southerner cruelty towards their slaves, the south labeled the north as liars and became less focused on working with northern politicians to reach compromises in the House and Senate. Harriet's novel also shocked the north, leaving an impression of the horrors of slavery, many northern citizens refused to support the fugitive slave act after reading, causing a political divide between the north and the south. With the south's stigma against the north and the north's refusal to support a federal law, tensions arose between the

Show More
Related
851 Words | 4 Pages

The Compromise of 1850 was a series of five bills that were intended to delay territorial and slavery conflicts. It passed when fillmore was in presidency and the goal was to deal with slavery and to keep the north’s and south’s interests balanced. The five bills were, California entered as a free state, New Mexico and Utah were each allowed to use popular sovereignty to decide on the issue of slavery, the Republic of Texas gave up lands that it claimed in present day New Mexico and received $10 million to pay its debt to Mexico, the slave trade was abolished in D.C. but not slavery, and the fugitive slave act made any federal official who did not arrest a runaway slave liable to pay a fine. The Fugitive Slave Act was the most Conflicting part of The Compromise of 1850 and caused many abolitionist to increase the beliefs against slavery. According to Watson “This law, which authorized Southerners to recover run-away

Read More
995 Words | 4 Pages

The Hartford Convention took a similar threatening turn when a set of constitutional amendments were added in order to limit and take away government rights from the Southern states. This also had its mark on later political decisions finally culminating in a total war. The Compromise of 1850, which meant the admission of California for the Union and a fugitive state law for the South, was also an acceptable and fair sacrifice on behalf of the Southern states. This claimed that it is the natural obligation of every

Read More
199 Words | 1 Pages

Northern and Southern opinions on slavery differed greatly and caused a major divide. While the South fully supported slavery, the Northern citizens were abolitionists set on dissolving the act. Northern Whigs were major abolitionists before and during the Civil War. The Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 forced all African-Americans in the US to become slaves if they were found by any slave owner, even if he was not their own. This law applied to the entirety of the country, thus making free African-Americans subject to slavery and inhibiting the Whigs from legally protecting any remaining Northern African-Americans (Document M).

Read More
208 Words | 1 Pages

Answer: The main issue of the Compromise of 1850 was about whether California should be a slave state or non slave state. There were several things that took place to receive the

Read More
719 Words | 3 Pages

Topic: Compromise When California applied for statehood in 1849, Southern politicians became worried that if California were admitted to the Union as a free state, it would set precedent for Congress to be able to disallow slavery in the western territories. In order to calm these concern, Senator Henry Clay formulated another compromise called the Compromise of 1850. This comprised of five separate bills, each addressing a separate condition to the compromise. The first condition was that California would be allowed entry to the union as a free state.

Read More
788 Words | 4 Pages

Thus, the Compromise of 1850 became a temporary band-aid to the issue as the North received California as a free-soil state and the South agreed because of the stricter Fugitive Slave Code (Doc A). This obtained free-soil state assisted in the sectionalism growth in the United States as the power in government tilted towards northern favor from emerging free-soil and the previous Missouri Compromise boundaries for slavery. While the southern states were in desire of obtaining new slave territory, but their inability to expand slavery into their purchased territories tipped the equilibrium between the two (Doc B). Since the constitution outlined property, the southerners felt strongly about their deemed rights over their slaves because they were viewed as property. These emotions tie similar to the Dred Scott v. Sandford case, where the Supreme Court extended the clause of slavery into any territory because slaves, like Dred Scott, were claimed as property and the government was incapable of robbing a person of their property.

Read More
175 Words | 1 Pages

The Compromise of 1850 was an attempt by the U.S Congress to settle divisive issues between the North and South, including slavery expansion, apprehension in the North of fugitive slaves, and slavery in the District of Columbia. The Compromise of 1850 failed because Senator John C. Calhoun from the South and Senator William Seward from the North could not agree on what Henry Clay was putting down. Part of the compromise was to make California a slavery free state which benefits the North, and enforcing a stricter fugitive slave law which benefits the South. Both the North and South opposed what the other was benefiting from. What sparked the failure of the Compromise was the Fugitive Slave Law of 1850.

Read More
289 Words | 2 Pages

On January 29, 1850, Henry Clay proposed five resolutions to this conflict, they were reviewed and revised and put into one, both opponents were not satisfied with the bill and the senate declined the bill. Supporters of the bill separated the five proposals into five different bills and the were passed, becoming the Five Bills of the Compromise of 1850. The Compromise of 1850 was to try to keep both northern and southern states somewhat satisfied on the issue of slavery in the new states. It made California a free state, New Mexico, and Utah had the right to choose if they wanted to be free slaves or not, the District of Columbia abolished slavery, Texas loses territory to New Mexico and the Fugitive Slave Act was passed forcing northerners

Read More
1769 Words | 8 Pages

It was called the Compromise of 1850. Later on the Fugitive Slave Act 1850 was updated and it stopped the slave trade in Washington. This led to the popular sovereignty belief, which was that the people believed that the people they voted for run the government. Kansas and Nebraska were given the choice to have slavery or not. This was known as the Kansas-Nebraska Act.

Read More
223 Words | 1 Pages

I believe that the Fugitive Slave Act was the main cause of the Civil War. This was when the south forced the north to catch any runaway slaves. Even if they just let the slave go through there property there is a high chance they could still get caught. When they get caught for not catching the slave they get fined 30,000 dollars in today's money. If they were to catch a slave and then have it run away it would be a 100,000 dollar fine.

Read More
392 Words | 2 Pages

As the United states continued to grow in size by gaining territory from others such as Mexico who through the Treaty that ended the Mexican-American war, transferred California to the US. As American continued to grow the seemingly inevitable issue of slavery festered hostility/tensions between the North and the South as they actively continue to try and keep balance of the free to slave state ratio. In the end, the underlying issue became obvious on how the United States did not practice what they preached so vocally, and I reason this by stating America failed to govern according to its own famous principles. In efforts to do so Henry Clay proposed the Compromise of 1850 which stated four main points, 1) California would be recognized as

Read More
1593 Words | 7 Pages

One of the compromises made in the Constitutional Convention is the three-fifths compromise. In this compromise, the southerners wanted to add slaves to the population of the state they lived in. If slaves were included in their state’s population, that state would be able to add more representatives in the House of Representatives. Northerners did not agree with that statement because slaves did not have the right to vote. After the delegates compromised, they agreed that only three-fifths of the slave’s population would be counted into the state’s population.

Read More
734 Words | 3 Pages

The North and South obviously had very different ideas of what was or was not constitutional. The South was so firm in their stance that slavery needed to continue to be instituted that they decided to secede from the Union. This action shows just how upset the South was because this is something that comes with great risks. They knew that the North was also firm in their belief that slavery was immoral and would do whatever it took to abolish it. However, the North also wanted the country to be a united front again.

Read More
378 Words | 2 Pages

Due to the fact that the South had more of an agricultural economy, the Southerners thought that the states should have the right to decide whether residents could own slaves, rather than the federal government. In 1846 a congressman from Pennsylvania named David Wilmot introduced a bill to the House of Representatives called the Wilmot Proviso. This said slavery would not be allowed in any western territory acquired from Mexico. Of course most of the politicians from the North loved the idea, while the politicians from the South did not. The Missouri Compromise on March 3, 1820 (also called the Compromise of 1820) was the first major legislative compromise that was passed to draw a line between slave and free territory.

Read More
921 Words | 4 Pages

Ten years prior to Lincoln’s inauguration California stand on slavery was being determined. Tennessee delegates met in Nashville to determine what would happen if California became a free state, and the topic of secession was on the table. However, after the Compromise of 1850, which implemented the Fugitive Slave Act, that required all runaway slaves be returned to their masters even if they are in a free state, like California, Tennessee and the other southern states threatening to secede from the Union were slated. Then ten years later when the democrat Abraham Lincoln was elected president it pushed many states over the edge and state began to secede. However, Tennessee’s divided regions kept it from seceding in the beginning of this civil

Read More

More about How Did The Compromise Of The Nashville Convention-1850

Related Topics

Open Document