ipl-logo

Samurai And Knights Similarities

704 Words3 Pages

The middle ages were rough times, with lots of fighting, poverty, and war, but one class of people held everyone together. Back in the 12th century two warrior forces co-existed in Europe and Asia. In western Europe, knights protected their lords, while in Japan samurai fought for honor and were loyal to their daimyos. The big question is; were the similarities between knights and samurai greater than the differences. The samurai and knights were more different than similar in three main areas: social position, training and armor, and honor and death.

Samurai and knights were overall more different in social position and status. Japan and Europe both had a feudal system and in both systems the knights/samurai served lords/daimyos. Both of …show more content…

Samurai and knights both had to go through lots of training in their first years of life, but the specific teachings and timeline of the training was very different. To start, samurai were first taught in school as a child with a combination of mental, physical, and discipline training. They studied poetry, and the honor code of Budisho, while they also learned fencing, and Buddhism. When the children were about 14 they officially became samurai in a ceremony called genpuku. On the other hand, knights also started when they were young but purely focused on the physical side of training with a little bit of religious teaching mixed in. Then at 14 the pages (young knights in training) became a squire, and then at 21 the squires became knights. (Doc. C) Overall, the samurai had a very complex training with multiple aspects mixed in, while the knights focused on physical training. This shows that the samurai were more religiously and mentally educated, and had strong beliefs, while knights were purely focused on the physical aspects of being a warrior. Knights also had a longer amount of training while Japanese children could become a samurai warrior by the time they were a teenager. This proves the difference in the training itself and the amount of time spent to become a

Show More
Related
601 Words | 3 Pages

The knight had to change their armor because of the new weapons, and for more protection the knight had changed their armor to covering their whole body so their foot, their head, and their legs. The samurai had armor that had iron scales tied together, lacquered, and then bound into armor plates with silk or leather cords.(I got my information in document D) they also had their right arm free so they can draw their bow faster. The samurai training started out with childhood school with unique combination of physical training, poetry training and spiritual training. When they were young they studied kendo the art of fencing, with bamboo sticks. The moral code of the samurai, and zen buddhism.

Read More
836 Words | 4 Pages

Chivalry was a code where knights would vow to do no wrong, be loyal to the King, to give mercy to those who ask for it, and to be courteous and helpful to women (Doc E). Knights beliefs were also very religion centered, as shown in The Son of Roland “God, I acknowledge my guilt and I beg for Thy mercy for all the sins, greater and lesser, which I have committed from the hour my birth until this day … Angels descend out of heaven and come to him” (Doc

Read More
344 Words | 2 Pages

I will be explaining the social position of Samurai, and Knights from Document A. According to Document A the SAmurai were the 4th highest on the social pyramid. They were above peasant farmers, but

Read More
851 Words | 4 Pages

In Document C1, which was adapted from Japan: Memoirs of a Secret Empire, it says that children began training to become samurai by learning swordsmanship through fencing with bamboo sticks, which is also known as the art of Kendo. Since the samurai had practiced wielding a sword and fighting with longer than the knight, if the battle had devolved into a sword fight, the samurai would be the victor. It also says that in the same document that, “In their schooling they had physical training.” On the flipside, the knights had not received as harsh training as the samurai, mainly being a squire for a knight and learning from them, and squires were much older than the samurai-in-training who were children. And while the knights did start their training at 4 and 5, the beginning of their training focused on riding a horse (which also had to wear armor because of ranged weapons, meaning that even the horse was slow).

Read More
288 Words | 2 Pages

Both Samurai and Knights were forced to be loyal to their masters. Training started at a young age, but loyalty started even younger. The top priority in Japan and Europe wasn't the ability to fight well it was more of the ability to stick out the battle with the master. Many problems would occur if either the samurai or the knight were

Read More
308 Words | 2 Pages

Both documents said that the knight would join his/her’s master into duty and a samurai would live by Bushido which notes loyalty. A difference they have between them is that the Samurai studied Kendo with bamboo sticks while the Knights didn’t. According to Document A, it said, “The young warriors studied Kendo (the art of fencing with

Read More
678 Words | 3 Pages

Samurai stood at the top of Japanese social order and made up about 7 to 10 percent of the population during the Tokugawa Shogunate. Shoguns built schools for children of samurai to prepare them for their peacetime roles as government officials, but they were required to live in the castle towns of their daimyo and they received a salary, giving the shoguns greater control of the

Read More
639 Words | 3 Pages

And knights had a code called, Chivalry. If a knight had fallen of their horse in a battle, the knight would be more vulnerable than a samurai because the knight had more armour. The social order in feudal Samurai ranked higher than the Knights. For both samurais and knights, honor was important.

Read More
283 Words | 2 Pages

In this case the Japan and Europe are being classified. The samurais and knights are more alike than different mostly because of the social positions in their communities when they are classified on the social pyramids of Japan for the Samurai and Europe for the Knight. In one of the documents I have read (Document A) it shows the Classification for Japan and Europe. The Samurai and the Knight are both classified in the middle of each pyramid underneath the Shogun and the King but above the peasants in both societies. Also in Document B with Catharina Blomberg as the source it talks about being loyal to their lords.

Read More
687 Words | 3 Pages

Tokugawa Japan + Medieval Europe Medieval Europe and Tokugawa Japan lived in seclusion to each other, and yet there were many uncanny similarities between Tokugawa Japan and Medieval Europe. In Medieval Europe there were many key features of the social system that were introduced at the time. The social system of Medieval Europe was called Feudalism. Feudalism puts the King in charge of everything and everyone, with barons and nobles underneath him. The nobles provide loyalty and knights to the king in return for land to control.

Read More
922 Words | 4 Pages

A knight at seven or eight would serve as the fathers overload or be more powerfully relative. The samurai warriors wouldn't have to accompany their master by feeding him, going on the battlefield with him, dress him, care for his horses, then they would be deemed worthy to become a

Read More
552 Words | 3 Pages

According to charts from various sources, samurai and knights are around the same rankings in a social pyramid (Doc. A). Both the samurai and knight are lower in the social pyramids at the time. They were both paid for their service with land from the lord he was working for. Another similarity is said in “The Heart of a Warrior: Origins and Religious Background of the Samurai System in Feudal Japan,” by Catharina Blomberg.

Read More
995 Words | 4 Pages

Youssef Marakby ID:900130817 Instructor: Richard Byford Rhet 1020 The Samurai’s affect on Japan’s culture For many years, the legendary Japanese samurai warriors showed that they are the most well known class of ancient Japan and also known with their supremacy of honor, service, and duty which the Japanese society still have today. The samurai helped lay the foundations of Japan 's culture.

Read More
181 Words | 1 Pages

Medieval knights were the most extraordinary men of their era. It was the process of their knighthood and all the armor that went along with it that makes the story seem like a fairytale. Back in the Middle Ages, no reputation was just handed to a man. The name and figure of being a knight went according to family, but reputation was earned. In the early ages of a future knight, the children, ages 7 to 8, are immediately taught the importance of being a perfect gentleman.

Read More
528 Words | 3 Pages

As of many warriors, They usually wear armor and train hard and strictly for war, an example of two warriors, were the Samurai and the Knights. These great warriors started out young to learn knowledge and had to start off to use rigorous, and difficult training to have a higher tolerance to pain, to be ready for any sort of combat, also to be alert of their surroundings. Armor is a no brainer for these two, they both needed armor for Protection, and use as a defense. All in all, both used armor to not die as fast. This is one of the boldest things they have in common.

Read More

More about Samurai And Knights Similarities

Related Topics

Open Document