ipl-logo

Samurais And Knights Are Apart Of The Feudal System

584 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Role of the Samurai in Japanese Society

This essay is gonna be about the similarities and differences of samurais and knights, Knights are apart of the feudal system, the feudal system is a system that is ran by a government and has a pyramid of people in the workforce, knights have the job of protecting and saving the village that they live on, samurais on the other hand come from japan, they have the same job of protecting people but instead they were hired to do the the work that they do, when samurais are in training they have to make a promise to the gods that their life is no longer theirs, is that case the gods own there life, knights are able to own there life.

Knights are apart of the feudal system so they are given land for the duty they poetry and they are given the respect that they deserve, knights own their life and they can leave whenever they want, they are given their own land and they get to protect people and get the respect they very well deserve, knights are different then samurais because they own their life, samurais have to stay with their got forever and they can never leave, knights own their life on the other hand, samurais are hired by people to protect, knights are in the feudal system to protect the people of the feudal village. …show more content…

Knights can be kicked out of their duty in the feudal system, knights can only land out of their work, samurais are able to be paid, knights work for the feudal system, samurais are able to have different experiences and they get hired to do the work that they

Show More
Related
297 Words | 2 Pages

Samurai and Knights DBQ From about 1000 - 1600 CE, samurai warriors in Japan and knights in Europe formed the military of both places. Samurai were professional warriors that protected their territory. Knights were warriors that fought on horseback,their were very powerful because of there training. The similarities between the knights and samurai can be seen in their training, armor and the codes of both europe and Japan.

Read More
601 Words | 3 Pages

The knight had to change their armor because of the new weapons, and for more protection the knight had changed their armor to covering their whole body so their foot, their head, and their legs. The samurai had armor that had iron scales tied together, lacquered, and then bound into armor plates with silk or leather cords.(I got my information in document D) they also had their right arm free so they can draw their bow faster. The samurai training started out with childhood school with unique combination of physical training, poetry training and spiritual training. When they were young they studied kendo the art of fencing, with bamboo sticks. The moral code of the samurai, and zen buddhism.

Read More
836 Words | 4 Pages

The following is a compilation of the two countries, and their versions of the feudal system. Feudal Japan and feudal Europe had contrasting social hierarchies. Feudal Europe’s hierarchy was based on religion and wealth, whereas feudal Japan’s hierarchy was based on military and necessities (Doc A). Lords in Japan were not a

Read More
344 Words | 2 Pages

I will be explaining the social position of Samurai, and Knights from Document A. According to Document A the SAmurai were the 4th highest on the social pyramid. They were above peasant farmers, but

Read More
466 Words | 2 Pages

In Document A, there are two pyramids showing the feudal system. These pyramids are very similar because it shows who is more powerful on top and who is weaker at the bottom. Another example is daimyos and lords are the same and both have people to worship them. The next proof is in Document B which shows that the samurais and knights have to give loyalty to their lords and have to fight for them. There are differences too, which are that in Document

Read More
639 Words | 3 Pages

And knights had a code called, Chivalry. If a knight had fallen of their horse in a battle, the knight would be more vulnerable than a samurai because the knight had more armour. The social order in feudal Samurai ranked higher than the Knights. For both samurais and knights, honor was important.

Read More
283 Words | 2 Pages

In this case the Japan and Europe are being classified. The samurais and knights are more alike than different mostly because of the social positions in their communities when they are classified on the social pyramids of Japan for the Samurai and Europe for the Knight. In one of the documents I have read (Document A) it shows the Classification for Japan and Europe. The Samurai and the Knight are both classified in the middle of each pyramid underneath the Shogun and the King but above the peasants in both societies. Also in Document B with Catharina Blomberg as the source it talks about being loyal to their lords.

Read More
687 Words | 3 Pages

Examples of these are that lances were longer than the Japanese Naginata, and swords were much bigger than the Japanese Katana. In Medieval Europe, lords were the military leaders, while in Tokugawa Japan, Shoguns and Daimyos lead the military system. Samurai and knights had different approaches to death, as knights were bound by Catholic law, while Samurai were not religious. Tokugawa Japan had many cultural and traditional differences from Medieval

Read More
788 Words | 4 Pages

The societies of Tokugawa Japan (c.1603-1867C.E.) and medieval Europe (c.1000-1500C.E.) had two things in common; a feudal system. A feudal system is something that features hierarchies or social structures. The feudal system normally starts with a religion, which is at the very top of the social pyramid, then it’s the King or monarch for Europe and the shogun for Japan, then there are the nobles for Europe and the daimyos for Japan. As we go down the pyramid there are the warriors, like the knight in Europe and the samurai in Japan, then there are the peasants. The peasants were included in both eras and are at the lowest part of the pyramid.

Read More
189 Words | 1 Pages

Both systems together illustrated the legal, economic, and social aspects of the Middle Ages, were known as the guidelines for the proprietors of the time, and were closely interconnected; nevertheless, they are still known as two separate systems with a few significant disparities, mainly their distinct concepts. The primary difference between the two was that Feudalism was a diplomatic and military framework, while Manorialism was a fiscal framework for the feudal estates of society, and it did not have the military component present in Feudalism. An example of this is how Feudalism included the concept of a fief, which was the agreement between the lord and the vassal to give the vassal land and his protection in exchange for his service.

Read More
763 Words | 4 Pages

Samurai and Knight society, beliefs, and training were very similar to each other during this time. In the late 400’s when there were rulers and a social class, Japan and Europe both had a relatable social pyramid. These two pyramids, have an almost spitting image of each other, excluding the names. In the Japanese society, as stated in Document A, the top of the society was the emperor, who had symbolic power.

Read More
552 Words | 3 Pages

According to charts from various sources, samurai and knights are around the same rankings in a social pyramid (Doc. A). Both the samurai and knight are lower in the social pyramids at the time. They were both paid for their service with land from the lord he was working for. Another similarity is said in “The Heart of a Warrior: Origins and Religious Background of the Samurai System in Feudal Japan,” by Catharina Blomberg.

Read More
1403 Words | 6 Pages

(History.com, “Edo”) The people of Edo followed a strict caste system, greatly impacted by the Chinese Confucian values. The Feudal Japanese Society, people of Edo, was divided into four different castes: the Nobles, the Samurai, the Peasants, and the Chonin. The nobles included: the emperor; the figurehead of society, the shogun; the most powerful military lord, and the daimyos; lords who controlled their own region of Japan. The samurai were the professional warriors who were bound by a code of loyalty and honor to a daimyo.

Read More
1064 Words | 5 Pages

In Europe it was a time of social and economic unrest, until William the Conqueror brought the feudalistic system over. Knights in the medieval ages played a critical role in the feudalistic system. Feudalism is a social hierarchy system which William the Conqueror brought to Europe. Knights support feudalism because they exchange fighting in wars with land ownership. Knights critically helped the feudal system in wars and in manors.

Read More
2306 Words | 10 Pages

Introduction Knights contributed many key attributes to making a kingdom successful. The land and it’s people were protected and guarded very well by Knights. By protecting the land and it’s citizens, knights were able to make a living from the king. This then allowed them to open manors. Knights were a very important part of the feudal system, culture, military and economy in medieval times.

Read More

More about Samurais And Knights Are Apart Of The Feudal System

Related Topics

Open Document