ipl-logo

Sedition Act Pros And Cons

972 Words4 Pages

Statement to the Court Upon Being Convicted of Violating the Sedition Act Analysis
The Sedition Act was passed in 1918 by the US to criminalize criticisms of World War I from citizens within the US. Many people were outraged by this act, believing it to be a violation of democracy's basic principles of freedom; speech and personal liberties. Many argued it was unconstitutional because it violated the First Amendment's protection for free speech. The act was enforced by the government, and thousands were arrested, even those who spoke against the war.
Eugene V. Debs was one of many to oppose the Sedition Act; an American labor leader and socialist who was found guilty of breaking it. Debs defended free speech rights as well as disapproved of …show more content…

Debs argued that the Sedition Act constituted an assault on free speech and democracy. According to Debs (pp 1-2): This "infamous law in its practical operation represents an outrageous breach of constitutional guarantees, fundamental justice principles and spirit of free institutions." Debs observed that the Act was designed to silence opposition and muffle dissent, violating one of America's core values - individual liberty. He believed that the government had no authority to make criticism of its actions a criminal offense, and considered the Sedition Act to be a breach of Constitutional principles. According to Debs: "if enforced this law would make criticizing President or Congress illegal" (Debs, p.2). Debs highlighted how the Sedition Act attempted to suppress free speech and was an assault upon democracy itself, making him believe that its enforcement violated individual liberties. Further, Debs believed the Act violated constitutional provisions as it threatened fundamental elements of democratic government. His statement serves as an excellent critic against the unfair nature of the Sedition …show more content…

Used as an effective method to suppress dissidence against government policies or war efforts, its primary goal was repression through punishment of any dissension that emerged. Eugene V Debs addressed the impact of the Act on civil liberties during his address before the court, declaring: "the Constitution of the United States remains supreme law of our land; I have lived my whole life upholding its principles (Debs, p.2)." (Debs). The Sedition Act resulted in the suppression of free speech and restricted civil liberties, leading to arrest and prosecutions of individuals speaking out against war efforts under this statute. This Act was used as justification for arrest and prosecution of those exercising their First Amendment right to free speech, such as Debs himself who received an excessive prison sentence due to speaking out against war efforts despite having done nothing but exercise them within legal boundaries. He himself received 10 years for speaking up. The Sedition Act also had a chilling effect on free speech in America. Many individuals who opposed war efforts feared being arrested or prosecuted under it; as a result, dissent was silenced while civil liberties were severely

Show More
Related
1369 Words | 6 Pages

Abrams was a case under the repressive Espionage and Sedition Acts passed during World War I, the most outrageously unconstitutional violations of our civil liberties since the 1798 Alien and Sedition Acts. The 1917-18 laws prohibited anything — including speech — that criticized the government, brought it into disrepute, and supposedly interfered with our war effort. The Supreme Court consistently upheld this legislation.

Read More
1245 Words | 5 Pages

The Sedition Act allowed the US government to give consequences to anyone who goes against the government. Congress did not want any foreigners or citizens to be able to say anything negative

Read More
771 Words | 4 Pages

This event aligns with the creation of The Espionage Act of 1917 and the Sedition Act made in 1918. The purpose of these laws was to forbid "spying and interfering with the draft but also "false statements" that might impede military success", as well as any ' 'statements intended to cast "contempt, scorn or disrepute" on the "form of government" or that advocated interference with the war effort" (Voices of Freedom 119). As a result, American citizens expressing their disapproval in any form regarding the war would be arrested and punished by these

Read More
178 Words | 1 Pages

As immigrants we had be American citizen for at least 5 years before being able to oppose a position. Under the Sedition Act, even the rights of American

Read More
484 Words | 2 Pages

The sedition act made it so that ay reporter or news source reporting on “fake” news would be imprisoned without trial. Also, the government was the ones to decide if it was fake or not. For some reason believe what John Adams did was necessary. I am not one of those people. These acts violated the constitution.

Read More
370 Words | 2 Pages

Your Honor, my client is pleading guilty to the charges of breaking the Espionage Act. Although Mr. Debs is extremely sorry for the disturbance he has caused but he was only exercising his first amendment right, peacefully. My client is aware, and has a clear understanding in what the Espionage Act is put in place for; the real problem is how could a law such as this exist? The espionage Act is in place to stop treason, and anti -americanism thoughts, but there is not enough war propaganda that exist to prohibit people from realizing war is not completely glorious. Any person that is anti- war does not make them anti-American.

Read More
1120 Words | 5 Pages

Concerns about government overreach were particularly pronounced during the New Deal, as some viewed Roosevelt's policies as excessive economic intervention and an infringement on states' rights, as many were federally regulated with no input from state government. Similarly, the wartime measures implemented during World War II prompted debates about the balance between national security and civil liberties, as evidenced by the internment of Japanese Americans and restrictions on freedom of speech. The Sedition Act of 1918 became a huge deal as it tightened the reigns on free speech regarding anything involving the war. Any public opinions that put the government in a bad light or interfered with the sale of government bonds were subject to imprisonment. The act was not in effect long, but proved how much power the government had begun to exert.

Read More
250 Words | 1 Pages

Although numerous researchers trusted this to be one of Lincoln's more regrettable choices in his administration. Abraham Lincoln's suspension of habeas corpus was utilized in a desperate time to save the union and it was protected under Article 1,section 9 of the Constitution. This paper will contend that Abraham Lincoln's suspension of habeas corpus. “After Virginia withdrew from the Union on April 17, 1861, the main lines for overland supplies, troop developments, transportation, and correspondence to Washington, D.C., went through Maryland, with the railways going through Baltimore. Baltimore was a harsh city for the Union, and Maryland a dubious ally.

Read More
318 Words | 2 Pages

The Alien and Sedition Act were enacted to make the United States more secure from foreign spies and domestic traitors (Defining America, n.d.), due to the result of the hostility between the United States and France (Outline, pg. 82). The Alien Act gave the President the authority to detain, imprison or expel aliens (immigrants) in the time of war or peace (Outline, pg. 82), which President Adams felt was needed because “foreign influence within the United States was dangerous and must be exterminated” (Alien and Sedition Act, n.d.). Moreover, the Sedition Act proscribed writing, speaking or publishing anything of false, scandalous and malicious in nature against the President or Congress (Outline, pg. 82). Although, both the Alien and Sedition

Read More
813 Words | 4 Pages

Laws passed by the government (notably the Sedition Act) made it illegal for all citizens to express or say anything that could harm or thwart America’s total war effort. Eugene Debs, a notable member of the Socialist Party was sent to prison for ten years for urging people to resist the war draft in his speeches. Espionage Act of 1917 prohibited attempts at interfering with the military in any way or supporting U.S. enemies during the war. The Sedition Act of 1918 stated that expressing a negative opinion of the government or the war was a high offense. With such acts, people were not allowed to support opposing war efforts.

Read More
726 Words | 3 Pages

Several people had the impression that the acts violated their civil liberties somehow. In particular, some felt that the Sedition Act was a direct assault on their right to freedom of the press. Because the Constitution does not provide the federal government the authority to control immigration, the restrictions on immigration included in the Naturalization Act were also considered unlawful by many people. In addition, many believed that the Alien and Sedition Acts were used as a method of discrimination because they were directed at immigrants and political

Read More
1413 Words | 6 Pages

For example, Irish immigrants in the United States resented our ally, the British. In an effort to control this type of dissent, the government implementing the Espionage and Sedition Acts of 1917. Any person who openly criticized the government would face jail time. Many objectors thought this violated their right to free speech and this ultimately landed in the Supreme Court. A man named Schenck was found to be disrupting the draft and the court ruled in favor of the government.

Read More
1870 Words | 8 Pages

In 1798, President John Adams, the second President of the United States, in response of the public reaction of the Quasi War with France, he enacted the Alien and Sedition Act, and the restriction of civil liberties during wartime has operated. Civil liberties are laws that grant individual rights such as Bill of Rights to American citizens. The scope of the restrictions is mainly about the freedom of actions and speeches. After the restriction was passed, a debate between whether or not U.S. government should restrict civil liberties of citizens during the wartime arose. Should we agree the government to restrict our civil liberties during the war?

Read More
155 Words | 1 Pages

People would consider the Alien and Sedition Acts unconstitutional because it was against of some articles from The Bill of Rights. First of all, on article 5 says that nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law, and it is against the Alien Act, that says that the president have the power to deport any alien he considered dangerous to the nation's security. Second, the Sedition Act is totally against the Bill of Rights, because it placed heavy fines and even prison terms on any person found guilty of "combining and conspiring to oppose the execution of the laws, or publishing false, scandalous, or malicious writings against the President. Finally, does the President of the United States has the power to put someone

Read More
644 Words | 3 Pages

It can be dangerous and endangers the mission of the military, but there is a difference between espionage and freedom of speech, which had to be made clear by Debs to the people of the court. Debs explained to the court that he should not be treated like a public enemy when he was just expressing his rights as an American citizen. His argument using the first amendment is still commonly heard and relevant to this day. Debs was not the only voice heard during the post-World War 1 era, he was followed by others to remind the nation of our beloved

Read More

More about Sedition Act Pros And Cons

Related Topics

Open Document