ipl-logo

See You In Court Summary

473 Words2 Pages

The book See you in Court” by Gary J. Chester dispelled the myth that all attorney’s and those in the legal system are righteous and are always working for the benefit of the client. As a matter of fact many of the stories in the book proved that our current legal system can be considered flawed with concerns around ethics and morals. Most people have the perception that lawyers are highly paid, educated, honest, and work to support the underdog. Cases where lawyers sue big corporations or defend the rights of those who have been unjustly treated have long been the standard profile of those in our legal system. Yet after reading “See you in Court” the chapter on Ambulance Chasers gives me a different perspective. In addition it makes …show more content…

Many times even though the system was followed a defendant who is guilty can go free. The criminal justice systems three components are often critized and blamed when a guilty party goes free. The first part of the system, law enforcement often provides the most confidence since it often deals with facts and data. The second component which involves attorneys, jury’s, and witnesses can be used as another example where ethics can be in question. Many times as in the case with OJ Simpson jury selection and lining up witnesses can set the trial up for a specific outcome. Once the media and general public become involved in a high profile case it can many times become impossible to have a trial that is not tampered with.
My impression of the perfect legal system has been dispelled. The true legal system as evidenced by the stories in the book leaves me with the impression that you can’t always trust the legal system to provide justice for all. Lawyers are not above the law and they are not always working to see justice served. Money and power are in many cases the motivators for not always doing the right thing. While some of the activities the lawyer participates in are not illegal it can be

Show More
Related

Michael Ira Asen Case Summary

333 Words | 2 Pages

This is the highest professional rating that Martindale-Hubbell offers to practicing US lawyers. Michael Ira Asen embarked on his career as a federal defender with United States District Court, Eastern District of New York, handling a number of cases that involved accusations of white-collar and organized crime. For the past 14 years, he has represented a large number of consumer goods merchants in the areas of civil recovery and employee restitutions after incidences of retail theft. Currently licensed to practice before six different federal courts in New York and New Jersey, Mr. Asen operates his own private practice in Greenvale, New York. In addition to maintaining this practice, he is a founder of the Sound Shore Symphony Orchestra and a lecturer for the National Business Institute.

Read More

Annotated Bibliography On Casey Anthony

427 Words | 2 Pages

They shed light on how the prosecution built their case. The authors also explains in detail on how the media and the people fixation on the case could have undermined it. Walker, C., & Filia, M. (2011). The Casey Anthony murder trial: a modern American tragedy.

Read More

Summary Of The Case Of Jimmy Dill V State

574 Words | 3 Pages

The case of Jimmy Dill versus the state of Alabama, the government’s denial of Dill’s defense led him to his tragic execution. In spite his mental disability and his experiences such as sexual abuse and lifelong struggles with drug and alcohol addiction, he did not receive the adequate legal assistance due to his financial issue, the court had not enough information, as a result, they declared him guilty. Dill did not have enough money to hire a better lawyer. Instead, he hired a lawyer that only costs a thousand dollars. It was not Dill’s currency that made him poor, according to the article, “The Crisis of Counsel in Alabama” by, Equal Justice Initiative, Alabama has a low compensation rate.

Read More

Summary Of Ethan Couch's Affluenza Defense

1013 Words | 5 Pages

This is an interesting question to pose because Zurcher can see the inequality in the justice system, especially when it came to the case of Ethan Couch. Rather than allowing this teenage boy to take responsibility for his actions, money ultimately made the decision for him. Couch did wrong by drinking and driving and did even worse when he killed four people. Time and time again, it is shown that those who have money oftentimes come out of the courtroom with better news than those who are not as financially secure. If someone has money, they will be able to pay for the best lawyers out there.

Read More

'Corruption In Bryan Stevenson's Just Mercy'

702 Words | 3 Pages

Stevenson uses individual stories and dialogue to reveal that corruption can lead to wrongful convictions and systemic inequality, as officials are vulnerable to biases and pressure that make them target innocent people and ignore proof of innocence to gain a conviction.

Read More

Summary Of The Truth About The Oj Simpson

1209 Words | 5 Pages

The Truth About the O.J. Simpson Trail dives deep into the defense of O.J. Simpson in what was known as “The Trial of the Century”. The author, F. Lee Bailey, was a criminal defense attorney who took on O.J. Simpson’s case as the Architect of Defense. In this book, he recounts the exact events that took place from the night of the murder to Simpson’s trial. By writing this book, Bailey was able to further prove that O.J. Simpson was not guilty and argue that the jury made the correct verdict. I chose this book, because while I have always been interested in this trial, I believed that he was truly guilty.

Read More

Oj Simpson Research Paper

1376 Words | 6 Pages

In the early ‘90s, it was impossible to turn on the television, the radio, or even open a newspaper without hearing about the O.J. Simpson trial. After the brutal murder of Nicole Brown (his ex wife) and Ron Goldman (her friend), all eyes turned to O.J.. He became more than just the loved athlete and actor that he had remained as for a majority of his life. Titles such as “murderer” now floated around his name. However, a vast majority of the public refused to believe he was guilty.

Read More

Review Of Indefensible By David Feige

1415 Words | 6 Pages

David Feige’s Indefensible: One Lawyer’s Journey nto the Inferno of American Justice invites people from all walks of life to a second hand experience of the criminal justice system hard at work. What is most interesting about Feige’s work is its distinct presentation of the life of a public defender in the South Bronx. Instead of simply detailing out his experiences as a public defender, Feige takes it a step further and includes the experiences of his clients. Without the personal relationships that he carefully constructs with each of his defendants, Feige would not be able to argue that the criminal justice system is flimsy at best, decisions always riding on either the judge’s personal attitudes or the clients propensity towards plea bargaining.

Read More

Examples Of Innocence In The Crucible

510 Words | 3 Pages

The legal system should be trusted to determine guilt or innocence. In my first anticipation guide I found this to be true, but after reading The Crucible I completely changed my mind. I think that the courts should be trusted to an extent. I believe this because the courts are run by humans and humans make mistakes.

Read More

Scott Peterson Trial Research Paper

1194 Words | 5 Pages

Media makes the trials notorious. We will explore the relationship between motive and viciousness, and how these factors lead to media coverage, making trials notorious. When a crime is committed, there is usually a motive behind that crime. The crime is vicious, the worst of the worst, the unimaginable. With motive and viciousness combined, it attracts the media, the public, and

Read More

Canadian Criminal Justice System: Social Media Analysis

844 Words | 4 Pages

This may cause the jury to be indecisive between what the actual case and what the media portrays it to be. The amount of media released for cases creates a negative impact within the courts and makes it difficult for a fair trial. When juries are uncertain about a case or a suspect, they result to social media platforms and news coverage that will provide them with more information and depth into the case. ‘’But if the case unfolds in the media, by the time a case gets to court, the supposedly impartial jury (or even the judge) may have already heard information and allegations (not admissible by court standards) that have caused them to seriously prejudice the parties’’. (Nedim, 2014).

Read More

Injustice In The Crucible Essay

660 Words | 3 Pages

We must go and overthrow the court, he says!’” (Miller 119). Miller gives insight into how the accusations around 1950-1954 may have also included the pressure of higher authority forcing someone (of the lower authority) with power, money, and etc. to testify false accusations. The author presents an interesting story that mirrors and represents a different time period, displaying the social injustice of people as they are motivated by fear, jealousy, hatred of one another, and more.

Read More

Examples Of Wrongful Convictions

1093 Words | 5 Pages

Inadequate defense lawyers have played a great part in wrongful convictions. According to Dr.Emily West, “[T]he most

Read More

Civil Attorney Observation

133 Words | 1 Pages

My seventh grade English teacher invited a civil attorney into our classroom in order to give a speech about careers. Her speech was well articulated, polished, and clear. She explained to the class how great it felt to be able to prosecute criminals and bring justice to the local court systems. Later on within my junior year, I had met a teacher’s daughter who also happened to be a civil attorney. She told me that albeit she made less money than the rest of the attorneys, she still enjoyed her job because it brings justice, especially with all of the social injustices occurring within the United States such like police brutality.

Read More

Conflict Theory Of Crime

1065 Words | 5 Pages

For example, the upper class citizens have more money which could result in a better lawyer. Although they are not the same crime, embezzlement, performed as a white collar crime, and robbery, a street crime, can be compared on a judicial level. Presuming these crimes could receive about the same sentence, because they are both stealing, often times stealing of money or things of value. Brooks Holland, who attained a Juris Doctor degree at Boston University School of Law, stated when one goes to court, the U.S. Constitution guarantees the right of an attorney and a fair trial (381). However, lawyers can be very expensive.

Read More

More about See You In Court Summary

Related Topics

Open Document