During the 1960's, Martin Luther King Jr. began his non-violent campaign in Birmingham the city he claimed to be the most throughly segregated city in the United States. He was in jail in Birmingham for leading protests. Fellow clergymen criticized his actions as violence that needed to be settled realistically. King began to act against segregation after trying to negotiate because that was his only option. Negroes weren't treated fairly despite the true freedom America has granted. Throughout the southern United States Negroes have experienced prejudice, so Martin Luther King Jr. And his followers nonviolently protested against segregation for the sake of freedom.
Martin Luther King Jr. and fellow clergymen had different attitudes towards King's activities in Birmingham. The clergyman claimed to agree with certain Negro leadership yet they weren't supporting Negroes themselves. The clergymen expressed the demonstrations of Negro citizens as unwise and untimely. King stated that, the demonstrations were well-timed because they had suffered from the disease of segregation. The community had constantly refused to negotiate,
…show more content…
Imagine segregated cities like Birmingham there were many places like restaurants, laundry mats, and even hotels that didn't accepted colored people. Some signs pointed out which side was for whites, and the other for colored. There were also signs posted saying whites only. To King, racial segregation is unjust because it distracts the personality of a negro. The protesters were being civilly disobedient towards racial segregation with the willingness to accept the consequences for the sake of freedom. King was once charged for protesting without a permit. He understood that the ordinance required a permit to parade. He viewed such an ordinance as unjust because it denied citizens their right to peaceful assembly and