ipl-logo

Sellarsian Argument Vs Foundationalism

2247 Words9 Pages

Jess Johnson In my paper there will be a lot of content that all pieces together. The infinte regress problem is an issue, and describing the foundationalists solution to the problem will also fall in with this, along with the Sellarsian Argument and how it challenges foundationalism and supports coheritism, and the responses of the Phenomenal Conservatist to the Sellarsian Argument and my evaluation to the response. We have a lot to cover in a short amount of time so packing it all in with efficiency is going to be key throughout my paper. I give my own ideas to show how I articulate on the subject and also how I come to better understand each individual topic at hand. With furhter ado, may I present my first topic at hand, the infinite …show more content…

Infact, the foundationalist argument goes as follows, There are justified basic beliefs, all non-basic justified beliefs are justified by some relation to basic justified beliefs. (Class Notes) The former two premises of the foundationalist argument both deal with basic beliefs, of which the Sellarsian Argument shows a challenges to the foundationalist argument. While the Foundationalist argument is trying to prove that there are basic beliefs, the Sellarsian Argument is completely doing away with them in the above paragraph. Bringing in the idea of assertive propositional content makes a huge impact on the Serllersian Arguments idea of there being no basic beliefs because whether or not a belief is an assertive propositional content makes no difference because it still needs some sort of justification, whether further or from the given states. The Sellarsian argument comes off as strong but seems like it would lead into the regress problem, which I have a problem with. If there are no basic beliefs then it leads to the idea that everything needs justification, meaning that those justifications needs further justifications unless they don't have assertive propositional content. These cases such as desires are said to be justified by given states, hence justified, but there has to be justification to those given states because they are not basic beliefs, which does infact lead to the regress problem. So although the Sellarsian Argument tries to do away with the foundationlists basic beliefs, it seems to fall short in my

Show More
Related

Chapter Summary: Mathematics Through The Eyes Of Faith

1351 Words | 6 Pages

Salem Alsari Mat 301 Dec,2017 Mathematics Through The Eyes of Faith The main aim of James Bradley and Russell Howell’s book is basically to address the unfamiliar relationship between mathematics as a major in the field of science and Christian/religious beliefs. Mathematics Through The Eyes of Faith consists of eleven chapters with each one representing an important common subject of the connection between math and faith. For example: infinity, dimensionality, chance. Moreover, each chapter ends with a list of substitute exercises for the student. Some of them are good old fashioned, logical mathematical exercises that would interest even the most advanced students of mathematics.

Read More

Lara Buchak's Can It Be Rational To Have Faith

1347 Words | 6 Pages

In Lara Buchak’s essay, Can It Be Rational to Have Faith? , she asserts that everyday faith statements and religious faith statements share the same attributes. She later states that in order to truly have faith, a person ceases to search for more evidence for their claim, and that having faith can be rational. Although she makes compelling arguments in favor of faith in God, this essay is more hearsay and assumption than actual fact. In this paper, you will see that looking for further evidence would constitute not having faith, but that having faith, at least in the religious sense, is irrational.

Read More

The Cosmic Perspective By Neal Degrasse Tyson Analysis

946 Words | 4 Pages

“The Cosmic Perspective” is successful

Read More

Summary Of How Democratic Is The American Constitution By Robert Dahl

1376 Words | 6 Pages

If this proves correct I will then go into if his definition is relevant and needed today in America. In order to do this I will be providing counter arguments to his arguments throughout the book. To start off, the problem Robert

Read More

Martin Luther King Social Contract Essay

1112 Words | 5 Pages

The critical examination of his life and philosophy also includes an understanding of the complexities and nuances of his strategies and their reception within

Read More

What Is The Core Jigsaw Pieces That Make Up Your Worldview Essay

460 Words | 2 Pages

These concepts are able to complement and inform one another because of the connections between all beliefs. The presuppositional apologetic perspective can be related to my core belief of the Bible. The foundation for rationality and knowledge is built through this apologetic belief through the Bible, which is something I believe

Read More

Summary Of A Priori Warrant

1880 Words | 8 Pages

In his attempt to construct a more comprehensive, milder version of the two, Goldman’s own formulation of moderate naturalism is, as he states, a “fusion” of the two previous versions of naturalism. This reformulation consists of two components: (A) “All epistemic warrant of justification is a function of the psychological (perhaps computational) processes that produce of preserve belief”, and (B) “The epistemological enterprise needs appropriate help from science, especially the science of the mind” (Goldman

Read More

American Revolution Dbq Essay

999 Words | 4 Pages

The two arguments have many similarities, especially in the foundation

Read More

The Ethics Of Belief William Clifford Analysis

1680 Words | 7 Pages

Clifford argues that all beliefs must be justified. In his writing, The Ethics of Belief, Clifford states that “it is wrong always, everywhere, and for anyone, to believe in anything upon insufficient evidence” (Clifford 5). Clifford means that it is morally wrong to believe something without sufficient evidence. This can be a problem when one examines the very definition of belief. A belief is a thought, which may have a foundation in reality, but does not require it.

Read More

Edmund Gettier's Article: Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?

1261 Words | 6 Pages

In the 1963 philosophy paper titled “Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?”, Edmund Gettier attempts to deconstruct and disprove the philosophical argument that justified true belief is knowledge. Justified true belief, also commonly referred to as JTB, is used as a certain set of conditions that are used to explain someone s knowing some sort of proposition p. More specifically, JTB is used to say that s has knowledge of p if and only if p is true, s believes that p is true, and s is justified in believing that p is true. Gettier offers main points as the conclusion of his argument against this claim. First, he states that s can be justified in believing that p is true while p is actually false.

Read More

PHIL150 Introduction To Metaphysics Summary

596 Words | 3 Pages

Ch. 5: Discussion: Video Summary: PHIL150 Introduction to Metaphysics: Being around since the earliest philosophers, metaphysics overall poses the question about the nature of reality (UNE Armidale, 2009). Today, metaphysics can still be found in every culture, all over the world, and even when observing everyday quotidians such as movies; nevertheless, metaphysics isn’t just for entertainment (UNE Armidale, 2009). Metaphysics examines the concept of a systematic approach when tackling the big questions of life and thus gives us a procedure that can lead to optimal clear thinking (UNE Armidale, 2009). Rene Descartes, considered to be the father of modern philosophy, was known to come up with these procedures that are still used today- such as questions like “what is it possible not to doubt?” , “what is indubitable?”

Read More

How To Be An Atheist: Chapter Analysis

507 Words | 3 Pages

While reading this book, I come away with three major thoughts. First, Stokes provides a clear understanding of naturalism. Being able to understand naturalism, removes all confusion that may occur if I were to talk to a person about my beliefs. During this semester the topics of naturalism, skepticism, and multiverse theory, were often very difficult to follow. However, it is clear in How to Be an Atheist, and lends itself to apologetics, giving clear reason of argument.

Read More

Book Of God Sparknotes

541 Words | 3 Pages

Brooke Santy Dr. Schulteis History of Infinity 24 October 2017 Jorge Luis Borges on Infinity Jorge Luis Borges was born on August 24, 1899 and died on June 14, 1986. He was an Argentinian poet, short-story writer, and essayist whose works became classics of 20th century literature. Borges concerns himself with several mathematical concepts by writing multiple short stories involving infinite processes. One of Borges’ strongest links to mathematics is through Georg Cantor’s theory of infinite sets.

Read More

Ancient Greeks 'Attempts To Understand The Concept Of Infinity'

1318 Words | 6 Pages

The Start of Infinity This article briefly discusses the journey of the attempts to understand the concept of infinity. Ancient civilizations did not display having knowledge of conceptualizing infinity, but of course from the time people began to think about the world they lived in, questions about infinity arose. Ancient cultures did not define infinity as does modern mathematics but instead approached infinity as a philosophical concept. During the development of mathematics and science, the early Greeks came across the problem of infinity.

Read More

The Protestant Ethic And The Spirit Of Capitalism

831 Words | 4 Pages

“The Calvinist were fascinated by the idea that God in creating the world, including the order of society, must have willed things to be objectively purposefully [..] The active energies of the elect, liberated by the doctrine of predestination, thus flowed into the struggle to rationalize the world” (Weber 224). Features of rationalisation include increasing one's knowledge, growing impersonality and the enhancement of control over social and material life. In relation to rationalisation, the process of disenchantment has also led to the three phenomena that now plague

Read More

More about Sellarsian Argument Vs Foundationalism

Related Topics

Open Document