The American Revolution was the birth of one of the most modern and powerful nations in the world, and by no means was an insignificant event. It was the initial severing of the colonies that the British empire had established from their own country. Many Americans firmly believe that the Revolution was an event sparking the liberty and freedom that this country has enjoyed, but many have never stopped to consider: was the excision of America from England a biblical occurrence? This has been a highly debated question in some circles, and the conclusion is not clear. Two such constructed arguments, both for the biblical soundness of the event and against, tackle the issue. The two arguments have many similarities, especially in the foundation …show more content…
They then address the issue of whether the war was in self defense by pointing out the fact that the only reason the English infantry attacked was because they were putting down a rebellion of people that had broken the law. Thus, the American people had deserved the authorities that the British nation had sent, and therefore had no right to begin war. In contrast, the idea that considers the revolution biblical states that the American people, while deserving the policing, had not started the war, and the British militia had sparked the battles that led into the war. However, both sides agree that England’s government had not been forcing religion or causing the colonists to sin. One particularly interesting point raised was that while government as a system is to be respected, the people that corrupt it and use it to the advantage of others should be distanced. Or in the case of the colonists, removed from …show more content…
The first was that while the government was to be respected and honored as a God-established entity, blind acceptance and obedience to every order was not. This was the primary view that the founding fathers operated from, though many also came from the second idea. The second was that while God did not allow for offensive war, He did allow for self-defense. And many did believe that the revolution was founded in a fundamental right to fight to defend their families, which we are all called to do. Between these two views, the momentum required for the revolution gathered speed and eventually erupted. However, in hindsight, it’s very hard to quantify the revolution as self-defense, as the British militia was simply responding to unruly rebels and creating a forceful presence to cause the colonists to settle down. We as a nation now would certainly encourage police to settle an angry