In this chapter, Freeman shifts the focus from the physiology of sex education and instead highlights how sex education curricula of the 1940s/1950s began to include the mental and psychological aspects of sexual development. Because of this, sex education introduced courses designed to discuss boy-girl relationships and the, often contradictory, messages perpetuated to young girls. During the mid-twentieth century, both feminists and sex educators agreed that girls are not inherently feminine, but rather it is a gender performance, which is earned. Because of this, sex education often depicted culturally specific and acceptable forms of femininity. This is a key concept that is applied to The Story of Menstruation and the fairytale-esque
Other readings have discussed the history of sexuality—A history of Latina/o Sexualities. Throughout history, women were supposed to be passive. Women were there to please the man and ofter were viewed as the inferior. Sex was viewed as something that was essential only for reproduction; it was only to be pleasurable during a marriage and through very strict guidelines set by the church. This is still an influential way which women are being treated today.
This author brings into light the observation of nonheteronormative sexual behaviors amongst different kinds of animals. Johnson explains how before this published work, it was assumed that every animal only expressed heterosexual behavior because it was much easier to do. He expresses his own personal experience of this idea as well, “it was easy to assume I was straight too; I did so for the first eighteen years of my life” (582). Johnson includes himself in his essay to break this idea of what is natural and what is unnatural, because so far as one can see everything is changing and new things are always being discovered.
Same sex sexuality Sex between individuals of the same gender started a long time ago. Leila J. Rupp in her book A Desired Past gives an insight into the history of same sex sexuality in the United States. The culture of sex between persons of the same agenda presently is evident in many parts of the world.
In the Victorian era, homosexual relationships were generally accepted as long as it did not interfere with the traditional marriage. In the 1960s, homosexuality was seen as a political choice in the 1960s, while also being criticized by the mainstream and radical feminists. In the 1990s, it was portrayed as a threat by the Republicans and defended by the Democrats, only to be slightly pushed back by Clinton’s decision to sign DOMA (Friend, 470). According to this perception, the perception of Homosexuality has become gradually more grim following the 1800s, and its progress forward from the 1960s and 1970s to earn civil rights has been difficult (Stansell 84, 91-92).
In the 1600’s, there were strict guidelines to how a person should behave. In this time period, it was the man’s job to provide for his family; which is not quite different from today’s views of what a man should do. Men were thought of as powerful masculine beings, who defended honor. When it came to marriage, men owned everything their wife had and after the marriage.
With society changing, new laws are becoming legal and same sex marriages are getting more common, it seems that the society is trying to explore because they are lost. They seem to be cold and are trying to see what is right for them and when people are exploring they are somewhat having loveless
In the 1920s, homosexuals were widely accepted. The author of a popular play about homosexuality, Mae West, was an early advocate of gay rights. In the 1930s, the public didn’t want to deal with homosexuality in the actors, so they forced them to retire or keep their sexuality private. Homosexuals would not be accepted again until the 1960s. In the 1930s, life was harsh for homosexuals.
Inside and beyond the myth and the social impact of the subject as One or Substance. Alan H. Goldman’s essay ‘Plain Sex’ is a central contribution to the academic debate about sex within the analytic area, which has been developing since the second half of the ‘90s in Western countries. Goldman’s purpose is encouraging debate on the concept of sex without moral, social and cultural implications or superstitious superstructures. He attempts to define “sexual desire” and “sexual activity” in its simplest terms, by discovering the common factor of all sexual events, i.e. “the desire for physical contact with another person’s body and for the pleasure which such contact produces; sexual activity is activity which tends to fulfill such desire of the agent” (Goldman, A., 1977, p 40).
Anything in relation to sexuality will always be controversial. There will always be different opinions, outcomes and even consequences towards sex related topics. I want to first investigate the key concepts and beneficial outcomes of the website by analyzing a three-way article review by Zoe Grimm, Kit Bangles and Karly Kingsley. These three women of the Vodka Press are known for their personal-oriented blogs and podcast who decided to personally experiment and critique MakeLoveNotPorn. “I applaud MLNP’s ideology, to be “of the people, by the people, and for the people who believe that the sex we have in our everyday life is the hottest sex there is.”
Scholars have analyzed the study of sexuality for more than two decades; however, it was limited to Europeanist and colonial American scholars. The research created by Mary Perry, and Sherry Velasco, who focuses on sexuality in Portugal and Spain, became foundational work for colonial Latin American historians. This connection is due to the innate ties Spain and Portugal had to Colonial Latin American society. Perry’s 1990 work Gender and disorder in early modern Seville, discusses how seventy-one men were burned to death for pecado nefando, defined as anal intercourse or bestiality.
For Goodness Sex, by Al Vernacchio, is a welcome relief from the two previous books; Girls & Sex and Man Interrupted, as the focus is about sexuality as a whole; gender, sexual orientation, etc., rather than on the culture of females and males. In a chapter titled “Gender Myths,” Vernacchio (2014) asks the question, “male and female, is that all there is” (Vernacchio, A., p. 112, 2014)? In teaching his class on Sexuality and Society, Vernacchio asks these questions and questions similar, demonstrating that he takes into consideration that there are feelings at stake and keeps in mind the human aspect of sex and sexuality as he is intentionally behind challenging students to foresee and develop their sense of values about sex, instead of constantly being “in the moment.”
Any analysis or understanding of any aspect of Western culture is incomplete and degraded if it does not incorporate a critical analysis of modern homo/heterosexual definition (Sedgwick 2008,
Sociological Perspectives Sexuality has three assumptions to it 1. Sexuality of members 2. Institutions of society such as family, religion, 3. What is appropriateness or inappropriateness of sexual behavior with in the cultural it occurs in.
It suggests that all men will generally enjoy the same thing while all women will not wish to consume porn. This informs the misleading ideologies that are often present in culture about sexuality. In studying the misleading conceptions of sex, often supported and established by the porn industry, a dimension of sexuality can be examined in defining culture. When we dig into what we consider erotic or sexual and our emotion’s impact on that, we are inevitably analyzing culture and what it
