Shakespeare Research Paper

Shakespeare research paper

Did Shakespeare write his own plays? This question has been debated many times, and the answer is indeed yes, he did. The evidence that has been found shows just that. Various research articles have given strong reasons as to why Shakespeare did or did not write his plays. However, the majority of the research has been pro toward Shakespeare writing his own plays. A few helpful articles on the idea of Shakespeare writing his own plays or not are written by Alexa Stevenson, Alex Knapp, Sarah Neville, and Steven Dutch. Three main topics on the reality that Shakespeare wrote his plays are Shakespeare was a well-known writer, his name is on the plays and poems that he wrote, and several of Shakespeare’s plays were collaborated.Shakespeare,

So Shakespeare's writing as good and famous as it is now and back then is no surprise. Alex Knapp states, “Shakespeare first gained notice of the writing world in 1592, in a pamphlet by Robert Greene that refers to him as "an upstart crow" - the work of a veteran writer wary of new blood.” This excerpt is an example of how Shakespeare is known and is not just some random poet with little experience or knowledge for poetry and writing. For example, if Shakespeare was not known during his time, then it may have been a surprise to the people when his writings came out. Also stated, “In 1594 and 1595, there are records of favorable reviews to Shakespeare’s Lucrece, and as noted above, by 1598 he was already famous enough to be worth the time of publishers to attach his names to works they wanted to sell.” This point that is made, recognizes how well known Shakespeare was-- even early on in his

To be exact, seventeen of the forty-four plays in the New Oxford Shakespeare are identified as collaborative—an astonishing percentage.Specifically stated in the third article by Neville. Many people think that since Shakespeare collaborated that is considered a reason why William did not create his own work. On the contrast, there are many examples showing that collaborations during Shakespeare’s time were not rare. The evidence given by Neville is, “As scholars came around to the idea that Nashe had a hand in the play, the popularity of substituting “The whiles” gradually faded from editions, and Shakespeare’s domination over his relatively unknown contemporaries was lessened, bit by bit. By making the kinds of changes that recognize the multiplicity behind original texts, editions like the New Oxford Shakespeare put Shakespeare back into the context 12 of his age, a time when collaboration between playwrights could account for up to sixty percent of one company’s annual productions.Statistics like the one above are highly specific, and are possible only because we have a theater producer’s business diary that lists group payments to authors, one of the few kinds of ‘smoking-gun’ evidence for collaboration that even scorners find hard to ignore.” However, In the article, Neville also describes, “For example, Two Noble Kinsmen was a