ipl-logo

Shared Question

1168 Words5 Pages

Shared Question (or investigation) Discussions The leader of a shared question (or investigation) discussion not only prepares the (related to thinking a lot about what things mean to you) questions that start discussion, but also controls its flow. Leaders challenge people (who were part of a study, etc.)' unclear, truly incorrect, or statements that can't all be true; follow up on people (who were part of a study, etc.)' answers; ask for evidence and invite further responses. If people (who were part of a study, etc.) change the topic from the main point, it is the leader's responsibility to redirect attention with a question. Leaders must recognize when a question has been settled and then, by presenting/causing a new (related to thinking …show more content…

In shared question (or investigation), it is assumed that people (who were part of a study, etc.) will come to the discussion with a basic knowledge of the clear elements in a text, such as the names and relations of (based on a made-up idea) characters, the time-based order of a story, and any (made to do one thing very well) terms that an author uses. Such true information can be helpful in making well-formed responses to (related to thinking a lot about what things mean to you) …show more content…

Strong evaluative questions are based on a sound (understandings/ explanations) of what an author is saying, firmly grounded in the text, and because of the direction a discussion is taking. In shared question (or investigation) discussion, there is often no clear-cut difference between (related to thinking a lot about what things mean to you) and evaluative questions, and the two often merge into each other. It is sometimes valuable to set aside the later part of/amount of a shared question (or investigation) discussions that clearly face/deal with wider, evaluative issues that may range far beyond the text. In a shared question (or investigation) discussion, leaders should not present/cause questions that are really statements in disguise, nor should they ever attempt to guide the group on a fixed route through the selection. Also, leaders should stop easily offering their own opinions or making definite statements. If leaders do these things, or if they offer answers to their own questions, people (who were part of a study, etc.) might begin to play a more (allowing something to happen without reacting or trying to stop it) role, while the leader might be tempted to turn the discussion into a lecture; such

Show More
Related
585 Words | 3 Pages

An important part of leadership is the ability to make every moment and conversation matter. Try to

Read More
1024 Words | 5 Pages

In every one of the leaders today and along time prior lead for various reasons, how might we lead in various

Read More
567 Words | 3 Pages

Rather than adhering to the well established inquiries, take a stab at playing on words and make your question fascinating. It would make you emerge from the group. It would make you emerge from the group. by means of Individuals will really appreciate chatting with you. Continuously outline and ask an all around planned question in discussion.

Read More
481 Words | 2 Pages

The Tulsa Massacre of 1921 was a tragic event in American history in which a white mob attacked and destroyed the thriving Greenwood District, also known as “Black Wall Street”, in Tulsa, Oklahoma. The event resulted in the deaths of hundreds of African American residents and the displacement of thousands more. This massacre was a direct result of tensions breaking after the Great Migration, a movement of approximately six million African Americans from the southern to Midwest and Northeastern states. Effects of the Great Migration led to an enormous cultural and social change in the midwest and northeastern states, as the African American population increased by over 40% the culture in states like Oklahoma changed drastically. However, this increase in the population caused competition in the job market to increase, and as tensions rose, anger from the racist white community was directed toward people of color.

Read More
482 Words | 2 Pages

What grounds for debate or controversy can you identify within the

Read More
568 Words | 3 Pages

A shared inquiry discussion leader not only prepares questions that form discussion, but also keeps the discussion flowing. Discussion leaders should challenge the unclear, inaccurate, or contradicting statements of the participants; follow up on answers given to questions; ask for evidence proving an answer; and help form further responses from the participants. If participants start to stray from the discussion’s main point, it’s the discussion leader’s responsibility to help redirect attention by asking a question. Discussion leaders should know when a question has been answered and then, by presenting a new question, direct the group’s efforts toward another problem. Interpretation is one of the main purposes of a shared inquiry discussion, because interpretations can

Read More
221 Words | 1 Pages

The Sermon on the Mount found in Matthew 5-7, is framework in which Christians are to align their lives with, and where our definition of justice should come from; through Christ’s teachings I am able to see that for my topic of the truths and consequences behind why there is a lack of recognition/awards given to minority actors and how the issues within that are a reflection of America’s issues. The Sermon focuses on not only the relations that we are to hold with others, but also our relationship with ourselves; beyond the types of relations we seek and hold within ourselves the sermon also speaks on how we are to assess what to do when injustice is done. Jesus’ Sermon on the Mount, calls for those who vow to live by the Christian way of

Read More
524 Words | 3 Pages

Shared Inquiry Discussions When two peoples or a group of peoples have a shared inquiry discussion, a “leader” prepares a main topic question or an interpretive question that initiate the discussion. This same “leader” is going to follow the discussion, invite further responses, follow up on participants’ answers, ask for evidence. And if one of them digress from the main point it is the leader’s duty to redirect him on the right subject maybe with another question. If the question or problem which is the main point of the discussion has been resolved, the leader is going to pose a new question or direct the group’s efforts toward yet another problem of meaning.

Read More
1924 Words | 8 Pages

In spite of the fact that’ leadership analysis’ is the art of breaking down a leader into basic psychological components for study and use by academics and practitioners, a sound leadership analyses

Read More
1509 Words | 7 Pages

Evidence Open Ended Questions Some of the many benefits of an open ended question are that it allows an infinite number of possible answers, collects more detail, it allows the person to learn something they didn 't expect to know, get adequate answers to complex issues, it encourages creative answers and self expression, and gives the person an understanding of how the respondents thinks. According to the transcript provided in this case study, there are relatively few occurrences in which open ended questions were used for eliciting useful information. This is expected to a limited extent of the work culture that the call center manager, Thomas has imposed in his location. The first situation where evidence of an open ended question was demonstrated

Read More
880 Words | 4 Pages

However, this type of conversation requires the administrator to be very in tune with themselves and their responses. It encourages us to look at the situation from the other person’s perspective. Then, it wants us to “be open to learning, to really hearing the other person” (Styer). This is supposed to be enough to make us feel prepared to have a “Fierce Conversation.” We should constantly try to look at things from the other’s point of view.

Read More
844 Words | 4 Pages

2. Share perspectives a. Ask for the other person’s perspective b. Paraphrase what you hear c. Acknowledge your contribution d. Describe your

Read More
708 Words | 3 Pages

So, we created a group chat, in which we could share our ideas, findings and concerns

Read More
809 Words | 4 Pages

Leadership is a procedure which a man affect others to achieve a goal or objective and directs the organisation in a way that makes it more consistent and intelligible (Farrukh Ahmed, 2008). It can also defined as the process that occur by persuading others to obtain goals in a team. The leaders carry out this process by applying their own leadership knowledge and skills. While the skills and knowledge of leadership proceed by the leader can be influenced by his or her attitude, such as ethics, beliefs, behaviours and character (Barmayehvar and Parvar, n.d.). Leadership concerned with initiating changes which also provide direction and motivation to others and keeping the task on pathway (Hernon, 2009).

Read More
832 Words | 4 Pages

Language processing Language processing is the ways humans use words to express their ideas and feelings. And also how such communications are processed and understood. Thus it is how the brain produces and comprehends language. In detail it is the factors influences the process of language. According to the recent theories this process is carried out entirely by and inside the brain.

Read More

More about Shared Question

Related Topics

Open Document