Augustus wrote the Deeds of The Devine Augustus, it was a first person account of his rule over Rome. It was written before his death in 14 A.D. Augustus wrote this document as part autobiography and part last will and testament. The main story line of The Deed of The Devine Augustus describes Augustus’ political career, his military success, and ultimately serves as propaganda to inspire the Romans to continue in the path of his empire.
The Kelsey Museum Augustus, First Emperor of Rome, is similar and different to many Roman art pieces. The first very obvious style that can be seen is the Augustan period approach, the Augustus of Primaporta statue from Italy, marble copy, from early first century is a great example of this approach. They both have the same exact straight hair strand placement, face shape, and youthful idealized face. Augustus uses the same style throughout all his statues and reliefs, where his forehead is very wide and longer than his chin area. Unlike the prior Republican period style, the Augustan period rejects the veristic style, which is the very extreme expression of oldness.
In the article Half-Measures Won’t Erase the Painful Past of Our Monuments, by Holland Cotter, cotter describes the connotations of historical monuments from the past and how it impacts the present by using rhetorical choices such as ethos, pathos, and a neutral tone, to relate to those who have been impacted by the history and to spread more awareness about their history. The government’s actions on whether the monuments convey a positive or negative messages, is not satisfying, which is related to the title “Half-Measures Won’t Erase the Painful Past of our Monuments”. Through the use of pathos, Cotter relates to readers who have been impacted by the people who are being celebrated by monuments, by referring to the messages monuments
"The Deeds of the Divine Augustus" was written in AD 14 by the ancient Roman Emperor Augustus. It was an autobiographical piece of literary work that lists the various deeds that Augustus performed throughout his reign as Emperor, but it was merely written so that the people of Rome would remember Augustus as a great leader who went out of his way in order to create a better society for Rome. Within the text Augustus utilizes the first person singular in which "I" mostly occurs at the beginning of every paragraph. He is making a clear analysis of his own accomplishments ranging from, raising an army, waged war, spared citizens, and first rejected an oppurtunity at dictatorship (paragraphs 1,3,5). Although it may seem that Augustus
Political figures in art has always been an important part of our history, culture and artistic representation, Roman and Byzantine art is a classic case of these representations. The Equestrian Statue of Marcus Aurelius and Justinian as World Conqueror are two examples that demonstrate the power and prestige of these political authorities. First, Equestrian Statue of Marcus Aurelius from the Roman, Italy (173-176 CE) measures 11’6” high, cast in bronze. Secondly, Justinian as World conqueror from Byzantium period measures 13” x 11” entire panel, center panel 7” x 5” and 1” deep. The creator of the equestrian statue is unknown, however, the creator of Justinian’s ivory relief was probably made by the imperial work of Constantinople.
The 8th grade class took a 4 day trip to Washington. We did many things to explore Washington D.C. including visiting monuments. Some people think differently of how a monument should be made. Good monuments to some people could be to make people remember about the person or thing being remembered or to just reflect the person’s life or importance. In “The Follower Problem” by David Brooks, David thinks a good monument should show power and authority.
Kirk Savage suggests in Source A (Savage), “The public monument speaks to a deep need for attachment that can be met only in a real place, where
This corresponding perception can be acknowledged as according to Suetonius, Augustus “…could neither satisfy the veterans nor the landowners, since… they were not being treated as their services had led them to hope.” This same issue was also further addressed and revealed throughout Tacitus’s works as he exclaimed that in order to keep the veterans and landowners quiet, to consequently maintain his impeccable appearance, “Augustus won over the soldiers with gifts, the populace with cheap corn.” On the other hand, although Tacitus and Suetonius’s viewpoint could be perceived as bribery or enticement another individual, such as that in favour of Augustus, could of seen it as generous and substantial, in hand showing a pure demonstration of how alternate perspectives may be predisposed by the early judgment of an individual such as
This showed the Roman people that Augustus was not about to enter them into a war for his own personal gains. It also allowed him to be seen as a peacemaker instead of a warmonger and that was vitally important to the Romans since they had suffered through civil war for the last seventy years. The people would remember Augustus as a man who protected their interests and looked out for them instead of just using them as fodder to attain more glory. This was precisely what Augustus wanted because the more people praised him for not chasing glory he actually gained more personal glory. Augustus found a way to mask his glory seeking behind other ideals and motivations and this is something that can be seen again several centuries later during the
The first stage in the formation of exempla according to Roller is the performance of an action in the presence of others, yet Augustus’ good deeds in the Res Gestae blatantly fall outside of this criterion. Rather than allow the public to directly view his actions, Augustus decided for himself which sections of his history he would reveal to Romans. Augustus’ selective whitewashing of the accomplishments that he chose to display in the Res Gestae represents the first step in his exploitation of exemplarity to exercise his concealed authority. In order to translate these deeds into exempla, Roller sets forth that the public must judge an action either good or bad in terms of a shared set of values (Roller, 216). Again, Augustus’ writing of the Res Gestae breaks from the application of this framework.
The book of Aeneid is writing by Virgil who tells a story about a legendary Trojan who traveled to Italy who became an ancestors of the Romans. The age of Augustus is also about a leader that ruled in the Roman emperor. Augustus told Virgil to write a story about a hero and Virgil did as he was told. I believe that the scholars were right about how the Age of Augustus was important to know and to understand it because that was a huge part in the making of The Aeneid. If it wasn’t for Augustus and Virgil then there wouldn’t be the story of Aeneid.
Roman rulers often depicted events from real life and from mythology on their public monuments and architecture, such as their arches and temples. For example, Emperor Augustus featured mythological references in his reliefs that connected his reign to gods such as Apollo and that suggested he was connect to the long history of the Roman people. Roman emperors also constructed sculptures with reliefs in different parts of their vast empire to broadcast their supremacy over conquered subjects. An example is the arch the Romans built in Orange, France, to celebrate their squashing of a rebellion, and Hadrian’s Wall, built in England, was a reminder of Roman power that also served a defensive function. Later, the Emperor Trajan constructed public
For instance, Confederate monuments would allow generations to see that America isn’t “a place reserved for people who still want to spit our country, but rather a place for education that we can learn from the ugly protraction of our history” (Lanktree). Often, we talk about learning from the past so that the same mistakes won’t occur in the future. This specifically can be represented through these monuments; by having a symbol of the past where racism occurred, it serves as a reminder of what discrimination can do when one side is filled with bigotry. Having a place where one can learn about the effects of someone’s wrongdoings can allow today’s people to decide for themselves the future they want to create. Additionally, the author of the article Keep Confederate monuments, but put their horrific history on stage describes how Americans have been “willfully blind” about racial justice and that the statues could be used as reminders of the “catastrophic consequences” (Cose).
The Colosseum stands as a glorious but troubling monument to Roman Imperial power and cruelty. Inside it, for century’s people killed cold bloodedly as entertainment. It seems as if the buildings had gone from one type of extreme to the next. There was very much still a control of power but the values of each monument are different.
One must keep in mind that, monuments may never make everyone happy. As long as a monument was not made with the intention of attacking a group of people it deserves to be
