Should Censorship Be Considered A Loss Of Knowledge Essay

1507 Words7 Pages

According to the American Civil Liberties Union, Censorship is the suppression of words, images, or ideas that are "offensive," happens whenever some people succeed in imposing their personal political or moral values on others. For many years, restricting and censoring resources away from institutions has been common which is why now it is considered a necessity everywhere. But is Censoring really the only way to prevent people from accessing these resources. In my opinion, censoring materials is not an efficient way to suppress sources because you or the institution is taking individuals right away from them and imposing your values and believes in them. It is my believe that censorship should be considered a loss of knowledge because the …show more content…

In an article by Beverly Goldberg, she voices a parents opinion, "When my son went through school and read those books, he got good messages about being a moral person," Burroughs-Molette Elementary School media specialist Judy Teston asserted at the September 10 meeting”. This shows that books that are censored just because of racial slurs or other words don't mean that the books shouldn't be ready. These books should be read because they contain important morals and life lessons. Tara Seale, an English teacher, says “An older generation remembers how the book pushed them into this realm of questioning and wants to create that experience again for the next generation. It is a book that helps us grow and move towards becoming a more understanding and tolerant society, which is ultimately what we would all like to have happened.” This example shows that books like To Kill a Mockingbird are books that have been carried out for three decades because those books have important lessons that are to be learned. In my opinion, by censoring these books we would be losing knowledge because the morals that are taught in these sources are to be