ipl-logo

Should College Athletes Be Paid Analysis

785 Words4 Pages

Horace Michell in his article, “Students Are Not Professional Athletes,” and Dave Zirin in her article, “An Economist Explains Why College Athletes Should Be Paid.",” offers differing views on why student athletes should and or shouldn’t be paid. Horace States that College Athletes are not proficient competitors who are paid pay rates and motivating forces for a profession in games. They are students getting access to a school instruction through their cooperation in games, for which they procure grants to pay educational cost, charges, food and lodging, and other permissible costs. University games are not a vocation or calling. It is the understudies' vehicle to an advanced education degree. This entrance is dependent upon preceded with enlistment, interest in the game for which they got the grant, and scholarly qualification. The NCAA Student Assistance Fund can be utilized to help those understudy competitors who have abnormal needs in abundance of the standard expense of participation. A high rate of understudy competitor’s graduate without the weight of loans, which most different from the other college students on campus. …show more content…

It would not be reasonable to say that all the football players are permitted to get a pay, when the swimming group can't. Each competitor will guarantee that they work pretty much as hard as the other competitor and whether it is genuine or not, it is not reasonable to just pay certain players. This likewise leads into say that imagine a scenario where they did pay the players and the athletic project had a terrible year. This may prompt loss of ticket deals, and TV arrangements/contracts. The system would at present need to pay the players and potentially bring about cash

Show More
Related
905 Words | 4 Pages

Vanderford says, “the players show up for practice, workouts and games. In return, these student athletes receive an annual scholarship renewable by coaches, which includes tuition, fees, room, board, and books” (806). The athletes and the coaches do the same amount of work for the team, yet the coaches get paid much more. Vanderford continues to argue that since both the players and the coaches work to improve the team they should both be treated as employees of the college and receive fair

Read More
358 Words | 2 Pages

Furthermore, the decision to start paying the athletes not only would create a even playing field that has typically been swayed toward the universities. Stipends are needed to control how much is allocated, but that itself will be the spark that is needed. This is important because the relationship between the NCAA and their athletes are like any other employer its employee; employer should pay the employee what they are worth, not just what they feel is equal. The NCAA has duplicated the structure that held many people down in the 1800’s - slavery. They earn the massive income as the laborers (athlete) settle for pennies.

Read More
1208 Words | 5 Pages

That was his mother’s entire annual paycheck! The scholarship suddenly seemed like it would be a drop in a basin of debt. Unfortunately, this situation is similar to that of many college athletes,over eighty six percent of who are poverty-stricken, coming from low-income families, and almost all of them are bombarded with high fees. Though they are in dire need of help, the NCAA, otherwise known as the National Collegiate Athletic Association, refuses to aid these athletes, saying that the players should not receive salaries or any other monetary compensation.

Read More
786 Words | 4 Pages

For example, athletes who spend 90 hours a week training and studying will make these players hungry after the university's dining options are closed. In these situations scholarships fail to provide the student athletes with additional dining options. Even some of the textbooks they need have to come out of their own pocket. Since 86% of the college athletes live below the poverty line and the average out of pocket expenses for a college athlete total $3,222, they need money for the out of pocket expenses. To many people, these things seem like a small price to pay for a full scholarship, but it is important to remember that these scholarships are the only way many athletes can make it to

Read More
1288 Words | 6 Pages

College Athletes Should Be Getting Paid College athletics are a major deal to fans all over the United States. Something about people cheering on their former college or their favorite university can really bring out the fan in everyone. Some states do not have professional sports teams so cheering on college teams is the closest thing they have to the professional sports team experience. This brings up the topic of college athletes getting paid to play the sports they love. The idea of college athletes getting paid is a largely debated topic amongst people from all over the country.

Read More
1103 Words | 5 Pages

As we all know, college can be very expensive. With the scholarships and grants, college student-athletes can go to school for free and get their day-to-day needs such as food, housing, clothes, etc. Ackerman and Scotts, purpose is to show that college is a learning experience and with the help of college sports, the student-athletes will have a chance to grow and be successful in life rather than being exploited. However, critics believe that college student-athletes should be paid salary, like professional athletes, because they want people to see the “athletes are the rule, not the expectation” (par 11). They want the audience to think that it’s a rule for student-athletes to go play pro after two years, will no expectation.

Read More
537 Words | 3 Pages

" This quote proves that the students are bringing in lots of money and the school has plenty to give. College athletes should be paid because they contribute to the school revenues. When it comes to getting fans in the arena it all happens because of the stars coming out of the locker room. Student athletes can be looked at as advertisement because they persuade people to come watch their skills.

Read More
904 Words | 4 Pages

Mike says”Students all over the world work hard at the sport that true love and don’t get a lot in return for it”. While college athletes may not exactly be employees, they are more than just students. Consider the life of a student-athlete, though. The average Division I football player dedicates over 43hours per week to his sport, meaning that he spends more than a typical American work-week training and playing football, in addition to his class work. Their work, which generates exorbitant amounts of money year in and year out, deserves Compensation.

Read More
1622 Words | 7 Pages

Since it’s founding over a century ago, the NCAA has developed from a minute form of extra-curricular involvement offered to students, to a dominant entertainment industry nationwide. The growing success of this program has promoted a genuinely competitive nature, deteriorating the previous category of “amateurism”. Being that it has become such a popular program, the demand for student-athlete dedication has become exuberant. The development has established sports as the central focus for student-athletes as practices and competitions amount to 40+ hour workweeks for them. Such a heavy involvement in addition to school prevents the student-athletes from being able to work, leaving them unable to form an income to afford living expenses that scholarships cannot cover.

Read More
1745 Words | 7 Pages

Every year in the United States more than 100,000 university understudy competitors take an interest in an assortment of various games and as of now they don 't get paychecks for their exhibitions. Numerous individuals have posed the question, ought to school competitors begin getting paid? The basic response to that question is no. The answer is no on the grounds that the framework that is set up now for current competitors is flawless since it gives competitors opportunities, however does not ruin them. There would be numerous defeats if the NCAA and colleges began to pay their competitors.

Read More
1317 Words | 6 Pages

It includes only those funds that end up in the NCAA 's bank account.” The FCAA being the organization that would collect and distribute the capital. This research paper described why college athletes should be paid. They make personal sacrifices, and take risks in order to produce revenue for their schools.

Read More
1273 Words | 6 Pages

Taking a look at the average college student, should they be paid for what they are studying? Probably not. Then why should college athletes be paid? They shouldn 't get paid just because of their athletic ability. They shouldn 't be paid because they are students, not professionals.

Read More
1254 Words | 6 Pages

There are certain things that are included into their scholarship that is not just for classes. The NCAA also doesn’t count these things as pay-to-play, but investments

Read More
1489 Words | 6 Pages

The argument made by these two professors state that Division 1 players qualify as employees under Federal Labor Laws. Since players are under this law, the McCormick’s feel players should get financially compensated due to the physical rigors and balance education simultaneously (Cooper, 2011). It’s unbelievable how this couple thinks Division 1 athletes should get paid. The privilege to attend a university that is costly on full scholarship should be more than enough. Furthermore, student-athletes received stipends as an allowance assist with their livelihood.

Read More
863 Words | 4 Pages

With these large scholarships, “$40,000-50,000”(Chudacoff), extra compensation is not necessary. The scholarship money also gives athletes the privilege that most college students do

Read More

More about Should College Athletes Be Paid Analysis

Related Topics

Open Document