ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of College Athletes Getting Paid

1288 Words6 Pages

College Athletes Should Be Getting Paid College athletics are a major deal to fans all over the United States. Something about people cheering on their former college or their favorite university can really bring out the fan in everyone. Some states do not have professional sports teams so cheering on college teams is the closest thing they have to the professional sports team experience. This brings up the topic of college athletes getting paid to play the sports they love. The idea of college athletes getting paid is a largely debated topic amongst people from all over the country. There are many different opinions that have developed on this subject. There are good points argued for both sides of this issue. However, college athletes should …show more content…

They claim that they cannot afford to pay college athletes when in fact that actually can. With the recent change in college football to make a four team playoff at the end of each season the NCAA will make a much larger amount of money. The NCAA doesn’t only make money off of football. They also bring in a large amount of their revenue from the men’s basketball. During the The NCAA sells the television rights to many different television networks for millions of dollars. The selling of television rights to different networks makes up a large percentage of the NCAA’s revenue. “Most NCAA revenue (81 percent projected for 2012-13) comes from media rights, mostly from a $10.8 billion, 14-year agreement with CBS Sports and Turner Broadcasting for rights to the Division I Men’s Basketball Championship. Most of the remaining revenue comes from NCAA championships, primarily ticket sales” (Revenue) During the “march madness” mens basketball tournament CBS and Turner made over one billion dollars by selling television advertisements at a price of 700,000 dollars for thirty seconds. (Should NCAA Athletes Be Paid?) The NCCA claimed The NCAA is considered a non-profit organization because they give back to the universities. It is known now that “The NCAA’s designation as a nonprofit association is based on how it uses money and not on how much revenue is generated. All but 4 percent of NCAA revenue is either returned directly to member conferences and institutions or used to support championships and programs that benefit student-athletes”

Show More
Related
471 Words | 2 Pages

Sports writer Joe Posnanski’s article “College Athletes Should Not Be Paid” argument over Dallas Morning News Editorial’s article, “paying them is fair, but it doesn't address college athletes' real need: an education” is more convincing to believe that college athletes should not be paid while receiving the benefits of a free education. DMN states that college athletes should be paid, because NCAA generate millions of income because of these players through private contracts. However, Posnanski’s claim that big time players already are paid through free college tuition, as well as covered room and board (Posnanski, 585). Even though DMN claims that college athletes go through difficult education process and may not be able to have chance to play professionally, he then correlated his source of information to the website of the NCAA, however, there is concern if this institution inflated the facts on the website (DMN). In contrast, Posnanski says argument of “College players are the reason why these schools generating so much money and they deserve a much bigger piece of the pie” is not really right.

Read More
281 Words | 2 Pages

The NCAA makes 11 billion dollars a year, makes athletes work over 90 hours a week and sell their personhood. The NCAA has a perfect cheap labor system. They make athletes perform in the classroom and on the field. If an athlete gets hurt or doesn 't perform they can be cut from the team and lose their scholarship and kicked out of school. The student-athletes drive the whole NCAA without them there are no bowl games there is no March Madness and most of all there is no 11 billion dollar industry that is

Read More
625 Words | 3 Pages

Should College Athletes Be Paid? In this informational article “College Athletes Getting Paid? Here Are Some Pros and Cons” by Malcolm Lemmons, athlete, author, and entrepreneur, informs the reader on the NCAA and how they do not pay their players. That has been a very controversial topic over the years on if they should get paid.

Read More
1513 Words | 7 Pages

Since March 31st, 1906 , the day the NCAA was founded, it has been making a vast amount of money off of their athletes by selling various items such as jerseys. College athletes are the face of the organization and are one of main reason why most universities are well known. Why college athletes aren't getting paid for their sweat, blood and tears, is the number one argument in today's sport world. Division one football and basketball are the most watched sports when it comes to the NCAA. These college athletes perform on national television and perform at their peak in order to represent the face of their university.

Read More
537 Words | 3 Pages

Are they students or employees? They spend more time with the sport than in school. Student athletes should be acknowledged for their performances. College athletes should be paid to play because they bring money into the school, advertisement, and they perform the same tasks of pros. College kids bring in thousands of dollars every game day.

Read More
904 Words | 4 Pages

In the 2013-14 seasons, the NBA grossed $4.79 billion in revenues. That’s over 100 times more than an average NBA player makes in his whole career. NCAA men’s basketball tournament accumulated $1.15 billion in ad revenue, $200 million more than the NBA Playoffs that same year. Despite the staggering profit numbers they generated, tournament participants did not receive one cent for their efforts. The NCAA currently resides in a state of pure hypocrisy.

Read More
856 Words | 4 Pages

There has been a significant discussion in regards to whether collegiate athletes should or should not get paid while they are in school. Collegiate athletes all across the nation perform for their dedicated fan bases week in and week out. A lot goes into these marveled matchups that goes unseen. Hard work, dedication, blood, sweat, and tears are shed, yet you wouldn't know that if you're just a typical fan. These are a few of the things that these so called fans don't get to experience firsthand.

Read More
818 Words | 4 Pages

In conclusion, athletes should only be paid enough to support themselves and be able to have some luxuries that they deserve. The reasons they should only be paid that much is because it will save the NCAA a substantial amount opposed to if the athletes were paid if they were 4 Works cited professionals. If athletes were paid they would be able to put food on the table and it

Read More
628 Words | 3 Pages

Think about it this way, what two sports generate the most money from viewership and merchandise? That would be football and basketball; those two sports make most of the money for the “non-profit” NCAA. Why should these sports be paid more than say women's soccer, or a men's lacrosse team? At the same time why do these smaller and less popular sports, by general viewership, deserve as much of a cut as the sports who bring in all of the dough. At this current time in history, the last thing we need as a society is to create discrimination among the sexes or destroy the comradery that college athletes share amongst each

Read More
1299 Words | 6 Pages

However, the significant difference between the NCAA and other businesses is that the NCAA is an organization for students. It pays students in the form of scholarships appropriate for student-athletes. College sports are at the preceding level to professional sports, so paying them as a professional would be inappropriate. Armour must remember that colleges have programs to help the student-athletes, such as career planning, academic help services, and student support centers. If a college athlete is struggling with any aspect of their day, they can use programs the college provides.

Read More
1317 Words | 6 Pages

Ken Feinberg, a renowned sports editor, says that by created an organization that would distribute a certain percentage of what the NCAA makes to former and current college athletes (Jon Solomon). he also says that “It could be former athletes who appeared on television,” Feinberg said. “It could be former athletes the NCAA secured for video games, t-shirts, emblems on automobile stickers or any item. It could be any and all revenue sources that benefit the NCAA. The FCAA is not looking to get revenue from TV outlets.

Read More
1273 Words | 6 Pages

Taking a look at the average college student, should they be paid for what they are studying? Probably not. Then why should college athletes be paid? They shouldn 't get paid just because of their athletic ability. They shouldn 't be paid because they are students, not professionals.

Read More
978 Words | 4 Pages

The million dollar question; should college athletes be paid? This is an immense debate, but if you were to ask me, I would say yes, college athletes should be paid. There are a plethora of reasons why college athletes should get paid. College athletes should get paid because of the amount of time they put into their sport, the amount of money everyone else is making off of them, and their overall importance to the school. There are a myriad of reasons that people can argue the opposite way, but, the reasons they should get paid definitely outweigh the reasons they shouldn’t get paid.

Read More
1538 Words | 7 Pages

College athletes deserve to be paid because they are the only ones not being paid in the college sports industry. The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) generates eleven billion dollars annually, some of which could, and should go to college athletes. “USA Today reported last year just how much money the top 10 coaches in college football made. Nick Saban from Alabama topped the list earning roughly $5.5 million in 2013 alone” (Seibold). The coaches are making millions of dollars and the players aren’t.

Read More
1200 Words | 5 Pages

The NCAA made about 845 billion dollars in the year of 2011 from all the college athletes that went to the colleges, but not any of this money went to any of the college athletes. Now does this sound fair to you? There have been many arguments between people debating if their college athletes should be paid or not. People think that they should be paid because of all the hard work and effort that they put in games. In March Madness, the NCAA (National Collegiate Athletic Association) make an extreme amount of money, but colleges didn’t put in any work, the athletes did.

Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of College Athletes Getting Paid

Open Document