ipl-logo

Essay Why College Athletes Should Not Be Paid

628 Words3 Pages

What most people don't realize is that, in the term student-athlete, the student part comes before the athlete part. With this being said, why are some collegiate level athletes demanding to be compensated for their participation in their respective athletic departments? They are students just like the others at their universities and they aren't going to be paid for their participation in academics. College athletes should not be paid for their play, because they are already compensated enough from their scholarships, gender and difference in sport inequality would come of it, and it's not the NCAA’s fault they know how to market their product. Generally speaking, the average cost of attending a four year public or private university can range from $92,000-$125,000. This the standard for a normal student, without the many benefits of class leading tutors or private facilities to study and complete homework. Athletes with full rides are provided full time college for free with room and board. In addition to this, as of 2015, the NCAA has allowed athletic departments to give stipends, which are small grants of money, to pay for any extra expenditures they might have. This …show more content…

Think about it this way, what two sports generate the most money from viewership and merchandise? That would be football and basketball; those two sports make most of the money for the “non-profit” NCAA. Why should these sports be paid more than say women's soccer, or a men's lacrosse team? At the same time why do these smaller and less popular sports, by general viewership, deserve as much of a cut as the sports who bring in all of the dough. At this current time in history, the last thing we need as a society is to create discrimination among the sexes or destroy the comradery that college athletes share amongst each

Show More
Related
1344 Words | 6 Pages

A common argument for why these athletes should be paid is that they are generating revenue for the school. Even though the athletes generate money for their school most of it is used to support the programs generating the revenue by providing the scholarships that are bringing in the top recruits to the school in the first place. That doesn’t even factor in the medical and travel expenses, free gear, top-notch coaching, unlimited use of elite athletic facilities and a national stage to audition for a job in the professional ranks (Dirlam). Many college athletes are being reimbursed with nearly as much money as the average American makes per year through their scholarships and extra amenities (Dirlam). Another argument that was seen in an online article was that it would not change the quality of top schools through the payment of players (Peebles).

Read More
2997 Words | 12 Pages

Building on the financial disparities, another significant issue with paying athletes is because it takes away from the main priority of college. Paying college athletes undermines the primary purpose of higher education: academics. Colleges are institutions of learning first, and sports should come as a complement to this educational mission. An article that supports this is “Should College Athletes Be Paid,” which was published under Junior Scholastic, where they state: College sports provide hundreds of thousands of student athletes the opportunity to play the sports they love while getting the education and skills they need to succeed after college.

Read More
882 Words | 4 Pages

Collegiate sports help to provide universities with very large sums of money. So why do college athletes not receive a portion of this income? Krikor Meshefejian, author of “Pay to Play: Should College Athletes Be Paid?,”

Read More
839 Words | 4 Pages

In 2011-2012 alone the NCAA made $871.6 million (Slobodzian). The money that is being raked in by the NCAA is made because of student-athlete’s untiring work. Surprisingly, the student-athletes don’t receive any of that money because they have to sign a contract that states that they can’t take any compensation while they play collegiate sports. It has been a heated debate for years and neither side is willing to budge on their stance. Student-athletes in college should be compensated because they make the school a plethora of money and playing a sport is like a full-time job.

Read More
1052 Words | 5 Pages

Paying College Athletes what they Deserve College athletes spend a huge amount of time each week working on their game and bring in an extremely large amount of money in revenue each year for the NCAA yet do not receive any of the revenue made. The benefits of paying athletes far surpass their disadvantages and would make the organization better as a whole. D-1 college athletes spend a large amount of their college life playing or practicing their game yet do not get rewarded for their hard work. Without these college athletes the NCAA would not have made all the money that they have made. All of the people that watch the games watch to see the players play not the coaches coach or officials officiate.

Read More
789 Words | 4 Pages

“Student-athletes already receive significant compensation for participating in college athletics, including free tuition at highly competitive colleges and universities”(“College Athletes Should Remain Amateurs”). This is not true because only full ride scholarships cover all college expenses and these scholarships are only offered to the best. Most of the other scholarships don't fully cover expenses and some players may not even get a scholarship. “Students that show the top level of athletic prowess can earn full ride scholarships”(“Full Ride Scholarships: What They Are and How They Work”). This quote shows that it is very difficult to receive a full ride scholarship or any scholarship.

Read More
634 Words | 3 Pages

They receive expert coaching that could lead to a professional career, medical care, clothing, and some other things. However, according to "Here Are the Odds That Your Kid Becomes a Professional Athlete (Hint: They're Small)", less than 2% of most college athletes make it to the pros from expert coaching. In addition, the clothing they receive is for sports-related stuff only and they can't sell or trade them, and medical coverage has not always covered all injury costs, leaving parents' and athletes' in debt. Not only do people think college athletes shouldn't be paid because of their current earnings, some people also think they shouldn't be paid because college athletic programs can't afford to pay them. " College Athletic Departments Are Taking in More Money Than Ever – and Spending It Just as Fast" states that the NCAA spends $0.45B on staff, $0.41B on coaches and facilities, and $1.37B on other things including travel, equipment, and game day costs in 2004.

Read More
1107 Words | 5 Pages

The NCAA puts its money where its mission is, equipping student-athletes to succeed on the playing field, in the classroom, and throughout life. They aren’t trying to make it so their athletes can live from an income from their sport during college. They are trying to prepare them for the future and help them succeed. In the article “Should NCAA rules be changed to allow intercollegiate athletes to be paid a salary for participating in sports?” (Handy)

Read More
679 Words | 3 Pages

NCAA athletes should receive compensation because they spend countless hours practicing and completing school work, universities are making more money than ever, and athletes literally place their bodies on the line. First of all, NCAA athletes should be paid because of the work they put into their sport and studies. Athletes not only spend hours practicing and weight lifting, but they are also expected to go to class and perform well in their studies. Free time is seldom found for collegiate athletes, and hard work is a definite must. If athletes have any extra time, a good percentage of them probably

Read More
814 Words | 4 Pages

College is a place for students to obtain a college degree and help them to get ahead on their “real world” careers. Athletic departments in college have become huge money incomes in the past ten years; college football and basketball are even shown on the television. This has resulted in many believing these athletes deserve to be paid for their contribution to the schools athletic income. However athletes in college are given the opportunity to play the sport that they love as well as receive a top education. For some players a $20,000+ per year tuition is not enough, they want to be paid with more than just a scholarship.

Read More
772 Words | 4 Pages

Its an uphill battle for both sides, which the NCAA has proved at the end of the day they always win. College athletes do not deserve to be paid. The average of a full, in-state public school scholarship is $15,000 a year. Without these scholarships, many student athletes would not be able to pursue their academic goals.

Read More
1829 Words | 8 Pages

There is no reason to pay college athletes because they are students first and academics should be one’s first priority, they already receive their fair share in extras, many of the athletes receive financial help through athletic scholarships, and the NCAA is an amateur enterprise and no amateur athlete in any sport is paid. The main reason colleges exist is to allow people the chance to get an education and earn a degree. Student-athletes are no exception to this. Just as other students are involved in clubs or groups, athletes play sports. Those students are students first

Read More
1453 Words | 6 Pages

Rodney D. Fort explains that: Many people have an aversion to paying college athletes for their services, but an examination of various principles of economics show that paying athletes makes sense and would make the college sports system more efficient in the way it distributes money. Players would receive more of the revenues they produce while pay would be cut for administrators and other employees in the athletic departments. (Fort 10) Many sports followers wonder where the money would come from if athletes would get paid. They think college athletic departments barely break even but their is some confusion. Fort stated, “Universities allow athletic departments to keep all excess revenues on an updated basis during any given budget period.

Read More
776 Words | 4 Pages

Yet college athletics as a business is as big as professional athletics and the only difference is the money goes in the pockets of coaches, athletic directors, conference commissioners and sports media executives instead of giving players fair pay for a fair days of work. Everyone would benefit more from a athletic system that provide its athletes with better compensation and health care. If the NCAA continues to throw its money into the “broken system” it won't be long until it falls apart and we will all lose.(Debate Club Brian Fredericks) With flipping a question from “why should college athletes be paid?” to “why shouldnt college athletes be paid?”. Intentionally without them performing on the court, field or rink and entertaining millions of college sports fans the NCAA would be swept from billions of dollars.

Read More
563 Words | 3 Pages

In 2015, NCAA division 1 programs generated $9.15 billion of revenue with athletics according to Business Insider, with the athletes not benefiting from that like they should be. I am from Plymouth MN at Wayzata high school and an avid college sports fan. I believe that the collegiate athletes, who are the ones generating revenue for the huge benefits of others, is wrong. The payout should be a percentage of revenue generated because certain sports generate more than others. College athletes should be paid like everyone else in the industry and reap the rewards that the media and NCAA employees are getting over the athletes.

Read More

More about Essay Why College Athletes Should Not Be Paid

Related Topics

Open Document