ipl-logo

Essay Why College Athletes Should Be Paid

563 Words3 Pages

In 2015, NCAA division 1 programs generated $9.15 billion of revenue with athletics according to Business Insider, with the athletes not benefiting from that like they should be. I am from Plymouth MN at Wayzata high school and an avid college sports fan. I believe that the collegiate athletes, who are the ones generating revenue for the huge benefits of others, is wrong. The payout should be a percentage of revenue generated because certain sports generate more than others. College athletes should be paid like everyone else in the industry and reap the rewards that the media and NCAA employees are getting over the athletes. There are two collegiate sports that are ahead of the other sports in revenue generated and that is basketball and football. The athletes playing division 1 and especially in the top programs are generating as much and sometimes even more money than their professional counterparts. In 2017 the NCAA Division 1 basketball tournament alone generated over $1 billion in revenue from media rights fees, ticket sales, corporate …show more content…

The athletes do get an education with a little money for food and other expenses to play at the high level they play at. Most top division 1 athletes in football and basketball do not want to go college but that is the only way to get to the next level. In 2017, of the 253 players drafted to the NFL, 251 were playing in the NCAA in 2016 and 44 of the 60 drafted to the NBA played college in 2016. Over half of the draftees in basketball were underclassmen who did not graduate from college. When picking a school to play for, academics are at the bottom of the priority list for a lot of athletes which you may not think is right but that is what is happening. The NCAA also has their athletes missing school days to compete in tournaments that generate more revenue. There are ways to make this happen for these athletes deserving

Show More
Related
1090 Words | 5 Pages

College athletics is a billion dollar industry and has been for a long time. Due to the increasing ratings of college athletics, this figure will continue to rise. Stronger, faster, bigger athletes will generate more money. College universities generate so much revenue during the year that it is only fair to the players that they get a cut. Some people argue that college athletes have no time to work and therefore should be paid, while others contend that college athletes already receive compensation by not having to pay for college tuition.

Read More
1272 Words | 6 Pages

On average division one athletic programs lose an average of 11 million dollars every year.(NCAA.org) With the 460,000 college athletes(NCAA.org) to monetarily compensate for their time athletic programs. College athletes should not get paid. College athletes should focus on getting a degree, forming unions, and negotiate benefits. If players start to get paid for playing in college athletics the sport will no longer be considered amateur.

Read More
2095 Words | 9 Pages

An ESPN columnist, Scoop Jackson, explains that this topic shouldn’t even be an argument because these colleges are allowed to be making the money that they do. Scoop relates these colleges to businessmen in the sense that in order for these colleges to offer the amount of knowledge and opportunities that they do, they need to be making money. “Instead, we subconsciously and constantly look at college sports as something different” (Jackson 1). Jackson is explaining how most people let the “school” part blind them into thinking that the educational piece changes the dynamics of what is really going on and that it exempts athletics from being about something other than money (Jackson 1). Jackson is able to push his argument very well by comparing college to a business, because as most students are able to see by the second they step in that every little thing in a college town has a price.

Read More
917 Words | 4 Pages

The NCAA published a study in 2020 which highlighted how low of a chance student athletes have at going pro, for football only 1.6% percent of student athletes went pro, while in Men's Basketball student athletes only had a 1.2% chance of going pro. ("Estimated probability of competing in professional athletics. " NCAA.org,) This shows that its important that the student athletes get paid as they sacrifice their time and college experience to go professional in a sport with an exceedingly low chance of making

Read More
776 Words | 4 Pages

Yet college athletics as a business is as big as professional athletics and the only difference is the money goes in the pockets of coaches, athletic directors, conference commissioners and sports media executives instead of giving players fair pay for a fair days of work. Everyone would benefit more from a athletic system that provide its athletes with better compensation and health care. If the NCAA continues to throw its money into the “broken system” it won't be long until it falls apart and we will all lose.(Debate Club Brian Fredericks) With flipping a question from “why should college athletes be paid?” to “why shouldnt college athletes be paid?”. Intentionally without them performing on the court, field or rink and entertaining millions of college sports fans the NCAA would be swept from billions of dollars.

Read More
1541 Words | 7 Pages

With this growing fan base, Universities and the NCAA have seen a dramatic rise in revenue per year. But, although both are bringing in impressive amounts of revenue, the amount is still nowhere near enough to cover paying every NCAA athlete a salary. According to Cork Gaines, “nearly half of the Division I schools (44%) make less than $20 million, or more than $160 million less than Texas A&M and the University of Texas [in 2015]” (Gaines). Although Universities as a whole bring in a lot of money, it is very easy to notice that there is a major gap between the amount of revenue different Universities make. Based on both the fact that there is not enough money and that it is extremely difficult to distribute the money evenly (between Universities, sports, genders, etc.), athletes should also not be paid based on the fact that there is no economically efficient way of paying every athlete a

Read More
457 Words | 2 Pages

If college athletes do not make money from their sport where are they going to make money from? Most of the college athletes come from poor families and are here on a scholarship. This brings about the most used reason the NCAA has safeguarded its arrangements for paying school competitors which is on the grounds that these athletes are frequently on full grants that cover educational costs, settlement, charges and feast arranges at the college they go to (Metonymy). While these expenses are all together secured there are many costs related to being a college athlete that the tuition does not cover. For instance, players who burn through about 80 hours, seven days a week training and studying will regularly end up hungry after the college's

Read More
1025 Words | 5 Pages

Another reason these athletes are unable to receive payments is because they are looked at as student who do not play on a professional level. The NCAA by-laws states that, “…a professional athlete is one who receives any kind of payment, directly or indirectly, for athletics participation except as permitted by the governing legislation of the Association” (12). The NCAA has evaded paying these athletes for so long because under the NCAA guidelines these athletes are students that have “amateur status” and do not qualify for compensation… The NCAA must update their regulations and consider paying these athletes so they can have money aside from their scholarship to provide themselves with other necessities such as clothing, travel expenses and anything else they could need that their scholarship cannot take care

Read More
912 Words | 4 Pages

Ticket sales, tv, alumni donations, and more other sales made to the schools bring up to a combine of about 6.1 billion dollars. 6.1 billion dollars can be split to college athletes, because when you pay off the athletes you still will have at least 5 billion to work with. With all this money being made by the colleges, the TV stations, merchandisers, the advertisers, and the coaches, many a college player has posed the question, "Where's my cut?" (PR, Newswire. " March Madness - Should College Athletes Get Paid?.

Read More
1295 Words | 6 Pages

That means for every 100 athletes, only three or four of them will actually “go pro”. Playing in college may be the only chance that athletes get to use their stance of being an athlete to earn money. While an athletic scholarship pays for some or all of their college expenses, it does not cover outside expenses that are part of their daily life, such as traveling home and doing laundry. Former basketball player Kareem Abdul Jabar says in his article ¨It’s time to Pay the Tab for America’s College Athletes” that during his time at the University of Los Angeles, he was “generally too poor to do anything but study, practice, and play. ”(Abdul Jabbar) Student-athletes should be able to seek every opportunity to earn money, but they cannot because of the strict rules that have been put in place.

Read More
810 Words | 4 Pages

Paying college athletes would not be beneficial at all for the players, programs, and schools. College athletics is one of the most exciting sport spectacles in the country. According to businessinsider.com, 231 NCAA division 1 schools brought in 9.15 billion dollars in revenue in 2015. It is obvious that college sports are extremely popular. But they are not popular because of the handful of stars in the whole NCAA.

Read More
733 Words | 3 Pages

Most of them do not have the time to get jobs, because of training with the sport they play, and having to maintain a decent GPA. According to The Huffington Post , Division-1 scholarships are only worth $25,000 per year. Most of the athletes who acquire these scholarships do not even stay at the school for the full four years. A lot of them transfer to other schools, so that their situations could be made better. They could earn more playing time and a better opportunity to make it pro.

Read More
473 Words | 2 Pages

But NCAA only concerns are how college athletes do on field, Ignoring their education levels. Instead of putting majority of their effort on College athletes study level, NCAA are more focused towards income coming through athletes and leading them to a hopeless life after their playing career. NCAA assures athletes with privileges and Money during their time with them. Although this may be true but Colleges athletes’ Education levels are still suffering and could prove devastating for their upcoming future plans.

Read More
722 Words | 3 Pages

And this may change college sports forever. ”(Bowen, 2014). Another source said “Athletes earn their schools hundreds of thousands of dollars, increase enrollment, and if they do well, provide a recruiting piece for generations. Top NCAA executives are getting $1 million per year while an athlete can't earn $50 from signing a few autographs. ”(Harnett, 2013).

Read More
1638 Words | 7 Pages

This source that college sports have a large income revenue and the athletes don’t get any out of it. Many athletes feel as if they should get some of the profit and it is unfair: “As the business of college athletics continues to grow exponentially, more and more attention is directed towards the disparity between the revenue generated and what the players receive as compensation (Vaderford and Ryan 806). This shows an alternative that stats that as money comes in to the university the players can have a share of their own. In the argument on payment for athletes it is nice to see both sides of the

Read More

More about Essay Why College Athletes Should Be Paid

Open Document