ipl-logo

Analysis: Why College Athletes Should Be Paid

839 Words4 Pages

In 2011-2012 alone the NCAA made $871.6 million (Slobodzian). The money that is being raked in by the NCAA is made because of student-athlete’s untiring work. Surprisingly, the student-athletes don’t receive any of that money because they have to sign a contract that states that they can’t take any compensation while they play collegiate sports. It has been a heated debate for years and neither side is willing to budge on their stance. Student-athletes in college should be compensated because they make the school a plethora of money and playing a sport is like a full-time job.

First of all, student-athletes deserve the money that they bring in through their persistent work and dedication to their sport. On the one hand, some argue that collegiate …show more content…

On the other hand, however, others argue that college athletes shouldn’t receive compensation because they will make irresponsible decisions with it. Lemmons displays his doubts about how much of a success paying collegiate athletes would be. He claims that college students don’t know how to manage money. “Colin Cowherd states, “I don’t think paying all college athletes is great; not every college is loaded, and most 19-year-olds (are) gonna spend it—and let’s be honest, they’re gonna spend it on weed and kicks!”’(Lemmons). Lemmons, as a former collegiate athlete, knows how trying it is to be a “student-athlete”.However, his argument that college kids will spend their money on things they don’t need is invalid because they have a choice to do what they want with their money. The bottom line is that they deserve to be compensated for their demanding work. Additionally, many college-athletes come from less fortunate families who could really put that money to good use. “Student-athletes” should be paid to play sports because they put in a lot of time and work constantly to be able to play at such a high level.Paying players would also pro level players to stay in college longer because they can still support their families while completing their

Show More
Related
2434 Words | 10 Pages

2019, www.theperspective.com/debates/sports/college-athletes-get-paid/. Summary: In the bottom section of this article, the author delves into a couple specific reasons why college athletes do not need or deserve compensation. Piccioto talks more about the harm that compensation for college athletes does to them, rather than the harm done to the universities. Piccioto suggests that paying college athletes takes away from what college actually is and he argues that the athletes should be treated as normal students, since they really are.

Read More
967 Words | 4 Pages

Division I Athletes Should Be Paid In college there can be a wide of activities to enjoy. Social and academic clubs, fraternities and sororities however, there is one activity very popular in universities that not only gives students a sense of unity and pride as they cheer for their home team but generates millions of dollars in revenue for the NCAA (National Collegiate Athletic Association): college sport teams. With the popularity of college sports and the vast amount of revenue colleges are generating from these sports an argument about whether these college athletes should be given a salary has begun to surface. Tracey M DiLascio, a graduate of Boston University school of Law and a former judicial clerk in the New Jersey Superior Court, states “The NCAA estimated revenue in 2014 was nearly $1 billion, 80 to 90 percent which came from the Men’s division 1 basketball tournament” (3).

Read More
956 Words | 4 Pages

Major college football and basketball programs bring in millions of dollars a year for their university and the NCAA. Many people claim the players are the reason these programs make so much money and should be compensated for their work. At first this seems to be logical, but there are many flaws with paying athletes. However, athletes should be able to pursue business opportunities. College athletes should not be paid for playing sports, but should be able to have an outside income.

Read More
1103 Words | 5 Pages

College sports is one of the best-known entertainments around the world. But for the athletes, they are students first then athletes second. For college student-athletes, there are a variety of scholarships and grants to help pay for college or college debt. However, some critics say that student-athletes should be paid a salary like pro athletes would, with help from scholarships or grants. The authors of, College Athletes are being Educated, not Exploited, Val Ackerman and Larry Scott, argue that student-athletes are already paid by free education and other necessities.

Read More
537 Words | 3 Pages

" This quote proves that the students are bringing in lots of money and the school has plenty to give. College athletes should be paid because they contribute to the school revenues. When it comes to getting fans in the arena it all happens because of the stars coming out of the locker room. Student athletes can be looked at as advertisement because they persuade people to come watch their skills.

Read More
904 Words | 4 Pages

Mike says”Students all over the world work hard at the sport that true love and don’t get a lot in return for it”. While college athletes may not exactly be employees, they are more than just students. Consider the life of a student-athlete, though. The average Division I football player dedicates over 43hours per week to his sport, meaning that he spends more than a typical American work-week training and playing football, in addition to his class work. Their work, which generates exorbitant amounts of money year in and year out, deserves Compensation.

Read More
1438 Words | 6 Pages

In an interview with Sean Levonaitis, a future Division I football player, he was asked if he thought student-athletes should be able to make money off of their names or athletic ability. He responded, “I believe athletes should not be able to make money at levels college and under.” His reasoning was similar to others who share his opinion. “When you are in college playing a sport, that is not your main responsibility.” Education always comes first, and this is why collegiate players are referred to as “student-athletes.”

Read More
1312 Words | 6 Pages

Even though there are opposing viewpoints and things that still need to be sorted out, the benefits that college athletes experience out way the disadvantages and that college athletes should be compensated for their hard work. College athletes experience financial struggles and exploitation and they should reap the financial benefits of their

Read More
504 Words | 3 Pages

College athletes should be paid because they play in games where the atmosphere and the way of play are so similar to the way a professional games are played. Colleges and the NCAA don’t want to pay college athletes as the argue that the athletes play in an amateur Division I type of game compared to the way professionals play (Furth). The NCAA keeps arguing that colleges play amateur sports and this keeps them from paying the athletes what they’re suppose to. As NCAA calls the sport that the athletes play “amateur”,so they only get cheap scholarships.

Read More
1057 Words | 5 Pages

A quote from the article presented that I can relatively say I disagree with is when Posnanski states, “Big-time athletes do get paid. They get free college tuition.” Although ‘big-time’ athletes get a free college tuition, they have absolutely no time to go out and get a job, and work for the money they will need once out of college. College athletes spend their time being in college and when they aren’t doing that they’re going to practice and games to fulfill the ‘athlete’ section of that title. These college athletes only have their free tuition because of their abilities to play sports well.

Read More
2359 Words | 10 Pages

In conclusion, student-athletes should continue to be a students first and athletes second. The idea of free college at your dream school may be a little hard to handle when you are on top of the world after receiving your scholarship so it may seem that athletics are all that matter. Wrong, academics should be the number one priority when it comes to student-athlete life. There is no need to try and turn this into a job making these kids think that this is all they need to do to be successful. It is believed that athletes who are playing at these bigger schools deserve to be paid because on top of winning games they bring in plenty of money and revenue to the school.

Read More
1330 Words | 6 Pages

The topic of whether or not to pay college athletes has been a controversial debate for many years. While many people argue that athletes work for the school, making them student workers, others argue that they simply hold the athlete title. The debate is not only about paying them, but who all will get paid and where their income will come from. When deciding on which side to choose, there are many factors one must consider. We must contemplate what it means to be a college student, what it means to specifically be an undergraduate student, and what it means when they sign the contract to play their sport.

Read More
668 Words | 3 Pages

It’s been highly debated if student-athletes should be paid for the money they generate for the school, or if covering for their college expenses is just enough. The majority of student-athletes will not generate an abundant amount of money for their schools, although it’s not the same in certain circumstances. For instance, if a student makes more money than all of it’s college expenses and athletic cost then they should have the right to be paid. The NCAA, National Collegiate Athletic Association, gets most of the heat as the source of why student-athletes don’t get paid.

Read More
771 Words | 4 Pages

Throughout the years, there have been constant debates as to whether college athletes should be paid. But since students are already being covered by their scholarships and the scholarships cover the student’s necessities such as medical needs and food, colleges fail to see that those young adults need a lot more than basic necessities such as clothing, hygiene materials, or even video games, new phones and much more. Student-athletes definitely deserve to get paid since they put all of their free time and all of their attempt to play for their school and receive somewhat of an education while colleges and the NCCA are rolling around in their money that those students earned but did not receive. Utmost people believe that the NCCA and colleges should be paying their sports players since “The college sports industry generates $11 billion in annual revenues. Fifty colleges report annual revenues that exceed $50 million” ( Text 1 line 1-2).

Read More
1538 Words | 7 Pages

College athletes put in a lot of time, effort, and work into the sport they’ve played since they were young, but they aren’t getting paid for it. These student athletes deserve to be paid because they put in countless hours of hard work and balance sports with school work. The first reason athletes in college do deserve to be compensated is because they don 't have time to fit in work with a school and athletic schedule. College athletes don’t have time to get a real job. Student athletes have a very busy schedule, they don’t have time to fit in a job.

Read More

More about Analysis: Why College Athletes Should Be Paid

Related Topics

Open Document