Many people around the world don’t have a college education. Therefore, they work in low-wage positions and overwork themselves. While everyone eagerly awaits the realization of the "American Dream," it will never come true due to the high expense of tuition. Since people feel even more anxious when they consider the high cost of tuition and students doubt the worth of attending college, students should be able to enjoy a free college education because they will prioritize their academic work over anything else and will also benefit by avoiding long-term debt.
The ability to avoid incurring substantial debt is among the main justifications for providing free higher education to students. Many people all across the world lack a college degree.
…show more content…
Making college free would, at the very least, help people stay happier, which means they would be healthier. It could also lead to spectacular moments of innovation that change the world. Given all of these considerations, free college would most likely benefit a subset of students currently denied entry to higher education owing to financial constraints—those with talent and some cultural capital but a lack of funds. In other words, even though the word "free" appears in the descriptor, any discussion of college is highly …show more content…
This implies that society can advance more quickly. People with education can also comprehend their society's past and present economic conditions better. They might therefore be more motivated to engage in politics and advance their nation. Improve equality, many of the world's best minds are from low-income families, but this should not discourage them from pursuing higher education. "Since affordability is a huge issue," everyone would be able to attend school if everyone had equal access to education (University of the People). Given all of these considerations, free college would most certainly benefit individuals currently unable to pursue higher education.
Some people, however, may argue that free college would result in a flood of graduates with mediocre qualifications competing for a small number of jobs. For example, they argue that to stand out from the crowd, committed workers would need to earn a doctorate, "neither would it address the changing social milieu of higher education" (Cottom). That is an Sharma 3 understandable concern. However, those with talent and some cultural capital but a lack of funds would likely benefit from free college, as would a subset of