Should Date Labels On Food Be Changed Rhetorical Analysis

468 Words2 Pages

Should date labels on food be changed? This is a tough question because both sides have pros and cons. When changing the labels, less food is going to waste. When the labels stay the same, you know when the best time to eat that food is. Although the labels now are good, a change of date labels is needed.
One reason that the law of date labels needs to change is because the labels are confusing people. Emily Broad Leib said, “Further, the dates are not indicators of safety, but are instead manufacturers’ best guesses of peak quality. No wonder consumers are confused” ( Leib 2 ). People are confused because not all the dates mean that the product has expired. Some of the dates are just for the store workers or that's just the best time to use them. People need to know when the food has gone bad. With how confusing all these labels are they definitely need changed.
The biggest reason for changing the labels is that people are wasting loads of food. Passage 2 said that,“In the U.S., an estimated 40% of food goes uneaten, and the average American household loses $1560 annually by purchasing food they end up throwing away” ( Leib 2 ). This is all going to waste because the labels are misleading. People are …show more content…

The data labels now are good because they allow people to know when exactly the product is at its peak to eat. However date labels don’t let people know when the food is expired. Therefore people might consume expired food. With the date labels changed, people will know when the food has gone bad. Another reason why the date labels now are good is because they are not meant for the consumer, they are meant for the store workers. The store workers need to know when the product can not be sold anymore. Although this is a good point, people will be confused by this and not understand that it is for the workers. All of these points show that a change of date labels is