ipl-logo

Should Electoral College Be Abolished Research Paper

837 Words4 Pages

The Electoral College Needs to be Abolished Every four years, millions of Americans rush to the polls to vote for the next President of the United States of America. What many Americans voting today may not know is that they are participating in an unfair system; this system is taking power from a majority of Americans and placing an emphasis on the few. The best solution to this problem is the simplest one, abolish the Electoral College. The Electoral College should be abolished because of over-representation of small states. “The Electoral College violates political equality”. It is not a neutral counting device. It favors some citizens over others, depending solely upon the state in which voters cast their vote for president.” This quote …show more content…

In the current electoral college system, the value of one’s vote heavily depends on the state they reside in. For example, Document A shows that smaller states with fewer residents wield disproportionate influence in presidential elections due to the minimum of three electoral votes they hold, regardless of population size. By abolishing the electoral college, we can ensure that every individual’s vote is equal, no matter where they live, and that every voice is heard on a level playing field in deciding the nation's leader. Another problem with the Electoral College is that it almost always eliminates third-party candidates. In document B, the charts clearly state that no matter how many votes a third party candidate gets, they’re never going to win the electoral vote. This is because the college ensures they get no votes to keep the majority wins rule. According to document B in 1922 the candidates Clinton, Bush, and Perot had various percentages for the popular vote. Clinton’s was 43%, Bush’s was 37.5%, and Perot’s was 18.9%. With all this information it obviously shows that although Perot was not the main candidate to become president, he was still in the running, not far behind …show more content…

This shows that the Electoral College undercuts the principle of one person, one vote, and therefore violates political equality. “It is not a neutral counting device... it favors some citizens over others, depending solely upon the state in which voters cast their votes for president” (Document D). Political equality means all citizens are equal and it also allows citizens to partake in state affairs, including the right to vote and the right to challenge elections. The electoral college has trouble endorsing democratic values of the United States. In document E, George Will said “the winner takes all electoral vote allocation tends to produce a winning margin that looks like national decisiveness.” Pretty much he’s saying that because how heavily electoral votes weigh the electoral college gets to choose the president they want. Also because of majority rules there often ends up being a huge gap between the winner and the runner up. With this kind of process, it makes the country look like it all agreed to vote for that person, even if it wasn’t the one who won the popular vote. Along with citizens not

Show More
Related
1393 Words | 6 Pages

According to Article II, Section I of the Constitution, the number of electors in each state will be “equal to the whole number of Senators and Representatives to which the state may be entitled in the congress.” Every state has 2 senators (an equal number), which means that states with lower population size are represented the same as states with higher population numbers. Robert Dahl explains this unequal representation as “a situation in which your vote for your representative is counted as one while the vote of a friend in a neighboring town is counted as seventeen” (Dahl 2003). Unequal representation is a “violation” of democracy, completely discounting political equality among all citizens. The author argues that the Electoral College contains additional inherent problems, for example, the fact that the winner of popular votes may not be chosen for President unless they win the electoral votes.

Read More
1603 Words | 7 Pages

Benjamin Bolinger, the author of, “Point: Abolishing the Electoral College,” believes that America was founded on the idea of majority rule. He asserts that the Electoral College defies these ideals through the winner-take-all system, which has allowed candidates to lose the popular vote but still earn a ticket to the white house. The author believes that the President should be chosen the same way as every other elected official, by a popular vote. In a popular vote, the majority would rule and every person’s voice would matter (179). In addition, the author points out that America was also founded on the phrase, “no taxation without representation,” and yet four million United States citizens are excluded entirely from voting in the election.

Read More
967 Words | 4 Pages

As one of the most hotly debated areas of the US government, the Electoral College deserves to be given a more in-depth look. It was originally founded as a way to prevent a lack of informed voters from electing an unqualified president. Now, it still serves its original purpose, but has become far less necessary in an age of easily accessible information. Despite having some positive points, the Electoral College is too overburdened by issues like unfair vote distribution and a high failure rate to be an effective system. The way the Electoral College distributes votes is overtly favorable to less populated states.

Read More
931 Words | 4 Pages

One of the United States’ fundamental beliefs is the idea that fair taxation with equal representation. Author of, “5 Advantages and Disadvantages of Electoral College”, Louise Gaille, elaborates, “In national representation, each state and population district receives equal representation, in either the house or the senate, and that allows individual voters to still have a say in what happens” (Gaille). The Electoral College was built on compromises the Founding Fathers made to ensure the equal ability for everyone to impact the decisions made in the country. Without national representation, states with smaller populations won’t have their votes as considered as the votes from larger states. For example, although Wyoming makes up about .18% of the population, they still control .56% of all electoral votes.

Read More
876 Words | 4 Pages

Bella Seedhouse Mrs. Sisamis CCP Government 3 May 2024 Abolition of the Electoral College The United States government is constantly changing and evolving to suit the needs of its citizens and to best represent the majority. Shifting from the Articles of Confederation to drafting the Constitution is just one example of the many times the United States has progressed towards the betterment of the nation. The ability of our government to change laws and our founding document allows our nation to move forward and continuously improve our system of democracy. Currently, there is an issue with the voting system and presidential election outcomes: the Electoral College. The Electoral College maintains the power to overrule the decision of the popular

Read More
724 Words | 3 Pages

The Electoral College has been around for many years and has proven to be a useful tool in voting for a president. However, as useful as it is, we must ask if it is still the most optimal option when voting for president now that we have electronic communication and can spread information like wildfire. The Electoral College is flawed and should be changed.

Read More
1137 Words | 5 Pages

The US’s Electoral College has always been a controversial topic. When it was written into the Constitution, it was meant as a compromise between the small and large states, and between Congress and the states (M. West). Since then, the Electoral College system has been how the United States elected its presidents. However, it continues to face criticism and many want the system to change, favoring systems such as a national popular vote instead (National Conference of State Legislatures). Despite how the US’s Electoral College effectively balances power between the states and the federal government, it is still a deeply flawed voting system due to it being based on unrealistic expectations and outdated ideals that should be changed to reflect

Read More
1670 Words | 7 Pages

“America’s election systems have operated smoothly for more than 200 years because the Electoral College accomplishes its intended purposes. America’s presidential election process preserves federalism, prevents chaos, grants definitive electoral outcomes, and prevents tyrannical or unreasonable rule. The Founding Fathers created a stable, well-planned, and carefully designed system—and it works.” This was written by Tara Ross in a Heritage Foundation memorandum (Stepman). The electoral college is a body of people representing the states of the US, who formally cast votes for the election of the president and vice president.

Read More
2217 Words | 9 Pages

So, rather than basing the number of the electoral votes in each state according to its number of representatives and senators, the electoral votes would be based on the percentage of the “popular vote won”. Although the proponents of this plan argue that it retains the Electoral College vigor, “the results would be closer to the national popular vote outcome” (Ross, 2004). They also argue that, “the voices of minority voting groups would be reflected in the final election tally because even ballots cast for third-party candidates could be reflected in the national results” (Ross, 2004). Thus, it is also likely to happen that a presidential candidate can win the election without winning the popular but Ross claims that, it will happen less likely than the system that we have in present

Read More
340 Words | 2 Pages

Due to the past election there has been several protests and opposing opinions thrown from both the Democratic and Republican parties. One particular article, “Why We Should Abolish the Electoral College”, suggests the idea that our society should abolish the electoral college, due to it’s “unequal distributed [voting power] across our nation”, and switch to the popular vote, when voting during a presidential election. At first this idea may seem sensible to those who do not understand how the electoral college works, the demand is in fact, senseless and will only lead to unproportioned voting amongst all states. However, it is easy to understand why this article is depicting that the electoral college needs adjustments, and to view the main

Read More
1259 Words | 6 Pages

The United States Electoral College is an American system designed by the founding fathers to conduct elections. However, it has become subject to controversy in the 2016 Presidential election. The unique aspect of the Electoral College is how electors are awarded to presidential candidates using a state-by-state method of determining the number of electors. While the Electoral College is fundamental to the founders of America to protect the nation, its fatal flaws are too damaging to the people of the United States. In my opinion, the Electoral College needs to be reexamined in order to establish a new way of electing Presidents and Vice Presidents.

Read More
910 Words | 4 Pages

The electoral college has controlled the voting system within the United States since the writing of the United States Constitution. The system promises to fix problems that would otherwise exist in a popular vote system, but also exhibits many problems of its own that are often overlooked. In this essay, I will argue that the current model of the electoral college should no longer be in place in the United States of America. I will begin with the most common and obvious reason that the electoral college is criticized. The ideas that make up the electoral college directly conflict with those of a true democracy.

Read More
839 Words | 4 Pages

Being a person of politics yourself, you of all people should know that many compromises have been made over the course of the establishment of the United States. However, some of the compromises, like the electoral college, were made because of factors in the past and are now not needed in today’s modern democracy. While the electoral college once worked as a compromise in the past, it is an archaic system that unfairly represents the votes of citizens all across the nation. A popular vote should instead be utilized to fairly choose the people of power in this country and would better represent voters’ opinions. In implementing the electoral college, most states’ votes either go to one candidate or the other, leading to candidates to only campaign in swing states (Bradford Plumer 13).

Read More
1592 Words | 7 Pages

However, there has been much controversy over the electoral college, especially in the last few years, due to people’s belief that it unfairly weights some voters over others and the “loaded gun” phenomenon. Due to these controversies many people believe the electoral college voting system to

Read More
2998 Words | 12 Pages

The United States utilizes a fair, equally representative system to elect its president, right? Wrong. By examining the most basic criterion of evaluating elections, the classic “Everyone’s vote should count the same,” the United States, and more specifically the Electoral College, is doing an unequivocally terrible job representing its citizens in presidential elections. The Electoral College currently counts one Vermonter’s vote as equal to three Texans’, and one Wyomingite’s vote is worth four Californians’. Clearly this is unacceptable, and thankfully it can be changed.

Read More

More about Should Electoral College Be Abolished Research Paper

Open Document