Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
What is important of National anthem
Essay on importance of national anthem
Essay on importance of national anthem
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: What is important of National anthem
However, the fact is that most Americans have the impression that Hispanic immigrants are perceived as a threat for not assimilating into the American mainstream, more so into the Anglo-Protestant values. Why is that? Is it for fear that the Spanish Language may overrun the country? Similarly, Neil Foley, author of, Mexicans In The Making of America, asks the same questions, why fear? In his prologue chapter, Foley makes a point by proving the fact that in the past, Mexican immigrants were not a concern but were, “ let in to provide the labor force for the rapidly expanding economy”(2).
The United States of America was founded by people who were mainly trying to escape from some religious laws, to gain religious freedom or religion equality. Most of America 's first immigrants were Christians, therefore is no surprise the country is built on and with Christian morals. During 1980 a large population of immigrants came into U.S, this group of immigrants came from 5 different continents, with different religious backgrounds. However, the largest religious group among this large population of immigrants were Christians. About one-third of this immigrant who are not Christians find it difficult and unsafe to stay in a country where Christians seem to have an upper hand, very few of this people have stepped out from their comfort
I have seen people get offended when you assume they can speak the language of their people, because they grew up in America, “their people” speak English. Others get hurt when you do not make an effort to understand their culture. We have to be mindful of this. The author mentions Jewish and Chinese private schools in the US (p. 155). It is possible that rather than having a nation where everyone eventually integrates, that we instead will have a nation where everyone wants to hold on to their heritage.
In 2008, Linda Chavez wrote an article for Tucson Citizen, “Immigration policy’s goal should be assimilation”, and in 2009, Laura Marcus participated in a debate under the question, “Should immigrants assimilate?” Chavez, an author and talk show host believes that to be a “successful” immigrant, assimilation is important. Marcus, a student at Yale during the time of her debate, argues that to ask an
Rush Limbaugh discusses multiculturalism and its possible failings to America culture. Limbaugh believes teaching minorities about their roots hinder their “future as Americans.” He continues to say “If you want to prosper in America, if you want access to opportunity in America, you must be able to assimilate: to become part of the American culture.” This statement, personally, implies other cultures cannot have the same work ethic and values as “regular” Americans, which is a presumptuous statement to make. To a certain point, yes, incoming immigrants and generational immigrants do have to adapt to the American culture, but their roots do not discount their ability to succeed in American society.
David Brooks, a professor at Yale University and a writer for the New York Times, in his “The Uses of Patriotism” (2016), argues that the American national anthem promotes unity and therefore Americans should all respect the standing tradition. He first supports his argument by stating that America was the vision of a land where everyone has promised opportunities, then by stating the decline in American patriotism doesn’t fortify the creed of solidarity, and finally by stressing it will support 2016 presidential candidate Donald Trump’s erecting barrier between ethnicities. Brooks’ purpose is to criticize Americans kneeling during the national anthem in order to persuade them it only causes less unification when the Americans need it most.
Between 1937 and 1965, it would be rare to see every Aboriginal person truly express his or her happiness. Although there were improvements to some Aborigines’ lives, the Policy of Assimilation did not ameliorate the lives of most Aboriginal Australians between 1937 and 1965. The assimilation policy conveys the idea of white superiority and black inferiority, manifesting racial inequality and discrimination against Aboriginal Australians. Assimilation policies prompted the forcible removal of Aboriginal children, decreased and oppressed the Aboriginal population and their culture and Aborigines had lacking rights to citizenship. The negative impacts evidently preponderate the positives (if any).
Hundreds or thousands immigrates legal or illegal come to the United States for jobs. Some immigrates come because they need money for their family and other's come because they want to danger us. Immigrates should be allow to come to the United States because they're better jobs there ,and also they need money for their family. For example, many immigrates struggle to pay for their family needs and it's really hard because I had a friend that her parents had to move to the United States for better jobs. Her parents couldn't pay the bills in Mexico so the only way to get money and better jobs are in the United States.
One of the articles I read was titled, “Symposium Introduction: Immigration and National Identity”. It discussed what one’s national identity means in the modern age when immigration is such a frequent occurrence. Florida Senator Mel Martinez spoke 3 sentences of Spanish in his opening address to the floor. This event proves how integrated and commonplace hearing Spanish is in modern America. However in Samuel Huntington’s latest book, Who Are We?
For many new immigrants coming to America, it is difficult to adjust into the new society. Many come to America without the basic knowledge of English, the new immigrants do not have the ability assimilate to American society because of the lack of possible communication between the immigrant and an native. Non-English speaking immigrants that come to America face harsh challenges when trying to assimilate to U.S. society because immigrants are often segregated into ethnic communities away from natives, Americans do not know basics of words of other well known languages, and the lack of government funding education programs. Assimilation into a new society is difficult enough, but when the society pushes any new immigrants to separate part
“We are a nation of millions of people with a pedigree that includes blood lines from every corner of the world” ( Reagan). When people from different countries that have different cultures and beliefs move to the United States, their cultures and beliefs move with them. Citizens of the United States are given so many freedoms, and that’s part of the appeal. People want to move to the U.S. to live a life of freedom and liberty - to get away from places that tell them what they need to be. An national religion would change the whole dynamic of the United States; part of the diversity would disappear.
Do you think that illegal immigrants should have a path to citizenship? I think that they should. They don 't harm the U.S they actually improve it. Nearly 14 million immigrants entered the United States from 2000 to 2010, and over one million persons were naturalized as U.S. citizens in 2008. There were 11.5 million unauthorized immigrants in the United States as of 2011.
The destruction of its blended cultures, even through things viewed as small or unimportant as destroying the way a sentence is structured or a word pronounced because it is dissimilar to the way one majority group has deemed as “proper,” should be of great concern to every citizen who values his or her continued American
An illegal immigrant, who works for their keep, pays taxes, doesn't get into trouble, and just wants a better life in a country, should be granted citizenship. An illegal immigrant is a person who migrates to a different country in a way that is in violation of the immigrant laws. Immigration has been a tough topic to bring up for many years in America. Illegal immigrants are seen as a bad thing for America, but some see them as an economic savior. There are over 11 million undocumented immigrants in the United States.
What does McGary mean by the assimilationist- separatist debate? What McGary means by the assimilationist-separatist debate is, he means that assimilationist are optimistic about people with different kinds of races can achieve anything even when with a tragic story of slavery. Also, they believe that it’s possible for blacks to work with whites, because of the positive influence they can impact. Now, a separatist is more doubtful of blacks and whites working together positively in the United States of America, because the influence of people who would opt out of the U.S. believing: one people, one nation.